Anonymous wrote:With the affluence of family in the DMV area, I'm surprised there isn't a good developmental program like A5 in the Atlanta area and TAV/Madfrog in TX. Those clubs are powerhouses, because they have year round programs for youth starting at 10U. They have players developed basic volleyball fundamental skills at a young age that progress into competitive U16-18 teams.
All of the DMV teams here have players going from one club to another and their basic volleyball skills are all over the place.
We moved into the DMV from one of the areas that had clubs like A5 and Madfrog, with programs starting as young a U5, rec leagues at U7 and club at U9 and were surprised the DMV region didn't have a similar setup.
In terms of player development in the DMV very few offer U10 club teams. U11 is growing quickly though. Last year MVSA, MDJrs, MOCO, ECP, and MEVC--I'm sure there were more--all had at least one U11 team, a huge increase over prior years. If you look at the big club fall programs you get a pretty good idea of where the development is happening -- some of those programs have hundreds of players all the way down to U9. The problem is that there aren't enough coaches and/or facilities to replicate those fall programs throughout the year.
Not to start a big debate (please don't restart the "best clubs" arguments), but what is different in the DMV from where we moved from is that the most of the that compete at open levels and for USAV bids in the DMV haven't historically put much effort into developing players early (U11 or below). Our experience was that club directors do know which clubs in the area are best at developing solid fundamentals and skills in players. The "top" clubs tend to try to recruit players away from those clubs, even before they move players up from within their own club structure. None of them ran U10/U11 teams. They also only run 1 team, so there are no club development options for players that will be great, but aren't there yet. Clubs like Madfrog, Austin Skyline, etc. have a completely different approach -- fielding lots of teams at U12+ age groups and teams all the way down to U9 so players really do have the option to develop within one club. Lots of clubs that we talk about all the time on this board love to post about their recruiting success, but what they never tell you is where those players started their club journey. If you developed at Club A for 4-5 years and then jumped to Club B for 1 year to get recruited, where did the development happen?
Even in areas where A5, TAV, and Madfrog type clubs exist there is a lot of movement between the top teams at those clubs so the DMV isn't unique in this, but it is much more extreme here than where we moved from. Take a look at the MaxPreps, AVCA and PrepDig top player lists for the DMV last year. In U15 & U16 and you'll see that they are essentially spread across the top clubs in the area. U17 & U18 they tend to compress down into a smaller number of clubs because there are fewer players playing in those age groups, but they are still spread out. I'd love to see a list of where those players started their club journey.