Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It took me a while to finish this movie. It was very slow at times and somewhat boring. I can’t for the life of me figure out what Mollie saw in Ernest to begin with.
Look at the photo above. These women were ugly as hell.
Anonymous wrote:Just saw the trailer today when DH and I went to see "Dumb Money" (it was good). But this "Killers of the Flower Moon" movie is all miscast. Leonardo DiCaprio never could actually act, but once upon a time his youth and his looks made up for his lack of actual talent. I cringed at him hard in this trailer. I like Robert De Niro, and the story itself seems interesting.
Am I the only one who found it weird to see Leo DiCaprio kiss an actual adult woman?
Anonymous wrote:It took me a while to finish this movie. It was very slow at times and somewhat boring. I can’t for the life of me figure out what Mollie saw in Ernest to begin with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the white men were sooooo evil why did the Indian women keep marrying them over and over year after year?
Internalized racism. But also plenty of people marry people they don’t realize are evil.
I believe if they were married to white people they didn’t have to have a guardianship controlled by a government official. Many Natives were declared incompetent intentionally to give them a tax advantage on their wealth derived from the oil/land value. If they weren’t the US imposed massive taxes on their money so many Natives willingly signed guardianship documents. This means every time they wanted to spend money they needed to ask a guardian and there was a long bureaucratic process. If they were married to a white person they could act as their guardian giving them more freedom as they were married.
In the movie, Mollie still has to ask her guardian for money to go to Washington DC even though she is married to Ernest. So that theory is not valid.
Anonymous wrote:I would’ve gladly watched a movie about Mollie and her sisters hanging out and talking sht instead of De Niro playing a gangster for the 1000th time.
Anonymous wrote:I think Leo is a good actor, but all his latest roles were him keeping his mouth down in some contortion.
He looks like any beer-drinking German today.
I think he should have taken on a role in some huge action or superhero movie. It would have made him more money and he would have kept his looks longer.
And yes, this might be bigotted, but he lives off his looks. Why not sue both?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the white men were sooooo evil why did the Indian women keep marrying them over and over year after year?
Because the Indian men were worse.
What I am surprised is that not more Indian women went trans or lesbian instead, given how tolerant, peaceful and spiritual their beliefs were.
Anonymous wrote:If the white men were sooooo evil why did the Indian women keep marrying them over and over year after year?
Anonymous wrote:I've wanted to watch this movie ever since I read the book. I'm certain the movie won't hold up, but the story itself is riveting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the white men were sooooo evil why did the Indian women keep marrying them over and over year after year?
Internalized racism. But also plenty of people marry people they don’t realize are evil.
I believe if they were married to white people they didn’t have to have a guardianship controlled by a government official. Many Natives were declared incompetent intentionally to give them a tax advantage on their wealth derived from the oil/land value. If they weren’t the US imposed massive taxes on their money so many Natives willingly signed guardianship documents. This means every time they wanted to spend money they needed to ask a guardian and there was a long bureaucratic process. If they were married to a white person they could act as their guardian giving them more freedom as they were married.
Anonymous wrote:If the white men were sooooo evil why did the Indian women keep marrying them over and over year after year?