Anonymous wrote:It’s all this pop-psych stuff encouraging everyone to only engage in people/activities that bring them joy, that are net positives for their happiness, vs. net negatives. So since it’s easier to ghost you and “hard” stuff isn’t their jam, that’s what they do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My social calendar stays full, I receive more invites than I ever have time to attend. I'm blessed to have many other interests besides my job (that I do enjoy), and my friends and loved ones spend hours speaking with me every week.
I'm sad for you that you don't get to enjoy this same experience. I honestly think that maybe the people you're reaching out to can sense your inauthenticity, hence why they don't respond. Instead of casting such wide nets to everyone in your social circles all the time, maybe try to focus on connecting with and building deeper relationships with those whose company you truly enjoy (mutual) and who you truly want to get to know better. Those few will be more likely to respond when you reach out, as your connection grows.
Are your "friends" as smug and condescending as you? You sound insufferable.
Call it what you want OP. At least I'm not on a message board getting defensive with complete strangers and wondering why the people in my life ignore my communications and offers to spend time with them.
I gave you some sincere nuggets of valuable advice. Take what you want and leave the rest. Or not. I could care less either way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one owes you a response. That's a very entitled way of thinking. The silence is a no or what a rude question or why are you asking me this for the 5th time. Silence says volumes but you're not listening
If you ask a direct question you are absolutely owed a respond. Unless you’re a heathen with no manners.
Agree if it’s a personalized message to one or two people. But if I send a group text to the book club - one of the examples- saying “does anyone want to go hiking” please only reply if interested and available. I don’t need 16 “nos” to everyone in the text thread.
Anonymous wrote:Op, I get your frustration. I invited a group of women to a party at our house. Two of 12 responded no, and 10 did not rsvp at all. I had lots of other guests so the party well. But here's what bothered me more... we meet once a month (have for 5 years) and not a single person thanked me for the invitation, asked how the party was, said they were sorry they missed it, or of the 10, said they were sorry they had forgotten to rsvp!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one owes you a response. That's a very entitled way of thinking. The silence is a no or what a rude question or why are you asking me this for the 5th time. Silence says volumes but you're not listening
If you ask a direct question you are absolutely owed a respond. Unless you’re a heathen with no manners.
Anonymous wrote:Just in the last week or so . . . .
Asked a friend if her daughter would ever be interested in babysitting, because I need to add to my roster. No response. Which could mean no. Or it could mean any number of things that I can only guess because absent a “no” nothing is clear.
YOU SHOULD ASK THE DAUGHTER DIRECTLY.
Asked some neighbors if they wanted to attend something (I have an extra ticket), and specifically asked for a response one way or the other because the event is soon. The first response was a generic emoji that didn’t actually answer. I followed up two days later and I got a “checking “ response. Several days later, still no answer so I found someone else. Still never heard back from my neighbor - for all I know they plan to attend and I’ll get a text from them the day of asking about it!
IF YOU NEEDED TO KNOW BY A DEADLINE, YOU SHOULD HAVE SET A DEADLINE WITH THEM . IT’S UNCLEAR WHAT YOU MEAN BY “ASKED”. IF YOU MEAN THAT YOU TEXTED — THEN YOU SHOULD HAVE STATED AN RSVP DATE. IF YOU “ASKED” VERBALLY, THEN YOUR WRITTEN REMINDER SHOULD HAVE INCLUDED A DEADLINE. YES, THEY SHOULD RESPOND, BUT THEY HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING IF YOUR “SOON” IS THE SAME AS THEIRS.
Sent a message to my book club asking if anyone wanted to join me doing something. Got one yes, great. Got another response from someone who was busy but otherwise interested. Also great - at least have an understanding about this person. Zero response from everyone else. So again, I’m left to guess. Did they just not like the activity? Interested but busy? Who knows.
YOU ASKED A GENERAL QUESTION OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE. EXPECT THAT THE PEOPLE WHO WILL CONTACT YOU WILL BE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE INTERESTED. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, ASK THEM IN A CONVERSATION — AND RECOGNIZE THAT YOUR PRIORITIES AND TIMELINES ARE NOT UNIVERSALLY SHARED.
WTF? No wonder there are so many people who feel lonely, isolated , disassociated, etc. No one can bother to put in bare minimum effort to communicate. And so many people think that it’s okay to just forget to respond. No, it’s not, it’s rude. To leave it to someone else to have to follow up or wonder what you’re thinking, when all you need to do is spend 5 seconds typing “no thank you “ or “no, I’m not interested “ is not okay! It’s one thing thing to get busy and be delayed in responding. Or to use silence as a response with someone who can’t accept boundaries or take “no” as an answer. But why is it socially acceptable to drop the ball in all manner of communication?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My social calendar stays full, I receive more invites than I ever have time to attend. I'm blessed to have many other interests besides my job (that I do enjoy), and my friends and loved ones spend hours speaking with me every week.
I'm sad for you that you don't get to enjoy this same experience. I honestly think that maybe the people you're reaching out to can sense your inauthenticity, hence why they don't respond. Instead of casting such wide nets to everyone in your social circles all the time, maybe try to focus on connecting with and building deeper relationships with those whose company you truly enjoy (mutual) and who you truly want to get to know better. Those few will be more likely to respond when you reach out, as your connection grows.
Are your "friends" as smug and condescending as you? You sound insufferable.
Call it what you want OP. At least I'm not on a message board getting defensive with complete strangers and wondering why the people in my life ignore my communications and offers to spend time with them.
I gave you some sincere nuggets of valuable advice. Take what you want and leave the rest. Or not. I could care less either way.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody is obligated to answer your questions. Just assume the answer is no and stop bothering people!
Anonymous wrote:I suspect:
1.) Sometimes people are so overwhelmed they don't get to everything or they forget.
2.) Some people don't handle "no" well and will make a snide comment, or follow up with more invites or give a guilt trip. Sometimes "no, thank you" is not enough and they want to know why and will further probe.
I consider no response an answer and it tells me not to ask again. I might give one more chance if I think the person just is overwhelmed, otherwise, I see it as "no, and please don't ask again."
Anonymous wrote:No one owes you a response. That's a very entitled way of thinking. The silence is a no or what a rude question or why are you asking me this for the 5th time. Silence says volumes but you're not listening
Anonymous wrote:No one owes you a response. That's a very entitled way of thinking. The silence is a no or what a rude question or why are you asking me this for the 5th time. Silence says volumes but you're not listening