Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth will be less affected than Vanderbilt, Wash. U. and even Chicago.
Dartmouth in an Ivy, and the Ivy brand is way too strong globally. It's located in the wealthiest and most populous region of the US (Northeast) and will always attract wealthy students.
Anonymous wrote:Curious if the shift in rankings will have impact on applicant quality and volume at different schools. Even slight changes, like 1-2%, would be interesting. Some of the bigger developments that happened:
1. Penn, Duke, and Caltech created separation from the rest of the pack at the end of the T10, and restored their level bordering the T5 where they were ~1 decade ago
2. Brown finally broke into the T10, although at the bottom
3. UChicago plummeted out of the T10, and there's no reason to expect they'll get back in considering they've been ranked ~20 in most other rankings
4. Dartmouth and Vanderbilt both experienced significant drops to the end of the T20
5. Public schools in general rose, with the most noticeable rises at the top being Berkeley, UCLA, and UNC
6. The 2 New York ivies, Columbia and Cornell, are now tied, but don't look like they're breaking into the T10.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth will be less affected than Vanderbilt, Wash. U. and even Chicago.
Dartmouth in an Ivy, and the Ivy brand is way too strong globally. It's located in the wealthiest and most populous region of the US (Northeast) and will always attract wealthy students.
Dartmouth is now officially the lowest ranked Ivy
Yes and a few days ago there were two below Dartmouth. Totally agree that the ivy brand is worth more than the USNWR rankings. Would never pick a public college or most other privates over any Ivy!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth will be less affected than Vanderbilt, Wash. U. and even Chicago.
Dartmouth in an Ivy, and the Ivy brand is way too strong globally. It's located in the wealthiest and most populous region of the US (Northeast) and will always attract wealthy students.
Dartmouth is now officially the lowest ranked Ivy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good insight. I wondered why they cared.Anonymous wrote:DCUMers look at / discuss rankings like a hobby. Some like fantasy football, some like analyze USNWR rankings.
Live a little.
Well for those of us who have kids applying, it’s interesting to know what schools are on what trajectories. If a school is going up rather than down, it feels like a safer investment. But of course the acceptances need to come first
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth will be less affected than Vanderbilt, Wash. U. and even Chicago.
Dartmouth in an Ivy, and the Ivy brand is way too strong globally. It's located in the wealthiest and most populous region of the US (Northeast) and will always attract wealthy students.
Ivy brand may be Strong Globally for other Ivy schools (Even Cornell and Brown). But not Dartmouth!
Dartmouth rankings globally compared to peers:
US New Best Global Universities (2023):
Johns Hopkins: 10
Cornell: 21
Northwestern: 24
Vanderbilt 78
Brown: 129
Dartmouth: 261
QS Top Universities (2024):
Cornell: 13
Johns Hopkins: 28
Northwestern: 47
Brown: 73
Dartmouth: 237
Vanderbilt: 261
Times Higher Education - World University Rankings (2024) :
Johns Hopkins: 15
Cornell: 20
Northwestern: 28
Brown: 64
Vanderbilt: 92
Dartmouth: 161
Round University Ranking (2023):
Northwestern: 12
Cornell: 18
Johns Hopkins: 21
Brown: 32
Vanderbilt: 49
Dartmouth: 124
Ranking Web of Universities (2023):
Cornell: 7
Johns Hopkins: 12
Northwestern: 22
Vanderbilt: 59
Brown 79
Dartmouth: 160
Center for world universities rankings (2022-2023):
Cornell: 14
Johns Hopkins: 16
Northwestern: 17
Dartmouth: 41
Vanderbilt: 52
Brown: 66
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess this year's USNWR ranking really matters if you now place emphasis on the number of Pell Grant recipients when choosing a college
I do if a school has an endowment the size of a small country. I expect them to have the resources to recruit the best and brightest academically. They’ve always done that for athletes so I want to see that for all students.
TBH, these rich schools don't give a whit about the poor. They accept multiples of kids from families in the top quintile than in the bottom.
+1. More kids come from families in the top 1 percent than in the bottom 50 percent
for sure. for MOST kids, it takes money to have all these advantages. but this is why some of us also care about the Pell numbers and are happy to see this in these rankings. the time is over for just the WASPiest kids to walk in. I want to see the kids with merit to have access to the top, despite their ability to pay 90k year.
Anonymous wrote:If you give a puck about world rankings, raise your hand.
Anybody?
Anonymous wrote:If you give a puck about world rankings, raise your hand.
Anybody?
Anonymous wrote:Dartmouth will be less affected than Vanderbilt, Wash. U. and even Chicago.
Dartmouth in an Ivy, and the Ivy brand is way too strong globally. It's located in the wealthiest and most populous region of the US (Northeast) and will always attract wealthy students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disagree with PP about the impact on Asians, generally in our community they still aim for the same schools regardless of year-to-year shifts. Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, Penn, Duke, Columbia, are the ones I see are very popular and highly desirable amongst Asians in our area.
HYPSM, yes. Duke and Wharton, too. Not Columbia. Asians have always seen it Columbia as a fake, a backup school for stidents who couldn't get into actual elite schools. They are even more skeptical now that Columbia has been caught faking all its numbers.
Columbia is more desirable than Duke