Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do we hear many stories of people successfully defending themselves from random violence/theft with a gun?
I’m pretty sure a guy in Takoma Park fended off being carjacked at gunpoint by shooting at his would be attackers just a few weeks ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you really prepared to end someone's life? That's a bold move to make.
Most likely your own.
https://www.kff.org/mental-health/issue-brief/do-states-with-easier-access-to-guns-have-more-suicide-deaths-by-firearm/
https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/06/handgun-ownership-associated-with-much-higher-suicide-risk.html
Yes, someone taking appropriate measures to ensure their safety and life will do a 180 and commit suicide.
Do you people (liberals) even take a moment to think about what you are saying?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you have a handgun, why not just open carry? If someone sees a gun on your hip maybe they will NOT mess with you.
It scares the liberals.
Anonymous wrote:What I find amusing is you anti gun people think you are in the majority. When Martin Owe-Malley (the flush tax, the rain tax, etc) passed a bunch of laws around 2010 banning most rifles that were not HBARS (stupid because HBARS are still just as good as regulars) and banned magazine that held over 10 rounds, people in MD bought out the inventory for almost every gun retailer in the state. Leading old Marty to lament that adding more guns to the amount already possessed by MD citizens was not the goal and he wished the law had a mechanism to go into effect right away not half a year after it was passed and MD citizens could arm up even further. I remember standing in line at a gun shop in Baltimore County that was 30 people deep just trying to get in and get something before they were sold out.
Anonymous wrote:I am a liberal and I'm fully in support of your right to concealed carry, as long as you're at the shooting range every week to develop and maintain your skill.
Think of this this way: by carrying a gun, you're tacitly acknowledging you may one day have to use it in public. So, best to practice frequently to make sure that if (God forbid) you have to use it, you will be able to draw, aim, and hit the bad guy in three seconds -- without accidentally hitting anyone else.
A few years ago, in another big city, I spoke to the owner of a private shooting range. His most consistent clients? Local police officers. They apparently didn't get as much on-the-job practice as they felt they needed to be confident of their ability to react quickly with their sidearm.
So, to any gun owner who's reading this thread: may I suggest you practice far more than you think you'd need to? If the cops feel the need for extra training every month, then perhaps you should be practicing every week.
If you do practice every week, then honestly, I'll probably feel safer walking at night beside you than without you. But if you don't practice... I really hope I'm nowhere near when you feel the need to draw.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you really prepared to end someone's life? That's a bold move to make.
Most likely your own.
https://www.kff.org/mental-health/issue-brief/do-states-with-easier-access-to-guns-have-more-suicide-deaths-by-firearm/
https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/06/handgun-ownership-associated-with-much-higher-suicide-risk.html
Yes, someone taking appropriate measures to ensure their safety and life will do a 180 and commit suicide.
Do you people (liberals) even take a moment to think about what you are saying?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you really prepared to end someone's life? That's a bold move to make.
Most likely your own.
https://www.kff.org/mental-health/issue-brief/do-states-with-easier-access-to-guns-have-more-suicide-deaths-by-firearm/
https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/06/handgun-ownership-associated-with-much-higher-suicide-risk.html
Anonymous wrote:Are you really prepared to end someone's life? That's a bold move to make.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:very depressing, now in addition to worrying about the armed criminals and even more about the scores of irresponsible kids in DC who get their hands on weapons thanks to the US' irresponsible gun policies, now I have to worry also about the real estate attorney or soccer mom who go around fully loaded.
Let’s fall for the fallacy that the responsible gun owner is the problem, when in reality they are part of the solution.
If you have a significant portion of the population carrying concealed the criminal element doesn’t know who is and is not armed so are deterred.
Logic the failing of the left.