Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Which did you pick and why?
OP here.
Grand Highlander Hybrid Max
Only one that didn’t require a sacrifice in efficiency (27 mpg), performance, or space.
Other serious contenders were the Mazda CX 90 and the Telluride.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi OP,
Have been considering Grand Highlander, and maybe the Lexus TX (used, in 1-2 years). Neither were IIHS top safety picks (TX is new but based on GH framework so they treated the same). Any thoughts on the safety of GH?
OP here.
I bought before the safety testing was conducted.
GH did pretty well overall and its primary shortcoming (“acceptable” rating) related to possible risk to the driver (me).
Would I buy it again? Yes.
Different story if the issue put passengers (kids) at risk.
PS— Also, likely that Toyota will address the issue for 2025 model year.
So if you wait a year, might get improved rating.
Anonymous wrote:Why is the Kia telluride so slow?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi OP,
Have been considering Grand Highlander, and maybe the Lexus TX (used, in 1-2 years). Neither were IIHS top safety picks (TX is new but based on GH framework so they treated the same). Any thoughts on the safety of GH?
OP here.
I bought before the safety testing was conducted.
GH did pretty well overall and its primary shortcoming (“acceptable” rating) related to possible risk to the driver (me).
Would I buy it again? Yes.
Different story if the issue put passengers (kids) at risk.
Anonymous wrote:Hi OP,
Have been considering Grand Highlander, and maybe the Lexus TX (used, in 1-2 years). Neither were IIHS top safety picks (TX is new but based on GH framework so they treated the same). Any thoughts on the safety of GH?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did you rule out the Atlas?
OP.
Liked the space.
Hated the touch screen controls for all functions (no button options).
Meh driving experience.
But you went with the Toyota? Bwahahahaha. Driving experience was a total dealbreaker for us wrt to the Toyota.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for this thread, OP. We have an opportunity to choose between Max platinum and platinum. Max platinum is about $5k more expensive, but provide better city mileage. There is not much difference between the two models in terms of highway mileage. Did you consider Platinum? What made you choose Max platinum over platinum? Thanks.
Sry--just saw this.
I chose Max Limited over regular Limited for 2 reasons:
1. I wanted the better fuel economy from Max. Figured that the fuel savings would cover the price difference over the life of the car.
2. The Max is more fun and easier to drive. Merging or turning into traffic is SO easy because of the acceleration.
I should note that so far, fuel economy on my Max has been around 24 mpg. 95% city driving.
Not sure if the estimated fuel economy is high, or if I just have a lead foot.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for this thread, OP. We have an opportunity to choose between Max platinum and platinum. Max platinum is about $5k more expensive, but provide better city mileage. There is not much difference between the two models in terms of highway mileage. Did you consider Platinum? What made you choose Max platinum over platinum? Thanks.