Dana Nessel on the rocks: Case against Trump electors continues to unravel

'A politically motivated witch hunt that has no basis in the evidence'

By The Midwesterner Staff, June 5, 2024

“Wishful thinking,” “politically motivated,” “no evidence,” “witch hunt.”

Attorneys representing 15 Republican electors who backed former President Donald Trump in 2020 offered those descriptors and others on Tuesday as Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s criminal case against them continued to fall apart.

Moar: https://www.themidwesterner.news/2024/06/dana-nessel-on-the-rocks-case-against-trump-electors-continues-to-unravel/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Fox News reporting on any of this/s Do republicans ever read the full legal documents? Your party are criminals, felons, fraudulent liars, cheaters, grifters, sexual predators, through and through. Your single fake news source is owned by Dominion. Do not underestimate how all of it will go down. Every single one of them.

Doesn't matter. They reelected this idiot. As a nation, we have sank to new levels.

Anonymous wrote:

Fox News reporting on any of this/s Do republicans ever read the full legal documents? Your party are criminals, felons, fraudulent liars, cheaters, grifters, sexual predators, through and through. Your single fake news source is owned by Dominion. Do not underestimate how all of it will go down. Every single one of them.

These guys can’t even stop lying when they’re cooperating.

They’re gonna need a much bigger paddy wagon! Jack Smith is coming— be afraid.

Anonymous wrote:

Interesting that the Wisconsin electors came to a civil settlement but the AG indicted all the outsiders.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hasn’t the statue limitations expired talk about slow rolling. Why even bother at this point? So luck Garland is on the job!

You give away the fact that you are a complete moron too early.

This is in Dane County. COUNTY. That is not Gaarland territory.

Anonymous wrote:

Hasn’t the statue limitations expired talk about slow rolling. Why even bother at this point? So luck Garland is on the job!

Anonymous wrote: