Anonymous
10/19/2023 15:40
Subject: Re:Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perry is another who will refuse to jail violent offenders and just keep releasing them back onto our streets.
OMG stop with the boogie man myth. She was a prosecutor who put away lots of bad people, especially those who committed violence against women. She has the support of the police. Sorry, we don't want MAGA.
She is pro crime.
Of course she tries to hide that fact with euphemisms such as “pro criminal-justice reform.” But what she really means is she will vote in lockstep with her party for:
- early release of violent offenders back into your street
- ending cash bail, or put another way: catch and release the same day
- defunding the police
- preventing the police from pursuing criminals, just like in Baltimore, DC, etc
These are the measures she supports when she claims to be “pro criminal-justice reform.”
Oh yes, prosecutors are well known for being pro crime. It keeps them employed!
/s
- except prosecutor Chesa Boudin: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chesa_Boudin
Want to keep arguing most progressive prosecutors, like now-recalled Chesa, actually result in skyrocketing crime rates? - because that is what they do.
Read the wiki.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 13:04
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you mean if it's true? I've seen this commercial at least a dozen times just this morning.
Then how nice of him to give his wife permission to have the appropriate, doctor-recommended procedure after a miscarriage. What a great guy.
What does this have to do with abortion, I wonder?
DP. When I had a D&C after a miscarriage, it was on the chart as "missed abortion" - the clinical term. Maybe the terminology confused this guy? All the more reason he doesn't belong in office passing laws that regulate people's choices in reproductive health care.
Here’s the thing: he actually invented a tech company intended to help expectant mothers. So prenatal care is in his wheelhouse.
He’s also VERY Catholic. Went to Notre Dame and the whole lot. So of course he is strongly anti abortion. The amount of political donations he has accepted from hard-right groups that want a total ban on abortion is eye-popping — well over $100,000.
But mainly he’s a carpetbagger and GOP plant who is there to try and win and further Youngkin’s political ambitions.
Hard pass.
She got way more money this past month though. And not from her Daddy.
She did. She's finishing strong. His backers seem to have concluded he's toast.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:55
Subject: Re:Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perry is another who will refuse to jail violent offenders and just keep releasing them back onto our streets.
OMG stop with the boogie man myth. She was a prosecutor who put away lots of bad people, especially those who committed violence against women. She has the support of the police. Sorry, we don't want MAGA.
She is pro crime.
Of course she tries to hide that fact with euphemisms such as “pro criminal-justice reform.” But what she really means is she will vote in lockstep with her party for:
- early release of violent offenders back into your street
- ending cash bail, or put another way: catch and release the same day
- defunding the police
- preventing the police from pursuing criminals, just like in Baltimore, DC, etc
These are the measures she supports when she claims to be “pro criminal-justice reform.”
Oh yes, prosecutors are well known for being pro crime. It keeps them employed!
/s
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:50
Subject: Re:Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perry is another who will refuse to jail violent offenders and just keep releasing them back onto our streets.
OMG stop with the boogie man myth. She was a prosecutor who put away lots of bad people, especially those who committed violence against women. She has the support of the police. Sorry, we don't want MAGA.
She is pro crime.
Of course she tries to hide that fact with euphemisms such as “pro criminal-justice reform.” But what she really means is she will vote in lockstep with her party for:
- early release of violent offenders back into your street
- ending cash bail, or put another way: catch and release the same day
- defunding the police
- preventing the police from pursuing criminals, just like in Baltimore, DC, etc
These are the measures she supports when she claims to be “pro criminal-justice reform.”
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:48
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you mean if it's true? I've seen this commercial at least a dozen times just this morning.
Then how nice of him to give his wife permission to have the appropriate, doctor-recommended procedure after a miscarriage. What a great guy.
What does this have to do with abortion, I wonder?
DP. When I had a D&C after a miscarriage, it was on the chart as "missed abortion" - the clinical term. Maybe the terminology confused this guy? All the more reason he doesn't belong in office passing laws that regulate people's choices in reproductive health care.
Here’s the thing: he actually invented a tech company intended to help expectant mothers. So prenatal care is in his wheelhouse.
He’s also VERY Catholic. Went to Notre Dame and the whole lot. So of course he is strongly anti abortion. The amount of political donations he has accepted from hard-right groups that want a total ban on abortion is eye-popping — well over $100,000.
But mainly he’s a carpetbagger and GOP plant who is there to try and win and further Youngkin’s political ambitions.
Hard pass.
Yeesh. That's terrible.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:45
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you mean if it's true? I've seen this commercial at least a dozen times just this morning.
Then how nice of him to give his wife permission to have the appropriate, doctor-recommended procedure after a miscarriage. What a great guy.
What does this have to do with abortion, I wonder?
DP. When I had a D&C after a miscarriage, it was on the chart as "missed abortion" - the clinical term. Maybe the terminology confused this guy? All the more reason he doesn't belong in office passing laws that regulate people's choices in reproductive health care.
Here’s the thing: he actually invented a tech company intended to help expectant mothers. So prenatal care is in his wheelhouse.
He’s also VERY Catholic. Went to Notre Dame and the whole lot. So of course he is strongly anti abortion. The amount of political donations he has accepted from hard-right groups that want a total ban on abortion is eye-popping — well over $100,000.
But mainly he’s a carpetbagger and GOP plant who is there to try and win and further Youngkin’s political ambitions.
Hard pass.
She got way more money this past month though. And not from her Daddy.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:40
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you mean if it's true? I've seen this commercial at least a dozen times just this morning.
Then how nice of him to give his wife permission to have the appropriate, doctor-recommended procedure after a miscarriage. What a great guy.
What does this have to do with abortion, I wonder?
DP. When I had a D&C after a miscarriage, it was on the chart as "missed abortion" - the clinical term. Maybe the terminology confused this guy? All the more reason he doesn't belong in office passing laws that regulate people's choices in reproductive health care.
Here’s the thing: he actually invented a tech company intended to help expectant mothers. So prenatal care is in his wheelhouse.
He’s also VERY Catholic. Went to Notre Dame and the whole lot. So of course he is strongly anti abortion. The amount of political donations he has accepted from hard-right groups that want a total ban on abortion is eye-popping — well over $100,000.
But mainly he’s a carpetbagger and GOP plant who is there to try and win and further Youngkin’s political ambitions.
Hard pass.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:33
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you mean if it's true? I've seen this commercial at least a dozen times just this morning.
Then how nice of him to give his wife permission to have the appropriate, doctor-recommended procedure after a miscarriage. What a great guy.
What does this have to do with abortion, I wonder?
DP. When I had a D&C after a miscarriage, it was on the chart as "missed abortion" - the clinical term. Maybe the terminology confused this guy? All the more reason he doesn't belong in office passing laws that regulate people's choices in reproductive health care.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:24
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:What do you mean if it's true? I've seen this commercial at least a dozen times just this morning.
Then how nice of him to give his wife permission to have the appropriate, doctor-recommended procedure after a miscarriage. What a great guy.
What does this have to do with abortion, I wonder?
Anonymous
10/19/2023 12:14
Subject: Re:Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perry is another who will refuse to jail violent offenders and just keep releasing them back onto our streets.
She was a literal prosecutor who put people in prison.
We literally have Steve Descano here in Fairfax, and the ONLY people he tries to put in prison are police officers.
All other criminals are released by our “prosecutor,” Descano.
Perry will only work to pass laws like banning the police from pursuing criminals (as it is in DC) and legalizing aggressive panhandling like Alexandria is trying to do.
If Steve Descano is your CA, then you don’t live in the district and your opinion doesn’t matter.
Not to mention there were nearly 1,800 felony charges from Descano’s office in 2022.
PP is grasping at straws.
Just a reminder: Loudoun prosecuted two school administrators for MISDEMEANORS.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 11:39
Subject: Re:Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perry is another who will refuse to jail violent offenders and just keep releasing them back onto our streets.
She was a literal prosecutor who put people in prison.
We literally have Steve Descano here in Fairfax, and the ONLY people he tries to put in prison are police officers.
All other criminals are released by our “prosecutor,” Descano.
Perry will only work to pass laws like banning the police from pursuing criminals (as it is in DC) and legalizing aggressive panhandling like Alexandria is trying to do.
If Steve Descano is your CA, then you don’t live in the district and your opinion doesn’t matter.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 10:46
Subject: Perry v Segura
What do you mean if it's true? I've seen this commercial at least a dozen times just this morning.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 10:22
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Segura just trotted out his wife in a commercial to say he was supportive of her "choice" to have a D&C "abortion" after her miscarriage. Such a great guy.
If true that is … craven, exploitative and wild. And not germane. And shows how terrified he is that the abortion issue trumps his phantom menace messaging about crime on the mean streets of Leesburg.
But I have a hard time believing it’s true.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 10:06
Subject: Perry v Segura
Anonymous wrote:Segura just trotted out his wife in a commercial to say he was supportive of her "choice" to have a D&C "abortion" after her miscarriage. Such a great guy.
Link? If true, that's really ... something. Yikes.
Anonymous
10/19/2023 10:02
Subject: Perry v Segura
Segura just trotted out his wife in a commercial to say he was supportive of her "choice" to have a D&C "abortion" after her miscarriage. Such a great guy.