Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DC Dems look terrible opposing ranked choice. I think they are just worried about losing control of council which has way too many encumbents and is going too far to the left. I have lived here for 25 years and I don't know anyone who wants extreme prgoressives. Ranked choice might actually get us some common sense, centrist candidates.
If there was a clear strong candidate that was a common sense centrist wouldn't they be able to just win? Why does ranked choice help all that much?
I'm highly annoyed it was paired with open primaries which I won't support. And when I signed a petition to support RCV going on the ballot, there was no mention of the other part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The DC Dems look terrible opposing ranked choice. I think they are just worried about losing control of council which has way too many encumbents and is going too far to the left. I have lived here for 25 years and I don't know anyone who wants extreme prgoressives. Ranked choice might actually get us some common sense, centrist candidates.
If there was a clear strong candidate that was a common sense centrist wouldn't they be able to just win? Why does ranked choice help all that much?
I'm highly annoyed it was paired with open primaries which I won't support. And when I signed a petition to support RCV going on the ballot, there was no mention of the other part.
Anonymous wrote:The DC Dems look terrible opposing ranked choice. I think they are just worried about losing control of council which has way too many encumbents and is going too far to the left. I have lived here for 25 years and I don't know anyone who wants extreme prgoressives. Ranked choice might actually get us some common sense, centrist candidates.
Anonymous wrote:I'd rather have run-off elections. That gives voters the clearest choices and enable an election of the person preferred by most voters, not the spoiler candidate who came in highest at 2nd place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure this is actually being pushed by Republicans so they can have a chance to take over by confusing the lower information voters.
What Republicans? There's like five of them in DC. Here's a list of cities that use ranked choice voting:
San Francisco
New York City
Portland, Oregon
Seattle
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Berkeley, California
Minneapolis
Portland, Maine
Takoma, Maryland
Arlington, Virginia
Burlington, Vermont
You'll notice that it's highly liberal areas that tend to adopt ranked choice voting...
Let's say you have three candidates: 2 white and one black. The two white candidates form an agreement to ask their supporters to vote the other white person as their second choice. Who loses in this situation?
Not enough info. Race alone is not a valid reason to vote for or against anyone.
You are using racist logic. How ironic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've heard it said that ranked choice voting is how NYC finally got a moderate mayor, no? Sounds promising to me!
NYC got Eric Adams through ranked choice voting. Be careful what you wish for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure this is actually being pushed by Republicans so they can have a chance to take over by confusing the lower information voters.
What Republicans? There's like five of them in DC. Here's a list of cities that use ranked choice voting:
San Francisco
New York City
Portland, Oregon
Seattle
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Berkeley, California
Minneapolis
Portland, Maine
Takoma, Maryland
Arlington, Virginia
Burlington, Vermont
You'll notice that it's highly liberal areas that tend to adopt ranked choice voting...
Let's say you have two candidates: 2 white and one black. The two white candidates form an agreement to ask their supporters to vote the other white person as their second choice. Who loses in this situation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure this is actually being pushed by Republicans so they can have a chance to take over by confusing the lower information voters.
What Republicans? There's like five of them in DC. Here's a list of cities that use ranked choice voting:
San Francisco
New York City
Portland, Oregon
Seattle
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Berkeley, California
Minneapolis
Portland, Maine
Takoma, Maryland
Arlington, Virginia
Burlington, Vermont
You'll notice that it's highly liberal areas that tend to adopt ranked choice voting...
Let's say you have two candidates: 2 white and one black. The two white candidates form an agreement to ask their supporters to vote the other white person as their second choice. Who loses in this situation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've heard it said that ranked choice voting is how NYC finally got a moderate mayor, no? Sounds promising to me!
NYC got Eric Adams through ranked choice voting. Be careful what you wish for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure this is actually being pushed by Republicans so they can have a chance to take over by confusing the lower information voters.
What Republicans? There's like five of them in DC. Here's a list of cities that use ranked choice voting:
San Francisco
New York City
Portland, Oregon
Seattle
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Berkeley, California
Minneapolis
Portland, Maine
Takoma, Maryland
Arlington, Virginia
Burlington, Vermont
You'll notice that it's highly liberal areas that tend to adopt ranked choice voting...
Let's say you have two candidates: 2 white and one black. The two white candidates form an agreement to ask their supporters to vote the other white person as their second choice. Who loses in this situation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure this is actually being pushed by Republicans so they can have a chance to take over by confusing the lower information voters.
What Republicans? There's like five of them in DC. Here's a list of cities that use ranked choice voting:
San Francisco
New York City
Portland, Oregon
Seattle
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Berkeley, California
Minneapolis
Portland, Maine
Takoma, Maryland
Arlington, Virginia
Burlington, Vermont
You'll notice that it's highly liberal areas that tend to adopt ranked choice voting...
Let's say you have two candidates: 2 white and one black. The two white candidates form an agreement to ask their supporters to vote the other white person as their second choice. Who loses in this situation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pretty sure this is actually being pushed by Republicans so they can have a chance to take over by confusing the lower information voters.
What Republicans? There's like five of them in DC. Here's a list of cities that use ranked choice voting:
San Francisco
New York City
Portland, Oregon
Seattle
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Berkeley, California
Minneapolis
Portland, Maine
Takoma, Maryland
Arlington, Virginia
Burlington, Vermont
You'll notice that it's highly liberal areas that tend to adopt ranked choice voting...
Anonymous wrote:I've heard it said that ranked choice voting is how NYC finally got a moderate mayor, no? Sounds promising to me!