Anonymous wrote:No, no lawyer. Everything turned out fine, although traumatic, for your child. Carry a can of Raid or Bear spray on walks….that will stop the dog. You were justified in kicking the dog, so I wouldn’t give that a second thought. You should probably keep your 22 month old closer so you can scoop her up. You never know what can happen.
Anonymous wrote:This all happened yesterday so still processing.
I was walking with my toddler (22 months) and infant. Infant strapped to chest as toddler is about a foot in front of me. A very small terrier mix ran from porch and started attacking DD. Bit her on the legs and would not let go. Dog owner (woman in her 60s) yelled at dog to stop, in a panic I kicked the dog hard. The dog let go and ran back to the porch and neighbor screamed at me for kicking dog. I swooped crying toddler up and headed home.
DH took her to urgent care and they asked for address of dog owner so they can attempt to get vaccination record. Police went and thankfully dog is up to date on vaccines but is being quarantined. DD got antibiotic shot but is ok.
Today an officer came by to question us about the incident. The neighbors are claiming we came on to property and assaulted the dog.
DH is fuming and wants to get a lawyer and sue for damages (medical bills, which overall aren’t that bad).
I am not a confrontational person. These people live 8 houses down. We are fairly new to area and I don’t want this to become a bigger issue.
I do think they should offer to pay for DD medical expenses. I’m confused as to why they say we went onto their property and I kicked dog. All this took place on sidewalk and I kicked the dog to get it off my child?
Should we get a lawyer? Especially if our neighbors are going to accuse me of something I did not do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lawyer for $300 in medical bills? OP you are nuts. Let it go. It’ll cost you more in legal bills. Not to mention the strain it’ll put on this “relationship “ with your new neighbors.
Who wants a relationship with liars who let their dogs bite little kids?
Anonymous wrote:Since they’re being nasty and trying to turn the tables on you I’d get a lawyer. If they had been apologetic this wouldn’t have been an issue. You also want to make sure this doesn’t occur again.
I’d check if anyone has Ring cameras.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you’re a troll but I’ll play too. Your kid was on the neighbor’s property. You weren’t paying attention because you were on your phone. Your kid did something to antagonize the dog. Your kid was never in danger but you still kicked the dog. You should be charged with assaulting the dog. But don’t worry, Michael Vick redeemed himself so maybe you can too.
You should be winning prizes for fiction writing.![]()
Do you realize how stupid you sound?
The real fiction writer is the OP. Just go back and read it again. The writing is just very dramatic and tailored to the DCUM troll biters. And OP makes the story just gray enough to create a discussion. Credit to the OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you’re a troll but I’ll play too. Your kid was on the neighbor’s property. You weren’t paying attention because you were on your phone. Your kid did something to antagonize the dog. Your kid was never in danger but you still kicked the dog. You should be charged with assaulting the dog. But don’t worry, Michael Vick redeemed himself so maybe you can too.
You should be winning prizes for fiction writing.![]()
Do you realize how stupid you sound?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely floored lawyers are advising not to hire a lawyer and others are claiming the OP is crazy. The neighbor is clearly posturing to take action by accusing the OP of “hitting first”. A lawyer is to prepare for a counter suit, possibly a cease and desist depending on what the neighbor does next… not strike first. Isn’t that obviously the right move here?
These “lawyers” are simply trolling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely floored lawyers are advising not to hire a lawyer and others are claiming the OP is crazy. The neighbor is clearly posturing to take action by accusing the OP of “hitting first”. A lawyer is to prepare for a counter suit, possibly a cease and desist depending on what the neighbor does next… not strike first. Isn’t that obviously the right move here?
Literally 2 posts above yours have 2 lawyers saying they’d get a lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:I think you’re a troll but I’ll play too. Your kid was on the neighbor’s property. You weren’t paying attention because you were on your phone. Your kid did something to antagonize the dog. Your kid was never in danger but you still kicked the dog. You should be charged with assaulting the dog. But don’t worry, Michael Vick redeemed himself so maybe you can too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lawyer for $300 in medical bills? OP you are nuts. Let it go. It’ll cost you more in legal bills. Not to mention the strain it’ll put on this “relationship “ with your new neighbors.
It could become more of a strain if the lying dog owner is allowed to continue to lie.
We are only getting one side of the story. OP said it happened fast. The child might’ve could’ve been on the property which legally mucks things up.
I’d let it go. She wasn’t mauled or even needed stitches.
I had a friend whose child was mauled by a pit bull - but the child actually entered the house without permission (she was looking for her friend to see if she wanted to play) and legally her mom could do nothing, which was sad.
Anonymous wrote:I think you’re a troll but I’ll play too. Your kid was on the neighbor’s property. You weren’t paying attention because you were on your phone. Your kid did something to antagonize the dog. Your kid was never in danger but you still kicked the dog. You should be charged with assaulting the dog. But don’t worry, Michael Vick redeemed himself so maybe you can too.