Anonymous wrote:
Have any of you realized that paying for someone else isn't necessarily going to have the desired effect?
The cashier just uses your money and pays themselves. The family in question still has to pay for their meal, and has no clue you attempted to pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are these people obsessed with an imaginary tattoo epidemic?
Unless you live in Utah (?), *young* parents are often full of tattoos, dressed like slobs, and overweight. And around DC, the clean cut parents are almost always old.
Anonymous wrote:Who are these people obsessed with an imaginary tattoo epidemic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get this quite often and we aren't model material. We are both thin, no tattoos, and don't wear sweats in public (I am usually wearing a cheap dress and husband jeans and t shirt.) When I look at the other families at Little League I can imagine their unbelievably sloppy appearances would be jarring to an older person.
These days being average or thin weight with no tattoos is a clear minority. Except perhaps for Asians.
Anonymous wrote:And they are always white families, I assume?
Anonymous wrote:We get this quite often and we aren't model material. We are both thin, no tattoos, and don't wear sweats in public (I am usually wearing a cheap dress and husband jeans and t shirt.) When I look at the other families at Little League I can imagine their unbelievably sloppy appearances would be jarring to an older person.
Anonymous wrote:
Have any of you realized that paying for someone else isn't necessarily going to have the desired effect?
The cashier just uses your money and pays themselves. The family in question still has to pay for their meal, and has no clue you attempted to pay.
Anonymous wrote:
Have any of you realized that paying for someone else isn't necessarily going to have the desired effect?
The cashier just uses your money and pays themselves. The family in question still has to pay for their meal, and has no clue you attempted to pay.
Anonymous wrote:
Have any of you realized that paying for someone else isn't necessarily going to have the desired effect?
The cashier just uses your money and pays themselves. The family in question still has to pay for their meal, and has no clue you attempted to pay.
Anonymous wrote:
Paying for a stranger, unless it's clear they're in need, is not appropriate.
I would not appreciate such a gesture, and would rather donate my time and money to people in need, not random strangers who can afford their restaurant meal.
Also, to answer another poster, it's NOT okay to stick to complimenting people who look like you. If you do that, please stop. It's internalized discrimination, and it's racist when the majority race does this for their fellows, since it exacerbates that group's cultural and socio-economic dominance. I'm not saying that the actions of one individual will have a measurable impact on the world. But it's the mindset behind it that's problematic, as well as the behaviors you're modeling for your children and all the observers around you.
So OP's husband is out of line, and OP's job is to explain this to him.
Anonymous wrote:Anytime my husband sees a mother (and father) with two or more really cute young kids he compliments how cute the kids are or what an attractive family they are in passing. He thinks this is a great compliment and makes their day. I think it’s a bit weird. I agree with him that the families he goes out of his way to compliment are classically attractive but I think they obviously know that, so it goes without saying. And two, it is a bit strange and forward for a random older male to do this. Or maybe I’m wrong and it is some great compliment to randomly hear. Once in a while the compliment comes with him paying their meal tab or if they’re behind or in front us at say a shop, he will pick up their cheque.