Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Goodness woman, you are 32, not 23. Any guy with di*k should be "good enough".
Besides having one this guy has a stable job making more money than the vast majority of Americans. Yet somehow it isn’t good enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I turned 32 this year and made a resolution to find someone to settle down with. Last month I hit it off with someone who seemed great. The problem is he’s civil service, GS-14.
Everyone I’ve dated in the past has been much higher income (private industry). I’m worried long term I’m going to be resentful if he can’t contribute to our lifestyle.
Should I cut him loose?
Cut him loose. I pray I run into him - I’m a 13 and enjoying the hell out of my life and meager salary. I’m working 25 hours a wk and most recently remote in Buenos Aires. So much more to life - cut him loose indeed.
Remote in Buenos Aires for a fed is probably illegal and is ripping us (the taxpayer) off regardless.
NP. No it’s not illegal and perfectly appropriate under new remote work policy. Learn before you post.
Maybe it depends on your job (maybe) but its 100% not legal in every job I'm aware of also "working 25 hours per week" and getting paid for 40 is called fraud. so...
Anonymous wrote:I turned 32 this year and made a resolution to find someone to settle down with. Last month I hit it off with someone who seemed great. The problem is he’s civil service, GS-14.
Everyone I’ve dated in the past has been much higher income (private industry). I’m worried long term I’m going to be resentful if he can’t contribute to our lifestyle.
Should I cut him loose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I turned 32 this year and made a resolution to find someone to settle down with. Last month I hit it off with someone who seemed great. The problem is he’s civil service, GS-14.
Everyone I’ve dated in the past has been much higher income (private industry). I’m worried long term I’m going to be resentful if he can’t contribute to our lifestyle.
Should I cut him loose?
Cut him loose. I pray I run into him - I’m a 13 and enjoying the hell out of my life and meager salary. I’m working 25 hours a wk and most recently remote in Buenos Aires. So much more to life - cut him loose indeed.
Remote in Buenos Aires for a fed is probably illegal and is ripping us (the taxpayer) off regardless.
NP. No it’s not illegal and perfectly appropriate under new remote work policy. Learn before you post.
Anonymous wrote:Goodness woman, you are 32, not 23. Any guy with di*k should be "good enough".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Insufficient information— how old is *he* and GS14 *what*.
If he’s a 30 y/o GS14 it’s very different than a 40 y/o GS14. Bear in mind the GS14-15 jump is a trap— going into the 15 without your 5-7 year plan for leaving government in place means accepting wage stagnation.
If you don’t know this much about government salaries by 32, living in the DC area, it may be better for you to just continue to date industry.
OP here. He’s 36, and has no interest in ever moving to private practice. It just strikes me as a red flag - not wanting to live up to his full potential.
FWIW I’m in big law and have dated in that realm, or higher income men.
Please let him go OP. There are plenty of women who would appreciate him and you are just going to put him down. Anonymous wrote:You should cut him loose so he can dodge a bullet
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I turned 32 this year and made a resolution to find someone to settle down with. Last month I hit it off with someone who seemed great. The problem is he’s civil service, GS-14.
Everyone I’ve dated in the past has been much higher income (private industry). I’m worried long term I’m going to be resentful if he can’t contribute to our lifestyle.
Should I cut him loose?
Cut him loose. I pray I run into him - I’m a 13 and enjoying the hell out of my life and meager salary. I’m working 25 hours a wk and most recently remote in Buenos Aires. So much more to life - cut him loose indeed.
Federal employees can’t work remotely outside of US unless you are stationed there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone who views a career in high-level government lawyering as “not living up to potential” has priorities that will not make this match work. Go after your own values; you treasure big money earners.
+1 My DS considers himself a public servant and is very passionate about his job. He is definitely living up to his potential, but just has different values than OP. Thankfully, he and I are on the same page.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I turned 32 this year and made a resolution to find someone to settle down with. Last month I hit it off with someone who seemed great. The problem is he’s civil service, GS-14.
Everyone I’ve dated in the past has been much higher income (private industry). I’m worried long term I’m going to be resentful if he can’t contribute to our lifestyle.
Should I cut him loose?
Cut him loose. I pray I run into him - I’m a 13 and enjoying the hell out of my life and meager salary. I’m working 25 hours a wk and most recently remote in Buenos Aires. So much more to life - cut him loose indeed.
Remote in Buenos Aires for a fed is probably illegal and is ripping us (the taxpayer) off regardless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Insufficient information— how old is *he* and GS14 *what*.
If he’s a 30 y/o GS14 it’s very different than a 40 y/o GS14. Bear in mind the GS14-15 jump is a trap— going into the 15 without your 5-7 year plan for leaving government in place means accepting wage stagnation.
If you don’t know this much about government salaries by 32, living in the DC area, it may be better for you to just continue to date industry.
OP here. He’s 36, and has no interest in ever moving to private practice. It just strikes me as a red flag - not wanting to live up to his full potential.
FWIW I’m in big law and have dated in that realm, or higher income men.