Anonymous wrote:The only requirement should be one uniform jersey shirt. If they play another team with the same color, they can wear numbered pinnies
Anonymous wrote:The best is when your child immediately cuts the feet out of the brand new kit socks. So now you have grip socks, tiny shin guards cuz of Jack Grealish, shin guard sleeves or tape, the sad remains of the $15 socks you just bought. Like WTF is going on down there really? Its an over complicated mess below the knees.
Anonymous wrote:LMAO at the absolute HORROR of a travel practice looking like a lowly peasant-y rec practice due to (gasp) a lack of matching practice jerseys.
If you are paying 3k a year for travel and your practice looks like a rec team practice, you have bigger problems than cutesy matching outfits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we are venting about uniforms, white shorts for adolescent girls playing game at fields with just port a potties and no way to wash their hands after dealing with tampons etc is completely idiotic. Why do clubs insist on white shorts when black is so much more practical.
When a group of moms approached our club last year they acted like they didn’t even realize it was a problem. (Men). They listened though, and got rid of the white shorts.
It's not just men. DD played for a club run by a woman that had a white on white uniform
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we are venting about uniforms, white shorts for adolescent girls playing game at fields with just port a potties and no way to wash their hands after dealing with tampons etc is completely idiotic. Why do clubs insist on white shorts when black is so much more practical.
When a group of moms approached our club last year they acted like they didn’t even realize it was a problem. (Men). They listened though, and got rid of the white shorts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If we are venting about uniforms, white shorts for adolescent girls playing game at fields with just port a potties and no way to wash their hands after dealing with tampons etc is completely idiotic. Why do clubs insist on white shorts when black is so much more practical.
When a group of moms approached our club last year they acted like they didn’t even realize it was a problem. (Men). They listened though, and got rid of the white shorts.
Anonymous wrote:If we are venting about uniforms, white shorts for adolescent girls playing game at fields with just port a potties and no way to wash their hands after dealing with tampons etc is completely idiotic. Why do clubs insist on white shorts when black is so much more practical.
Anonymous wrote:If we are venting about uniforms, white shorts for adolescent girls playing game at fields with just port a potties and no way to wash their hands after dealing with tampons etc is completely idiotic. Why do clubs insist on white shorts when black is so much more practical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sponsors go right to club pockets and don't reduce the cost for families at all.
It absolutely reduces family costs. Do you think family payments are enough to cover all the club's expenses and that they would be breaking even if not for the sponsors? Without the sponsorships you would be paying even more.
Also, when other businesses do extra things to make more profits, we don't say they are taking advantage of their customers. If a restaurant sells hats and t-shirts to make additional revenue streams do you say they are sticking it to their food customers? I don't get why clubs are the bad guys when they are just another business trying to make a profit that we are free to choose to buy their product or not. They aren't tricking us or hiding costs.
I think they all make PROFIT without the sponsorships. Sponsors are just gravy. Our club has a million teams per age group and its expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sponsors go right to club pockets and don't reduce the cost for families at all.
It absolutely reduces family costs. Do you think family payments are enough to cover all the club's expenses and that they would be breaking even if not for the sponsors? Without the sponsorships you would be paying even more.
Also, when other businesses do extra things to make more profits, we don't say they are taking advantage of their customers. If a restaurant sells hats and t-shirts to make additional revenue streams do you say they are sticking it to their food customers? I don't get why clubs are the bad guys when they are just another business trying to make a profit that we are free to choose to buy their product or not. They aren't tricking us or hiding costs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the slides are horrible looking. They also said if you didn’t buy them, you would still be charged $50….
Wow…what was the rationale for this? Were kids alrdy wearing slides and they thought they should match bc it’s unslightly?
The director’s wife likely designed and takes a cut. When something is out of the norm (mandatory slides) someone is on the take. Isn’t that illegal - charging for something even if you don’t receive a good or service - under UCC?