Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Most summer swim families are middle class. If you think the middle class is elitist, OK.
Middle class do not belong to private pools.
It’s 2023 not 1960. It’s not elitist to join a community pool. It’s more elitist to have your own pool.
Yes, but real middle class cannot afford $700-1K or living in an HOA community. Be real. They go swim at the county pools.
Are you from the DMV area?
Median household income is around $130,000 for Fairfax county which has most of the pools in the NVSL. They can afford $600-700 membership fee.
Yes and $130k is not exactly middle class.
So most people are not middle classes here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Most summer swim families are middle class. If you think the middle class is elitist, OK.
Middle class do not belong to private pools.
It’s 2023 not 1960. It’s not elitist to join a community pool. It’s more elitist to have your own pool.
Yes, but real middle class cannot afford $700-1K or living in an HOA community. Be real. They go swim at the county pools.
Are you from the DMV area?
Median household income is around $130,000 for Fairfax county which has most of the pools in the NVSL. They can afford $600-700 membership fee.
Yes and $130k is not exactly middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Our summer swim is $125. So elite.
Plus the pool membership itself, the suits, the gear, etc.
They may be at a public pool. You can get cheap suits. Our team does not care what kind.
my kid wears a $15 speedo from Costco and a team swim hat that was $10. The pool for the summer was less than 2 weeks of camp.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Our summer swim is $125. So elite.
Plus the pool membership itself, the suits, the gear, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Our summer swim is $125. So elite.
Plus the pool membership itself, the suits, the gear, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Our summer swim is $125. So elite.
Plus the pool membership itself, the suits, the gear, etc.
They may be at a public pool. You can get cheap suits. Our team does not care what kind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Our summer swim is $125. So elite.
Plus the pool membership itself, the suits, the gear, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.
Our summer swim is $125. So elite.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I volunteer to be a timer when I can get a babysitter (probably every third meet) but when I don’t I have a 4 year old that cannot be unsupervised near a pool. When my other kid is older, I will volunteer more. I assume that many of the U8 families also have other little kids. Their time will come when their kids are older.
Nope. This is my first year without an 8U swimmer and 6th year with swim team. We have always volunteered and then some. Don’t participate in the activity of you cannot commit to the volunteer requirements. Your child care issues are not everyone else’s problem.
That's not really fair and the teams should have babysitters as volunteers. Our pool the parents all look after each other's kids but even if you are volunteering and have a younger swimmer its an issue as someone has to watch that child at the pool while they are waiting to swim. We left a team where some parents were nasty to the families who did volunteer complaining that our kids were not being properly supervised at meets (we'd put them all in one spot together and parents would rotate but its hard to volunteer and supervise your kid at the meets). Thankfully the new pool is different and everyone looks after each other's kids so its a non-issue. You are pretty nasty to complain about people not volunteering when they have legit issues like child care. It IS everyone's problem and being part of a team is helping each other out. If one person is volunteering and you are not, step up and watch their kid.
Anonymous wrote:I volunteer to be a timer when I can get a babysitter (probably every third meet) but when I don’t I have a 4 year old that cannot be unsupervised near a pool. When my other kid is older, I will volunteer more. I assume that many of the U8 families also have other little kids. Their time will come when their kids are older.
Anonymous wrote:Mind your own business OP
Anonymous wrote:Swimming comes across as so elitist. The expensive pay-to-play model is bad enough but then you have forced volunteering or an expensive payout? I can't see how my mom would have been able to handle that. I'm now married to a successful college swimmer and it is funny that she is the one who isn't interested in being involved in the toxic competitive swim culture.