Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/olo/resources/files/2010-7_truancy.pdf
Truancy and chronic absenteeism report for mcps from 2010. Interestingly, there wasn’t much of a problem. Data highlights it was primarily an issue for black and latino boys.
National data says 1 in 4 black and Latino boys are chronically absent.
Thank you for digging this up! It's so sad how often MCPS becomes aware of a problem, even reports and looks into the problem, and then allows it to fester and become worse and then act like it's a new situation that they now need to spend months and resources studying again to understand.
Kennedy had an 8.7% chronically absent rate in 2008 and now it's over 50% in 2023! How did they let it get this bad????
?
Um…the massive influx in latino newcomers—mostly boys? The school is more than 70% latino today, but that wasn’t the case 10 years ago. The surrounding area has more than its fair share of garden apartments and SFHs that are rented or owned by latinos.
It’s not a school problem.
It’s a subcultural reality: newcomers and 1st Gen latinos from certain countries aren’t here for the education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/olo/resources/files/2010-7_truancy.pdf
Truancy and chronic absenteeism report for mcps from 2010. Interestingly, there wasn’t much of a problem. Data highlights it was primarily an issue for black and latino boys.
National data says 1 in 4 black and Latino boys are chronically absent.
Thank you for digging this up! It's so sad how often MCPS becomes aware of a problem, even reports and looks into the problem, and then allows it to fester and become worse and then act like it's a new situation that they now need to spend months and resources studying again to understand.
Kennedy had an 8.7% chronically absent rate in 2008 and now it's over 50% in 2023! How did they let it get this bad????
Anonymous wrote:Bad Dads I know as a kid I get a taste of my Dads belt if I started not going to school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This issue is a huge part of the gaps in education weaning student groups. A student usually doesn’t learn well unless they are in school. The worst are the parents that go on vacation for a month in a home country in mid fall and late winter when plane tickets are cheap.
Especially when they claimed asylum based on fear for their life...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:(a) If a student fails to attend school without excuse on 10 or more days or parts of days within a six-month period in the same school year, a school district shall within 10 school days of the student's 10th absencerefer the student to a truancy court for truant conduct under Section 65.003(a), Family Code.
^^^
TX truancy laws
If your kid gets covid or a couple bad illnesses, you’re screwed.
Presumably absences for Covid wouldn’t be “without excuse” tho
You’d be surprised.
Are you schlepping to the doctor for a legit note?
Vs getting in trouble with truancy court? Sure.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/olo/resources/files/2010-7_truancy.pdf
Truancy and chronic absenteeism report for mcps from 2010. Interestingly, there wasn’t much of a problem. Data highlights it was primarily an issue for black and latino boys.
National data says 1 in 4 black and Latino boys are chronically absent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/detail.aspx?id=258
From the mcps website: a report on a special 2007|2008 initiative to address the special issues faced by Latino newcomers.
Seems like a lot of thought and funding was dedicated to issues that have only grown more complex given the influx in latino newcomers and 1st Gen Latinos.
In short: mcps already had issues with low-income black students/families back in the day, and now mcps has bigger issues as shifting demographics become Latino-heavy.
Icymi: there are very real subcultural norms when it comes to priorities. Education isn’t their priority…socioeconomics via manual labor is. They need cash to send “home” (meaning their country). Many boys (who are the source of the issue) arrive without their parents (google the DHS data on unaccompanied children arrivals).
But sure, mcps can take a hardline approach. The affluent white parents will dutifully comply. The affluent Indian parents will reluctantly comply or file a lawsuit (infringing upon their religious freedom to travel to their home country). But the chronically absent black and Latino boys and their families won’t shift behavior.
Has anyone at mcps pulled their own report from 2007?
Why the dog at affluent Indian families? Why would they reluctantly comply? They are all about education and Mike be on the other side of the spectrum where they don’t have any absent days at all.
Again, I ask, what’s the plan to get students in seats? You can’t force them, there’s a push back against disciplining them, either by fines, or getting police or CPS involved, then what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/detail.aspx?id=258
From the mcps website: a report on a special 2007|2008 initiative to address the special issues faced by Latino newcomers.
Seems like a lot of thought and funding was dedicated to issues that have only grown more complex given the influx in latino newcomers and 1st Gen Latinos.
In short: mcps already had issues with low-income black students/families back in the day, and now mcps has bigger issues as shifting demographics become Latino-heavy.
Icymi: there are very real subcultural norms when it comes to priorities. Education isn’t their priority…socioeconomics via manual labor is. They need cash to send “home” (meaning their country). Many boys (who are the source of the issue) arrive without their parents (google the DHS data on unaccompanied children arrivals).
But sure, mcps can take a hardline approach. The affluent white parents will dutifully comply. The affluent Indian parents will reluctantly comply or file a lawsuit (infringing upon their religious freedom to travel to their home country). But the chronically absent black and Latino boys and their families won’t shift behavior.
Has anyone at mcps pulled their own report from 2007?
Why the dog at affluent Indian families? Why would they reluctantly comply? They are all about education and Mike be on the other side of the spectrum where they don’t have any absent days at all.
Again, I ask, what’s the plan to get students in seats? You can’t force them, there’s a push back against disciplining them, either by fines, or getting police or CPS involved, then what?
Anonymous wrote:https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/sharedaccountability/reports/detail.aspx?id=258
From the mcps website: a report on a special 2007|2008 initiative to address the special issues faced by Latino newcomers.
Seems like a lot of thought and funding was dedicated to issues that have only grown more complex given the influx in latino newcomers and 1st Gen Latinos.
In short: mcps already had issues with low-income black students/families back in the day, and now mcps has bigger issues as shifting demographics become Latino-heavy.
Icymi: there are very real subcultural norms when it comes to priorities. Education isn’t their priority…socioeconomics via manual labor is. They need cash to send “home” (meaning their country). Many boys (who are the source of the issue) arrive without their parents (google the DHS data on unaccompanied children arrivals).
But sure, mcps can take a hardline approach. The affluent white parents will dutifully comply. The affluent Indian parents will reluctantly comply or file a lawsuit (infringing upon their religious freedom to travel to their home country). But the chronically absent black and Latino boys and their families won’t shift behavior.
Has anyone at mcps pulled their own report from 2007?