Anonymous wrote:So many people complain that there are too many dogs in shelters and people shouldn't buy purebreds when there are perfectly good dogs who may be euthanized.
But then it costs $400 and a home visit to make sure you have a fence to be allowed to adopt.
Wouldn't those shelters be less filled if it's actually easier to adopt?
I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Totally agree about the need for a rescue fee, but some have gotten pretty outrageous. I paid more than $400 to Lucky Dog, which according to their 990 (https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/or...212659349300106/full) has $6.6 million carryover in the bank. That includes $400k that they added last year, when they took in $2.4 million and spent $2.0 million. They don't need a $6 million+ cushion. Time to reduce fees and spend down to a more reasonable $2 million carryover.
Oops, mistated the numbers but the point stands.
Last year in the 990, Lucky Dog raised $3.9 million. Spent $1.9 million. Added $2 million to the bank where they have $6.7 million total in assets.
That's big business!!! Lot's of money in rescues. Most only have a few employees and tons of volunteers. It's mostly all profit.
So even though the IRS, which looks at organizations' financials, deems an organization a nonprofit, you know better?
I do, since I volunteered at a local rescue here for a year!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a lot of money in animal rescue. You can look up the financial records of a lot of non-profits that are in the NOVA area and see how much money....
It is a business don't forget.
Are you saying the people who run rescues are making a nice living from it? (I just need to know how divorced from reality you are)
Just gonna leave this right here: https://www.lostdogrescue.org/about/finance/
This shows that the amount they "made" on adoptions was about the same as the amount they spent on direct animal care (a little more in '22, less in '21) not counting other expenses like insurance.
That is, they did not make a profit on adoption fees.
Is there something in the financial statement that you find objectionable? Just the fact they have assets (from donations) they are not using to make dogs free to adopt?
They pay their head $88K. I run a non-profit and don't get paid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Totally agree about the need for a rescue fee, but some have gotten pretty outrageous. I paid more than $400 to Lucky Dog, which according to their 990 (https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/or...212659349300106/full) has $6.6 million carryover in the bank. That includes $400k that they added last year, when they took in $2.4 million and spent $2.0 million. They don't need a $6 million+ cushion. Time to reduce fees and spend down to a more reasonable $2 million carryover.
Oops, mistated the numbers but the point stands.
Last year in the 990, Lucky Dog raised $3.9 million. Spent $1.9 million. Added $2 million to the bank where they have $6.7 million total in assets.
That's big business!!! Lot's of money in rescues. Most only have a few employees and tons of volunteers. It's mostly all profit.
So even though the IRS, which looks at organizations' financials, deems an organization a nonprofit, you know better?
Anonymous wrote:Rescues are a total scam. A bunch of bored people who want you to fund their hobby of fostering dogs.
I went to the south, walked into a shelter, paid a $50 fee, walked out with a dog — the fee covered the neuter too.
In DC, they wanted me to pay $500 for the privilege of an unannounced home visit and someone to judge my lifestyle and tell me my house isn’t good enough for a rescue dog. Then they didn’t even have as many dogs as cute as the pup I got from the shelter.
Do a road trip down south.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are reselling the dogs.
X10000
It’s no longer pet stores, it’s rescues that are selling dogs. These are reselling. It’s just another way to buy a dog.
Anonymous wrote:They are reselling the dogs.
Anonymous wrote:Rescues are a total scam. A bunch of bored people who want you to fund their hobby of fostering dogs.
I went to the south, walked into a shelter, paid a $50 fee, walked out with a dog — the fee covered the neuter too.
In DC, they wanted me to pay $500 for the privilege of an unannounced home visit and someone to judge my lifestyle and tell me my house isn’t good enough for a rescue dog. Then they didn’t even have as many dogs as cute as the pup I got from the shelter.
Do a road trip down south.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a lot of money in animal rescue. You can look up the financial records of a lot of non-profits that are in the NOVA area and see how much money....
It is a business don't forget.
Are you saying the people who run rescues are making a nice living from it? (I just need to know how divorced from reality you are)
Just gonna leave this right here: https://www.lostdogrescue.org/about/finance/
This shows that the amount they "made" on adoptions was about the same as the amount they spent on direct animal care (a little more in '22, less in '21) not counting other expenses like insurance.
That is, they did not make a profit on adoption fees.
Is there something in the financial statement that you find objectionable? Just the fact they have assets (from donations) they are not using to make dogs free to adopt?
They pay their head $88K. I run a non-profit and don't get paid.
Anonymous wrote:because they have figured out how to make it a money making business.
let's get dogs and have people feel that they are doing something good, they will throw all sorts of money at us and we can make some good money.
Anonymous wrote:The vet industry is out of control??? That is nuts. Vets have a lot of college debt and don’t make anywhere close to doctor money. Most of them do work for shelter, rescue groups, or strays brought in by random people for free or very low cost.