Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't have to respect their beliefs, but there is no way to respectfully ask people to refrain from praying. They will be offended. There's a big difference between not being religious and being so offended by other people's religion that you fee compelled to prevent them from practicing it in your presence.
Exactly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I invite people I care about to enjoy a meal with me at my home or a restaurant, I want them to be comfortable and I want to enjoy time in their presence.
At home, being a host isn’t about the host imposing their rules on their guests. The host is supposed to accommodate their guests.
I don’t tell anyone what they can or cannot do in regards to their beliefs. If I invited a vegan to my home, am I going to insist that they eat meat because I do and my wishes are running the get together, because I am the host? No, I accommodate my guest by serving vegan dishes, because I invited my vegan guest to dinner. When I invite someone to my house, I am making a huge effort to provide them with a nice memory.
I consider it a privilege for my friends to feel comfortable around me and to live their lives authentically.
If I care about someone enough to schedule a meal with them as a pleasant activity, the last thing I am going to do is stress out over prayer and who tells who what to do, etc.
You are going to make a big deal and ruin a get together over something that isn’t a big deal? Somehow I don’t think people who would do this really respect or care about their friends or family.
And remember: the host accommodates the guests, not the other way around.
Disagree in these circumstances
If you personally as a host want to accommodate your vegan guests by planning a vegan centric menu then that’s great for you. Nevertheless if a vegan is invited to a dinner as one of a larger group it’s just plain rude for them to expect/request the host prepare a vegan-centric meal or to make a big show over their diet restrictions during the meal. The same principle is true for an invited dinner guest expecting everyone to accommodate them in observing a collective prayer before a meal rather than just discretely saying a silent prayer themselves.
On the flip side, as a vegan hosting a meal you shouldn’t be expected to prepare meat dishes for your carnivore loving friends and should feel free to serve them a meal adapted to your diet, just as you should be free to continue to observe a tradition of saying a collective grace before a meal in your own home even if guests are present m.
I think the equivalent situation here would be for the vegan to bring their own food which is appropriate if the host has not prepared any or enough vegan food (say, the guest wants something with protein and not just lettuce and carrots). If the food is not vegan, the vegan cannot eat, due to their beliefs. Similarly, the religious person does not feel right eating without saying a prayer thanking God. In both cases, the vegan/prayerful person should be respectful and quiet, not making a big show. However, they should be able to say a verbal prayer if they wish, or explain they have their own tofu dish, and everyone should respect them with no obligation to participate.
Mostly agree but (as you suggest) the vegan/praying guests should strive to be as unobtrusive as possible in meeting their specific needs without unduly imposing on others or usurping the host.
As a Christian myself I’d personally reject the idea that a prayer before meals must be voiced out loud in front of a non religious group and certainly wouldn’t expect others to wait to eat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you should go with the hosts preference. That is the polite thing to do. At the same time, I would not object to a friend wanting to say grace in my home. If everyone is reasonable, then things are fine. But as the another post in this forum shows, many people here feel like it's their RIGHT to do whatever/whenever in the name of freedom.
There's a big difference between not being religious and being so offended by other people's religion that you feel compelled to prevent them from practicing it in your presence.
Why would you not want your friends to say a 15-30 prayer of gratitude and thanks in your home (where you invited them to be) and respect their beliefs?
People DO have the freedom to practice their religion (or to not practice a religion) and it’s a great privilege to have the freedom to do so.
Why are we against freedom?
Why is freedom a bad thing?
People are free to speak and practice whatever religion they choose- or choose to not practice a religion.
I don’t think I have ever encountered people who think this is a negative thing before, ever.
“The constitutional freedom of religion [is] the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights." --Thomas Jefferson: Virginia Board of Visitors Minutes, 1819.
"Among the most inestimable of our blessings, also, is that... of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support." --Thomas Jefferson: Reply to John Thomas et al., 1807.
"In our early struggles for liberty, religious freedom could not fail to become a primary object." --Thomas Jefferson to Baltimore Baptists, 1808.
"Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted." --Thomas Jefferson to P. H. Wendover, 1815.
"One of the amendments to the Constitution... expressly declares that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch that whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the others." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.
I mean sure, but the rest of us don't have to sit around quietly with our heads bowed. If someone at my table wants to say a prayer silently before they eat with their head bowed and hands folded, go for it. I don't feel the need to stop my conversation with the person next to me for that and bow my head along with them. That's my freedom not to and I'm sure you agree with me.
Anonymous wrote:Agree with the second person. Just keep your stuff to yourself. Certainly, your God can hear you saying grace in your head. Not much need to impose it on others, is there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you should go with the hosts preference. That is the polite thing to do. At the same time, I would not object to a friend wanting to say grace in my home. If everyone is reasonable, then things are fine. But as the another post in this forum shows, many people here feel like it's their RIGHT to do whatever/whenever in the name of freedom.
There's a big difference between not being religious and being so offended by other people's religion that you feel compelled to prevent them from practicing it in your presence.
Why would you not want your friends to say a 15-30 prayer of gratitude and thanks in your home (where you invited them to be) and respect their beliefs?
People DO have the freedom to practice their religion (or to not practice a religion) and it’s a great privilege to have the freedom to do so.
Why are we against freedom?
Why is freedom a bad thing?
People are free to speak and practice whatever religion they choose- or choose to not practice a religion.
I don’t think I have ever encountered people who think this is a negative thing before, ever.
“The constitutional freedom of religion [is] the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights." --Thomas Jefferson: Virginia Board of Visitors Minutes, 1819.
"Among the most inestimable of our blessings, also, is that... of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support." --Thomas Jefferson: Reply to John Thomas et al., 1807.
"In our early struggles for liberty, religious freedom could not fail to become a primary object." --Thomas Jefferson to Baltimore Baptists, 1808.
"Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted." --Thomas Jefferson to P. H. Wendover, 1815.
"One of the amendments to the Constitution... expressly declares that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch that whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the others." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you should go with the hosts preference. That is the polite thing to do. At the same time, I would not object to a friend wanting to say grace in my home. If everyone is reasonable, then things are fine. But as the another post in this forum shows, many people here feel like it's their RIGHT to do whatever/whenever in the name of freedom.
There's a big difference between not being religious and being so offended by other people's religion that you feel compelled to prevent them from practicing it in your presence.
Why would you not want your friends to say a 15-30 prayer of gratitude and thanks in your home (where you invited them to be) and respect their beliefs?
People DO have the freedom to practice their religion (or to not practice a religion) and it’s a great privilege to have the freedom to do so.
Why are we against freedom?
Why is freedom a bad thing?
People are free to speak and practice whatever religion they choose- or choose to not practice a religion.
I don’t think I have ever encountered people who think this is a negative thing before, ever.
“The constitutional freedom of religion [is] the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights." --Thomas Jefferson: Virginia Board of Visitors Minutes, 1819.
"Among the most inestimable of our blessings, also, is that... of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support." --Thomas Jefferson: Reply to John Thomas et al., 1807.
"In our early struggles for liberty, religious freedom could not fail to become a primary object." --Thomas Jefferson to Baltimore Baptists, 1808.
"Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted." --Thomas Jefferson to P. H. Wendover, 1815.
"One of the amendments to the Constitution... expressly declares that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch that whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the others." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.
Hey, as long as you don’t object to my sacrificing a white cock at your next dinner party, as per my religious beliefs, we’re all good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you should go with the hosts preference. That is the polite thing to do. At the same time, I would not object to a friend wanting to say grace in my home. If everyone is reasonable, then things are fine. But as the another post in this forum shows, many people here feel like it's their RIGHT to do whatever/whenever in the name of freedom.
There's a big difference between not being religious and being so offended by other people's religion that you feel compelled to prevent them from practicing it in your presence.
Why would you not want your friends to say a 15-30 prayer of gratitude and thanks in your home (where you invited them to be) and respect their beliefs?
People DO have the freedom to practice their religion (or to not practice a religion) and it’s a great privilege to have the freedom to do so.
Why are we against freedom?
Why is freedom a bad thing?
People are free to speak and practice whatever religion they choose- or choose to not practice a religion.
I don’t think I have ever encountered people who think this is a negative thing before, ever.
“The constitutional freedom of religion [is] the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights." --Thomas Jefferson: Virginia Board of Visitors Minutes, 1819.
"Among the most inestimable of our blessings, also, is that... of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support." --Thomas Jefferson: Reply to John Thomas et al., 1807.
"In our early struggles for liberty, religious freedom could not fail to become a primary object." --Thomas Jefferson to Baltimore Baptists, 1808.
"Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted." --Thomas Jefferson to P. H. Wendover, 1815.
"One of the amendments to the Constitution... expressly declares that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch that whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the others." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you should go with the hosts preference. That is the polite thing to do. At the same time, I would not object to a friend wanting to say grace in my home. If everyone is reasonable, then things are fine. But as the another post in this forum shows, many people here feel like it's their RIGHT to do whatever/whenever in the name of freedom.
There's a big difference between not being religious and being so offended by other people's religion that you feel compelled to prevent them from practicing it in your presence.
Why would you not want your friends to say a 15-30 prayer of gratitude and thanks in your home (where you invited them to be) and respect their beliefs?
People DO have the freedom to practice their religion (or to not practice a religion) and it’s a great privilege to have the freedom to do so.
Why are we against freedom?
Why is freedom a bad thing?
People are free to speak and practice whatever religion they choose- or choose to not practice a religion.
I don’t think I have ever encountered people who think this is a negative thing before, ever.
“The constitutional freedom of religion [is] the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights." --Thomas Jefferson: Virginia Board of Visitors Minutes, 1819.
"Among the most inestimable of our blessings, also, is that... of liberty to worship our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and yet proved by our experience to be its best support." --Thomas Jefferson: Reply to John Thomas et al., 1807.
"In our early struggles for liberty, religious freedom could not fail to become a primary object." --Thomas Jefferson to Baltimore Baptists, 1808.
"Religion, as well as reason, confirms the soundness of those principles on which our government has been founded and its rights asserted." --Thomas Jefferson to P. H. Wendover, 1815.
"One of the amendments to the Constitution... expressly declares that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch that whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the others." --Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.
Anonymous wrote:I think you should go with the hosts preference. That is the polite thing to do. At the same time, I would not object to a friend wanting to say grace in my home. If everyone is reasonable, then things are fine. But as the another post in this forum shows, many people here feel like it's their RIGHT to do whatever/whenever in the name of freedom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't have to respect their beliefs, but there is no way to respectfully ask people to refrain from praying. They will be offended. There's a big difference between not being religious and being so offended by other people's religion that you fee compelled to prevent them from practicing it in your presence.
Exactly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I invite people I care about to enjoy a meal with me at my home or a restaurant, I want them to be comfortable and I want to enjoy time in their presence.
At home, being a host isn’t about the host imposing their rules on their guests. The host is supposed to accommodate their guests.
I don’t tell anyone what they can or cannot do in regards to their beliefs. If I invited a vegan to my home, am I going to insist that they eat meat because I do and my wishes are running the get together, because I am the host? No, I accommodate my guest by serving vegan dishes, because I invited my vegan guest to dinner. When I invite someone to my house, I am making a huge effort to provide them with a nice memory.
I consider it a privilege for my friends to feel comfortable around me and to live their lives authentically.
If I care about someone enough to schedule a meal with them as a pleasant activity, the last thing I am going to do is stress out over prayer and who tells who what to do, etc.
You are going to make a big deal and ruin a get together over something that isn’t a big deal? Somehow I don’t think people who would do this really respect or care about their friends or family.
And remember: the host accommodates the guests, not the other way around.
Disagree in these circumstances
If you personally as a host want to accommodate your vegan guests by planning a vegan centric menu then that’s great for you. Nevertheless if a vegan is invited to a dinner as one of a larger group it’s just plain rude for them to expect/request the host prepare a vegan-centric meal or to make a big show over their diet restrictions during the meal. The same principle is true for an invited dinner guest expecting everyone to accommodate them in observing a collective prayer before a meal rather than just discretely saying a silent prayer themselves.
On the flip side, as a vegan hosting a meal you shouldn’t be expected to prepare meat dishes for your carnivore loving friends and should feel free to serve them a meal adapted to your diet, just as you should be free to continue to observe a tradition of saying a collective grace before a meal in your own home even if guests are present m.
I think the equivalent situation here would be for the vegan to bring their own food which is appropriate if the host has not prepared any or enough vegan food (say, the guest wants something with protein and not just lettuce and carrots). If the food is not vegan, the vegan cannot eat, due to their beliefs. Similarly, the religious person does not feel right eating without saying a prayer thanking God. In both cases, the vegan/prayerful person should be respectful and quiet, not making a big show. However, they should be able to say a verbal prayer if they wish, or explain they have their own tofu dish, and everyone should respect them with no obligation to participate.
This is a great analogy, pp. Another analogy would be the Jewish or Muslim person bringing a chicken dish to the pig roast.