Anonymous wrote:Also it is the SAHM who watch his movies. I just do not think I can watch him anymore. He should settle with an appropriate amount of money for a long term marriage FYI if they were just married five years and no kids the. yes the prenup makes sense but that prenup and the philosophy around it has long since expired. He is ruthless and maybe this is why she is divorcing him.

Anonymous wrote:She wants to extort him for an annual $3,000,000 salary (“child support”) to sit on her butt until the kids turn 19? She’s probably never cleared $30,000 in any job she’s ever had.

The million bucks cash and a reasonable sum for child support is plenty. He takes care of all expenses.

She’s just showing her true devious color here. She signed the pre-nup when she was a grown a** 30 years old. She eagerly signed it, too, because no other high status guys as rich as this were banging her door down.

Anonymous wrote:$400m and she gets a $1m property settlement (.25%) is spite. It’s a terrible offer to a woman you’ve been with for 25 years and had 3 children with. Much of his estate was built over the course of their married life. A reasonable, non evil person would’ve quietly given her a minimum of $10m (still less than 5%) and avoided all the negative publicity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The kids will be the ones to suffer when they see the income disparity with their parents, and how little their mom will have compared to their dad. This wasn’t some short term marriage, this was a long-term family that is breaking up. Not saying she should get 50%, but there are a lot of reasons he should be more generous. Just imagine the difference for the kids, who are able to read about these details in the press. Kevin has the ability to choose to hold her to this very lopsided prenup and be legally in the right but a spiteful jerk in the eyes of his kids. Or….. he can offer to give her more than what he is legally obligated to give her and come off as the bigger person who cared more about not screwing over the mother of his kids for the sake of spite.

And with this level of income disparity it IS spite. $1 million is NOTHING when it comes to real estate there. She would most likely have to move the kids to different school districts to find an affordable home….. and who is that punishing? All of them. It isn’t like Kevin will stop acting and be the full time parent in their normal neighborhood.

No idea what is really fair here, but if I were him I’d at least offer to buy her a house , even if he keeps it in his name and just let’s her and the kids live there until the youngest is 18. That would be a decent thing to do with very little cost to himself.

No the kids will not suffer visiting mom in a $2M + home … they will all be off to college in 1-4 years.

Mom is a designer. She is getting an insane amount of money and she can easily add to that by working.

Anonymous wrote:The kids will be the ones to suffer when they see the income disparity with their parents, and how little their mom will have compared to their dad. This wasn’t some short term marriage, this was a long-term family that is breaking up. Not saying she should get 50%, but there are a lot of reasons he should be more generous. Just imagine the difference for the kids, who are able to read about these details in the press. Kevin has the ability to choose to hold her to this very lopsided prenup and be legally in the right but a spiteful jerk in the eyes of his kids. Or….. he can offer to give her more than what he is legally obligated to give her and come off as the bigger person who cared more about not screwing over the mother of his kids for the sake of spite.

And with this level of income disparity it IS spite. $1 million is NOTHING when it comes to real estate there. She would most likely have to move the kids to different school districts to find an affordable home….. and who is that punishing? All of them. It isn’t like Kevin will stop acting and be the full time parent in their normal neighborhood.

No idea what is really fair here, but if I were him I’d at least offer to buy her a house , even if he keeps it in his name and just let’s her and the kids live there until the youngest is 18. That would be a decent thing to do with very little cost to himself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
+1000

Some bitter, bitter women posting on here. Comparing a surrogate to a woman that’s been a SAHM? Give me a break. I can’t even imagine the kind of mother a woman is that thinks those two roles are even comparable.

SAHM? Haha! How many nannies, house cleaners, and various help and servants were on staff? This is a layabout gold digger who popped out 3 kids. Big whoop.

What a misogynistic thing to say. You're still parenting even if you have lots of domestic help. No need to be so bitter and jealous.

Anonymous wrote:The prenup seems quite unusual in terms of duration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
+1000

Some bitter, bitter women posting on here. Comparing a surrogate to a woman that’s been a SAHM? Give me a break. I can’t even imagine the kind of mother a woman is that thinks those two roles are even comparable.

SAHM? Haha! How many nannies, house cleaners, and various help and servants were on staff? This is a layabout gold digger who popped out 3 kids. Big whoop.

Anonymous wrote:The kids will be the ones to suffer when they see the income disparity with their parents, and how little their mom will have compared to their dad. This wasn’t some short term marriage, this was a long-term family that is breaking up. Not saying she should get 50%, but there are a lot of reasons he should be more generous. Just imagine the difference for the kids, who are able to read about these details in the press. Kevin has the ability to choose to hold her to this very lopsided prenup and be legally in the right but a spiteful jerk in the eyes of his kids. Or….. he can offer to give her more than what he is legally obligated to give her and come off as the bigger person who cared more about not screwing over the mother of his kids for the sake of spite.

And with this level of income disparity it IS spite. $1 million is NOTHING when it comes to real estate there. She would most likely have to move the kids to different school districts to find an affordable home….. and who is that punishing? All of them. It isn’t like Kevin will stop acting and be the full time parent in their normal neighborhood.

No idea what is really fair here, but if I were him I’d at least offer to buy her a house , even if he keeps it in his name and just let’s her and the kids live there until the youngest is 18. That would be a decent thing to do with very little cost to himself.

Anonymous wrote:The kids will be the ones to suffer when they see the income disparity with their parents, and how little their mom will have compared to their dad. This wasn’t some short term marriage, this was a long-term family that is breaking up. Not saying she should get 50%, but there are a lot of reasons he should be more generous. Just imagine the difference for the kids, who are able to read about these details in the press. Kevin has the ability to choose to hold her to this very lopsided prenup and be legally in the right but a spiteful jerk in the eyes of his kids. Or….. he can offer to give her more than what he is legally obligated to give her and come off as the bigger person who cared more about not screwing over the mother of his kids for the sake of spite.

And with this level of income disparity it IS spite. $1 million is NOTHING when it comes to real estate there. She would most likely have to move the kids to different school districts to find an affordable home….. and who is that punishing? All of them. It isn’t like Kevin will stop acting and be the full time parent in their normal neighborhood.

No idea what is really fair here, but if I were him I’d at least offer to buy her a house , even if he keeps it in his name and just let’s her and the kids live there until the youngest is 18. That would be a decent thing to do with very little cost to himself.