Anonymous wrote:The self righteousness of parents with two or less children commenting on this thread is laughable. The subject is "Parents of three...." and yet here you are, four pages into it with these mean and usless comments. Go away!
Three is perfect and I believe there's a season for every child; give yourself grace OP - we all have a stage that is hardest for us to parent and that usually makes the bonding harder as well. I have three, all the same gender and while every relationship is different, I believe they'd all say they are the favorite or least favorite depending on the day.
Anonymous wrote:The self righteousness of parents with two or less children commenting on this thread is laughable. The subject is "Parents of three...." and yet here you are, four pages into it with these mean and usless comments. Go away!
Three is perfect and I believe there's a season for every child; give yourself grace OP - we all have a stage that is hardest for us to parent and that usually makes the bonding harder as well. I have three, all the same gender and while every relationship is different, I believe they'd all say they are the favorite or least favorite depending on the day.
Anonymous wrote:Nope, I’m closest (if I’m forced to choose) to the third.
Anonymous wrote:My bond to each is definitely different but of equal (and breathtakingly strong).
Anonymous wrote:I have 3 and feel equally bonded to each - they are all very different people and interact with me differently but not more or less "bonded".
I was the oldest of 4 and would argue my parents were closer to 3 and 4 than the first two where I was sort of like a home grown au pair from age 10 on, but I don't think that mindset is as prevalent today as it was in the '80s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No my third is a delight. Of course it helps that the middle is a Pita.
Lots of middle kids are a PITA. It totally sucks that they need things like emotional support, love, time, not to mention resources that cost money. You would have so much more to dedicate to the children you actually love if you didn't make the mistake of having that middle child. Now your stuck with a little leach draining your time, energy, and resources. I wonder why they're such a pain...
Oh, but you insist you don't treat them poorly and they don't know what you really think. Right?
This, exactly. When a parent says a child is "a PITA" what they mean is "they need things I don't want or can't give them." Well whose fault is that? They are a child.
I’ll be the first to admit my second child is very high maintenance. She’s lovely, but just needs more everything (patience, instruction, reminders, hand holding, emotional support, etc.) than her sister. There is no way she or we could handle another one younger than she is, making her the middle. As it is we are stretched thin with her and also trying not to short change our older one too much. Of course it still happens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No my third is a delight. Of course it helps that the middle is a Pita.
Lots of middle kids are a PITA. It totally sucks that they need things like emotional support, love, time, not to mention resources that cost money. You would have so much more to dedicate to the children you actually love if you didn't make the mistake of having that middle child. Now your stuck with a little leach draining your time, energy, and resources. I wonder why they're such a pain...
Oh, but you insist you don't treat them poorly and they don't know what you really think. Right?
This, exactly. When a parent says a child is "a PITA" what they mean is "they need things I don't want or can't give them." Well whose fault is that? They are a child.
Anonymous wrote:It's the middle child you lose the bond with, if you had it to begin with. The baby is often the favorite, or the one you are most connected to. The middle loses their role.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No my third is a delight. Of course it helps that the middle is a Pita.
Lots of middle kids are a PITA. It totally sucks that they need things like emotional support, love, time, not to mention resources that cost money. You would have so much more to dedicate to the children you actually love if you didn't make the mistake of having that middle child. Now your stuck with a little leach draining your time, energy, and resources. I wonder why they're such a pain...
Oh, but you insist you don't treat them poorly and they don't know what you really think. Right?
Anonymous wrote:No my third is a delight. Of course it helps that the middle is a Pita.
Anonymous wrote:Being the middle literally stopped me from creating one. My kids are 6 years apart, so same distance between oldest and youngest in my family of origin but without the middle.
Only way I would have had 3 is of the youngest were twins. That didn't happen. My oldest is responsible and independent. I do find I spoil the little one a bit more and she also is the jokester in the family. I do fancy dinner dates with the older so she also gets plenty of my attention and time. Never would I have a 3rd!!! Not enough time to do right by everyone.