Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not to side track this, but for people who say their baby wouldn’t take a bottle - I just don’t get it.
I am pregnant with my first so zero experience. And my mom claims I was this way.
But two questions:
(1) did you try introducing bottle in first 2 weeks of life? That is what my night nurse who I am hiring told me we’d do … exactly to avoid this outcome.
(2) if you didn’t do (1) - which does seem to be a big issue) - what happens if you just don’t feed except offering bottle. Like why can’t you just….make it happen? I know that sounds profoundly ignorant in some ways but in other ways, I’m sorry, but won’t the baby eventually just give it a try out of …. Hunger?
Not taking a bottle literally won’t work in my lifestyle so my child would starve. I don’t get it.
My baby didn't latch on anything for the first two weeks -- we syringe fed her. She finally latched on the breast at around 3-4 weeks. Then when I went back to work at 4 months, she wouldn't take a bottle. We started at 3 months what you're suggesting -- I left the house and my husband offered a bottle. "Healthy babies don't let themselves starve," the pediatrician said. Well, the pediatrician had never met my baby, I guess, because she went 12 hours without eating (or drinking) before we got worried about dehydration and I came home and nursed her. We tried that several times before we gave up.
Your questions come across as very judgmental. It's easy to know all the things when you're pregnant -- wait until you have an actual baby.
I mean, I acknowledged my ignorance in my post. I am not saying I KNOW or that I am judging responses.
But you do realize the logical conclusion of what you are saying? What about a baby that never had a Mom??? Like…that baby would definitionally starve? All the single Dads or gay male couples? What are they doing?
I guess I just have to believe this can be managed up front.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine telling your 9 year old that they never got a sibling because they were so difficult when they were an infant.
Sorry, in most cases, I don't think an only child situation is the ideal upbringing.
Why "in most cases" are single-child parents not providing their child an "ideal upbringing"?
Just google “is being an only child ideal?” I’m sure you’ll find a few things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine telling your 9 year old that they never got a sibling because they were so difficult when they were an infant.
Sorry, in most cases, I don't think an only child situation is the ideal upbringing.
Why "in most cases" are single-child parents not providing their child an "ideal upbringing"?
Anonymous wrote:Imagine telling your 9 year old that they never got a sibling because they were so difficult when they were an infant.
Sorry, in most cases, I don't think an only child situation is the ideal upbringing.
Anonymous wrote:Imagine telling your 9 year old that they never got a sibling because they were so difficult when they were an infant.
Sorry, in most cases, I don't think an only child situation is the ideal upbringing.
Anonymous wrote:I have 3 kids and for each one the baby stage was easier than the one before it. My first was very difficult in terms of waking 3-4x overnight for 2 years & sleeping a max of 12 hours/day ever. She is still low sleep needs as a 9 year old. I’m honestly not sure if it is purely happenstance that each got easier or the later ones somehow detected my lower anxiety or if experience just made me less anxious even though everything was actually the same. But there is no question that each was easier than the last. They are all also very different, so I wouldn’t assume past is prologue for you.
All that said, I don’t think any of the above applies if there are actually underlying medical issues. That is obviously not caused by parental anxiety and would be hard no matter what. That’s a crapshoot though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I absolutely believe there are parents who have very difficult babies. But I also know that there are parents who simply have a really tough time adjusting their lives to a baby and assume the baby itself is the problem.
FWIW, I'd wager more folks on here have encountered parents who fall in the latter category as opposed to the former and, as a result, resist the idea of truly difficult babies. Not an excuse, just an observation.
As someone whose first child had (undiscovered) medical issues that made sleep virtually impossible for the first 9 months, among other miserable issues, I totally agree. I learned not to mention anything to most people because their advice was comical. They definitely thought I was just lazy, didn't know what I was doing or a combination of the two. Having a 'normal' second baby has been so freeing.
What type of medical issue causes a baby to not sleep for 9 months?
I read this as sleep for the parents was virtually impossible.
Yes, this. Baby woke every 30-45 minutes all through the night and took hours to go to sleep. Undiscovered milk allergy until 6 months (none of the normal symptoms showed up until he randomly had blood in his stool one day) and then had a cyst in his intestine that eventually caused a total bowel blockage requiring emergency surgery. Awful, awful first year.