Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting
See: WI, NC, GA, FL, TX, VA, MI
If we could eliminate gerrymandering, they'd all be blue.
Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
if the schools are great and GOP politicians decide to cut education funding for said schools, that impacts the quality of teaching and other resources for said school, not?
If the schools are great, but a co-ed can be thrown in jail for having a miscarriage, that seems problematic, no?
It’s been pointed out more than once that the schools at issue are all very well-funded and many in-state students attend for free. At this stage of the economy, legislators of any state could propose a bill to reduce spending for higher education. So when you go to any public school, you take that chance.
And if your kid has a miscarriage, it’s a miscarriage. Nobody is going to jail for a miscarriage. But, if that’s all that matters to you, then you won’t send your kid to one of these annointed “good” schools and you’ll be happy paying full-boat at a private in a blue state that will allow for your kid to get as many abortions as she wants.
The chances of blue state legislators reducing funding for higher education, particularly economic engines like state flagships is minimal.
As to the bolded, you are not paying attention to red state legislation, particularly in states like Missouri, Ohio, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and Tennessee.
You just assume that college girls just fool around and get pregnant (without marriage), correct? Even those who do fool around, there are condoms and contraception.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
if the schools are great and GOP politicians decide to cut education funding for said schools, that impacts the quality of teaching and other resources for said school, not?
If the schools are great, but a co-ed can be thrown in jail for having a miscarriage, that seems problematic, no?
It’s been pointed out more than once that the schools at issue are all very well-funded and many in-state students attend for free. At this stage of the economy, legislators of any state could propose a bill to reduce spending for higher education. So when you go to any public school, you take that chance.
And if your kid has a miscarriage, it’s a miscarriage. Nobody is going to jail for a miscarriage. But, if that’s all that matters to you, then you won’t send your kid to one of these annointed “good” schools and you’ll be happy paying full-boat at a private in a blue state that will allow for your kid to get as many abortions as she wants.
The chances of blue state legislators reducing funding for higher education, particularly economic engines like state flagships is minimal.
As to the bolded, you are not paying attention to red state legislation, particularly in states like Missouri, Ohio, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida and Tennessee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
if the schools are great and GOP politicians decide to cut education funding for said schools, that impacts the quality of teaching and other resources for said school, not?
If the schools are great, but a co-ed can be thrown in jail for having a miscarriage, that seems problematic, no?
It’s been pointed out more than once that the schools at issue are all very well-funded and many in-state students attend for free. At this stage of the economy, legislators of any state could propose a bill to reduce spending for higher education. So when you go to any public school, you take that chance.
And if your kid has a miscarriage, it’s a miscarriage. Nobody is going to jail for a miscarriage. But, if that’s all that matters to you, then you won’t send your kid to one of these annointed “good” schools and you’ll be happy paying full-boat at a private in a blue state that will allow for your kid to get as many abortions as she wants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
if the schools are great and GOP politicians decide to cut education funding for said schools, that impacts the quality of teaching and other resources for said school, not?
If the schools are great, but a co-ed can be thrown in jail for having a miscarriage, that seems problematic, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
if the schools are great and GOP politicians decide to cut education funding for said schools, that impacts the quality of teaching and other resources for said school, not?
If the schools are great, but a co-ed can be thrown in jail for having a miscarriage, that seems problematic, no?
It’s been pointed out more than once that the schools at issue are all very well-funded and many in-state students attend for free. At this stage of the economy, legislators of any state could propose a bill to reduce spending for higher education. So when you go to any public school, you take that chance.
And if your kid has a miscarriage, it’s a miscarriage. Nobody is going to jail for a miscarriage. But, if that’s all that matters to you, then you won’t send your kid to one of these annointed “good” schools and you’ll be happy paying full-boat at a private in a blue state that will allow for your kid to get as many abortions as she wants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
if the schools are great and GOP politicians decide to cut education funding for said schools, that impacts the quality of teaching and other resources for said school, not?
If the schools are great, but a co-ed can be thrown in jail for having a miscarriage, that seems problematic, no?
It’s been pointed out more than once that the schools at issue are all very well-funded and many in-state students attend for free. At this stage of the economy, legislators of any state could propose a bill to reduce spending for higher education. So when you go to any public school, you take that chance.
And if your kid has a miscarriage, it’s a miscarriage. Nobody is going to jail for a miscarriage. But, if that’s all that matters to you, then you won’t send your kid to one of these annointed “good” schools and you’ll be happy paying full-boat at a private in a blue state that will allow for your kid to get as many abortions as she wants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with that? Other than MIT (private), Georgetown (private), and Purdue (public in a red state), many Southern schools are going back to requiring SAT/ACT. Lead by Florida. They are emphasizing meritocracy rather than DEI BS. On the other hand, UC has made standardized test irrelevant (not just test optional). It will take a while, as sea change doesn’t happen overnight, but in the future schools in red states will dominate over blue states in STEM. Science doesn’t care about the color of your skin, whether you are straight or LGBTQ, or whether your parents are rich or poor.
Lol. Conservatives don’t care about STEM or science.
Yes they do. They care about real science. They don’t care about junk science like global warming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
if the schools are great and GOP politicians decide to cut education funding for said schools, that impacts the quality of teaching and other resources for said school, not?
If the schools are great, but a co-ed can be thrown in jail for having a miscarriage, that seems problematic, no?
Anonymous wrote:If the schools are good, then who cares about the politics of the state? Honestly, too many are too loud about politics. Go to the school that is the best fit for you and love your life!
All of this political hand-wringing is ruining our nation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with that? Other than MIT (private), Georgetown (private), and Purdue (public in a red state), many Southern schools are going back to requiring SAT/ACT. Lead by Florida. They are emphasizing meritocracy rather than DEI BS. On the other hand, UC has made standardized test irrelevant (not just test optional). It will take a while, as sea change doesn’t happen overnight, but in the future schools in red states will dominate over blue states in STEM. Science doesn’t care about the color of your skin, whether you are straight or LGBTQ, or whether your parents are rich or poor.
Lol. Conservatives don’t care about STEM or science.
Yes they do. They care about real science. They don’t care about junk science like global warming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with that? Other than MIT (private), Georgetown (private), and Purdue (public in a red state), many Southern schools are going back to requiring SAT/ACT. Lead by Florida. They are emphasizing meritocracy rather than DEI BS. On the other hand, UC has made standardized test irrelevant (not just test optional). It will take a while, as sea change doesn’t happen overnight, but in the future schools in red states will dominate over blue states in STEM. Science doesn’t care about the color of your skin, whether you are straight or LGBTQ, or whether your parents are rich or poor.
Lol. Conservatives don’t care about STEM or science.
Yes they do. They care about real science. They don’t care about junk science like global warming.