Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory parks dumb kids in Oxford? LOL for two years? LOL

Oxford college students have the same, if not higher, stats...It's just a liberal arts college.

DP

https://apply.emory.edu/discover/facts-stats/first-year.html

But still, great point. That 1/100th of one grade point probably results in a massive differential from one campus to the other.

Yup 2 yesrs in the middle of nowhere.

Compared to that, 1 semester or 1year study abroad in the places like London, Paris, Madrid etc. even Oakland sound better and student stats are not significantly lower, just a fraction like you said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory parks dumb kids in Oxford? LOL for two years? LOL

Oxford college students have the same, if not higher, stats...It's just a liberal arts college.

DP

https://apply.emory.edu/discover/facts-stats/first-year.html

But still, great point. That 1/100th of one grade point probably results in a massive differential from one campus to the other.

Yup 2 yesrs in the middle of nowhere.

Compared to that, 1 semester or 1year study abroad in the places like London, Paris, Madrid etc. even Oakland sound better and student stats are not significantly lower, just a fraction like you said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory parks dumb kids in Oxford? LOL for two years? LOL

Oxford college students have the same, if not higher, stats...It's just a liberal arts college.

DP

https://apply.emory.edu/discover/facts-stats/first-year.html

But still, great point. That 1/100th of one grade point probably results in a massive differential from one campus to the other.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory parks dumb kids in Oxford? LOL for two years? LOL

Oxford college students have the same, if not higher, stats...It's just a liberal arts college.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory parks dumb kids in Oxford? LOL for two years? LOL

Oxford college students have the same, if not higher, stats...It's just a liberal arts college.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:emory is the northeastern of the south

Northeastern is more diverse and dynamic in a much better location, and produces better outcome.

You're hilarious. Take out the overenrolled stuffed CS courses and see how good the outcomes from Northeastern are.

Northeastern’s acceptance rate is close to MIT and Yale now. Much closer to these schools than what you’re thinking

They only had this happen, because they way over-admitted one year and needed to admit nearly half the amount the following year, because they otherwise would've had homeless students. They also farm applicants with an easy app and don't count their NU-Bound students, so they can collect dumb, rich kids without it affecting USNEWs. This school is no where near MIT or Yale. It's on the level of UMass Amherst.

They don't need dumb kids when they get 100k apps from high stat kids. Use your common sense.

Anonymous wrote:Emory parks dumb kids in Oxford? LOL for two years? LOL

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:emory is the northeastern of the south

Northeastern is more diverse and dynamic in a much better location, and produces better outcome.

You're hilarious. Take out the overenrolled stuffed CS courses and see how good the outcomes from Northeastern are.

Northeastern’s acceptance rate is close to MIT and Yale now. Much closer to these schools than what you’re thinking

They only had this happen, because they way over-admitted one year and needed to admit nearly half the amount the following year, because they otherwise would've had homeless students. They also farm applicants with an easy app and don't count their NU-Bound students, so they can collect dumb, rich kids without it affecting USNEWs. This school is no where near MIT or Yale. It's on the level of UMass Amherst.

THANK YOU! This poster is making complete sense with facts! I know of one run of the mill student from my kid’s school who got into NU a few years back with a 1320 SAT…the kid’s mother stated the campus was grossly over-crowded and made for a poor experience that year. The following year, when NU was faced with having to offer enrollment to fewer applicants this scenario resulted in giving the false impression that NU was an extremely selective school and NU ran with it. You couple this “manufactured” selectivity with
a no supplemental essay(s) application, no standardized test requirement, and other marketing/enrollment ploys and the result is a low acceptance rate. There are several good college admission books that go into detail how NU employed a massive marketing campaign to move up the USNWR rankings.

ARe you talking about Northwestern?? NU = Northwestern
If so, I don't thnk its grossly overcrowded and they do have supplmentals.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:emory is the northeastern of the south

Northeastern is more diverse and dynamic in a much better location, and produces better outcome.

You're hilarious. Take out the overenrolled stuffed CS courses and see how good the outcomes from Northeastern are.

Northeastern’s acceptance rate is close to MIT and Yale now. Much closer to these schools than what you’re thinking

They only had this happen, because they way over-admitted one year and needed to admit nearly half the amount the following year, because they otherwise would've had homeless students. They also farm applicants with an easy app and don't count their NU-Bound students, so they can collect dumb, rich kids without it affecting USNEWs. This school is no where near MIT or Yale. It's on the level of UMass Amherst.

They don't need dumb kids when they get 100k apps from high stat kids. Use your common sense.

Northeastern is a fine school. And its Co op program is interesting and helpful. But let's not kid ourselves. As a PP said NE is just above the UMass flagship. It is not at all Harvard, MIT, BC, Tufts, or even sucks to BU (nor any of the MA SLACs). It is a great school and a great option but let's not go crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In great part of Atlanta - nice well funded campus, great weather.
Students from everywhere
Strong in range of areas- science to business

There is no great part of Atlanta anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:emory is the northeastern of the south

Northeastern is more diverse and dynamic in a much better location, and produces better outcome.

You're hilarious. Take out the overenrolled stuffed CS courses and see how good the outcomes from Northeastern are.

Northeastern’s acceptance rate is close to MIT and Yale now. Much closer to these schools than what you’re thinking

They only had this happen, because they way over-admitted one year and needed to admit nearly half the amount the following year, because they otherwise would've had homeless students. They also farm applicants with an easy app and don't count their NU-Bound students, so they can collect dumb, rich kids without it affecting USNEWs. This school is no where near MIT or Yale. It's on the level of UMass Amherst.

They don't need dumb kids when they get 100k apps from high stat kids. Use your common sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:emory is the northeastern of the south

Northeastern is more diverse and dynamic in a much better location, and produces better outcome.

You're hilarious. Take out the overenrolled stuffed CS courses and see how good the outcomes from Northeastern are.

Northeastern’s acceptance rate is close to MIT and Yale now. Much closer to these schools than what you’re thinking

They only had this happen, because they way over-admitted one year and needed to admit nearly half the amount the following year, because they otherwise would've had homeless students. They also farm applicants with an easy app and don't count their NU-Bound students, so they can collect dumb, rich kids without it affecting USNEWs. This school is no where near MIT or Yale. It's on the level of UMass Amherst.

THANK YOU! This poster is making complete sense with facts! I know of one run of the mill student from my kid’s school who got into NU a few years back with a 1320 SAT…the kid’s mother stated the campus was grossly over-crowded and made for a poor experience that year. The following year, when NU was faced with having to offer enrollment to fewer applicants this scenario resulted in giving the false impression that NU was an extremely selective school and NU ran with it. You couple this “manufactured” selectivity with
a no supplemental essay(s) application, no standardized test requirement, and other marketing/enrollment ploys and the result is a low acceptance rate. There are several good college admission books that go into detail how NU employed a massive marketing campaign to move up the USNWR rankings.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:emory is the northeastern of the south

Northeastern is more diverse and dynamic in a much better location, and produces better outcome.

You're hilarious. Take out the overenrolled stuffed CS courses and see how good the outcomes from Northeastern are.

Northeastern’s acceptance rate is close to MIT and Yale now. Much closer to these schools than what you’re thinking

They only had this happen, because they way over-admitted one year and needed to admit nearly half the amount the following year, because they otherwise would've had homeless students. They also farm applicants with an easy app and don't count their NU-Bound students, so they can collect dumb, rich kids without it affecting USNEWs. This school is no where near MIT or Yale. It's on the level of UMass Amherst.