Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it true that RTO was pushed to July?

Yes. The union is claiming victory; they are downright giddy that the allegations of harassment lead to a delay in RTO.

NP and the two may not be related. It is possible they are engaging in mediation or management wants to wait until the matter is litigated before the FSIP before RTO. There may be a risk to imposing RTO if they are not confident they can do it unilaterally.

I know they are related. But the union’s messaging is terrible. It makes me wonder how crappy they are at actually negotiating for members.

Currently at the SEC but have seen the FDIC’s union agreement. I can confirm the FDIC union is absolutely crappy at negotiating.

Anonymous wrote:I think you don't get as much of an adrenaline rush from having temper tantrums directed at a computer monitor, versus having them in person.

I can see that but apparently try the GC was stupid enough to leave his temper tantrum at least in part in a voicemail. How that guy is qualified to be GC of anything is beyond me.

I think you don't get as much of an adrenaline rush from having temper tantrums directed at a computer monitor, versus having them in person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread has jumped the shark. Across the Administration, the business world, and banking in particular, there has been a clear move to RTO. That's what is driving the FDIC RTO, not some bizarre sexual harassment-driven fantasy you nut cases have conjured up.

actually, i'm pretty sure that across the administration, the business world, and banking in particular, there are tons of middle managers utterly frustrated by the lack of affair partners and the ability to say "sorry, dear, i have to be at the office late tonight!"

Nice try at trolling.

I like how none of these AH have offered up their resignation, even that GC that had a temper tantrum and cost the agency $100K.

Anonymous wrote:This thread has jumped the shark. Across the Administration, the business world, and banking in particular, there has been a clear move to RTO. That's what is driving the FDIC RTO, not some bizarre sexual harassment-driven fantasy you nut cases have conjured up.

actually, i'm pretty sure that across the administration, the business world, and banking in particular, there are tons of middle managers utterly frustrated by the lack of affair partners and the ability to say "sorry, dear, i have to be at the office late tonight!"

Anonymous wrote:This thread has jumped the shark. Across the Administration, the business world, and banking in particular, there has been a clear move to RTO. That's what is driving the FDIC RTO, not some bizarre sexual harassment-driven fantasy you nut cases have conjured up.

Jeff Zients found this thread. I tons lots of people who are fully remote, but they're at companies that aren't beholden to the CRE industry.

This thread has jumped the shark. Across the Administration, the business world, and banking in particular, there has been a clear move to RTO. That's what is driving the FDIC RTO, not some bizarre sexual harassment-driven fantasy you nut cases have conjured up.

Anonymous wrote:The only conceivable explanation for management’s obsession with RTO is bc they want to be in the same room with females. Which is creepy.

There is a really bizarre obsession among management at FDIC with having lots of pointless in-person meetings. As a male, I can't speak to the motivation you've expressed, but if there are going to be lots of meetings where nothing gets done, I'd much prefer to have them by Teams.