Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:clearly the demand for top 50 colleges is there. why not admit more in fields like STEM?
colleges would get oos tuition $$ and kids an opportunity that they might have just missed?
Because we are not China.
Why not?
China is not something everyplace aspires to be, OP, including the U.S. If you don't know this, I do not know what to tell you. China is a third world country (or whatever the PC expression might be today), and there is growing disparity in classes, such that there will soon be only two classes in the U.S., very soon.
There is also no caste system in the U.S. (unlike many Middle Eastern countries), and we prefer that.
If you like China so much, and they are so great at what they do (hint: they are not) why stay in the U.S.?
There is definitely a caste system. The Dalit Indians here would disagree with you.
Plus black / white is a caste system. Read CASTE, the book.
mAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“I'm a Harvard grad. Traditionally the freshmen are housed in Harvard Yard. There are only so many rooms. “
My apologies. I forgot that Harvard is the only college on earth, & that there is a Massachusetts law that requires college students to live on campus. But hey, congrats on that Harvard Extension degree.
As explained by some other PP, off campus housing is limited, as a practical matter, in expensive, dense urban areas, before even getting to the NIMBY issues.
Anonymous wrote:“You'd also need more professors, more TAs, etc “
I get it! I get it! There is a critical shortage of scholars. Everybody knows that. That’s why every freshly minted PhD strolls right into a tenure-track position. And why you never run into a PhD who’s having trouble finding full-time work. Sorry!
Anonymous wrote:“I'm a Harvard grad. Traditionally the freshmen are housed in Harvard Yard. There are only so many rooms. “
My apologies. I forgot that Harvard is the only college on earth, & that there is a Massachusetts law that requires college students to live on campus. But hey, congrats on that Harvard Extension degree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, what part of "there are only so many slots for the top students" - do you not understand? Are you not a top applicant, and therefore, begrudging those who are?
The question is why there are so few slots. There are more students now than there were 20, 40, 80 years ago, at the same academic caliber.
As explained in numerous posts above, physical facilities have limits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, what part of "there are only so many slots for the top students" - do you not understand? Are you not a top applicant, and therefore, begrudging those who are?
The question is why there are so few slots. There are more students now than there were 20, 40, 80 years ago, at the same academic caliber.
Anonymous wrote:clearly the demand for top 50 colleges is there. why not admit more in fields like STEM?
colleges would get oos tuition $$ and kids an opportunity that they might have just missed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, what part of "there are only so many slots for the top students" - do you not understand? Are you not a top applicant, and therefore, begrudging those who are?
The question is why there are so few slots. There are more students now than there were 20, 40, 80 years ago, at the same academic caliber.
Anonymous wrote:OP, what part of "there are only so many slots for the top students" - do you not understand? Are you not a top applicant, and therefore, begrudging those who are?