Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to pursue a lucrative career in finance or tech, then paying up for prestige often makes sense. If not, then financially, it is hard to justify. Anyone pinching their own financial security (for example borrowing money you really don’t have) should think twice or three times about paying more than they have to for anything but elite degrees. Screwing up your retirement for Colby doesn’t make sense. That said, if you do have money, think of it as a luxury good, not just an investment. Like a vacation to Paris instead of Florida. In the scheme of luxury goods, I think a wonderful college experience is more valuable than a fancy car, for example. There are intangible benefits to the experience which could translate into financial benefits. For example, your English major daughter is more likely to find a future investment banker to marry at some schools versus others (for better or worse). But people who cannot afford luxury goods shouldn’t buy them.
I felt like so many of the posters in this thread live in such a bubble and are just so narrow minded about the reasons parents might choose to invest more than others to send their kids to college. I like this post, though. Makes perfect sense.
You are free to invest all you want, but don't complain when you want to retire and don't have enough saved. It should never come at the cost of retirement savings. "people who cannot afford luxury goods shouldn't buy them" is best way to put it
Anonymous wrote:OP: At elite National Private Universities and at elite LACs, the annual total cost-of-attendance exceeds $80,000--and this figure rises slightly each year. A true full pay family at an elite private college or university should budget about $350,000 per student over the course of the next 4 years.
Anonymous wrote:Financial aid, driven largely by endowment, is amazing at these wealthy private schools. It means most low-income kids won't have to work a lot on campus, which is awesome. However, when deciding about paying close to full price, endowment related concerns are pretty far down the list (almost like fringe benefits).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is a CS major. MIT would've been the only school we'd consider huge loans for, or impacting our retirement savings.
DC didn't get into MIT, so instead, they are going to UMD with honors and some merit.
But now DC has funds for a masters, if they so choose, or we can rollover to their retirement account. Not a bad way to start out of college for parents who came from very humble beginnings.
Only MIT just doesn't make any sense, especially for CS. Great that DC has $$ for an MS but
It does for us. MIT has a global reputation. Schools like CMU, U of Michigan and GA Tech, while really great, don't have the same global reputation. Stanford, IMO, isn't *that* worth it, IMO. COL out in CA is insane. And I used to live around there.
It depends on what you mean by global. CMU is very well known in China and India for example. It probably isn't going to wow anyone in Australia or South Africa though.
Remember that MIT isn't Harvard, Stanford, or Yale in terms of global name recognition and reputation. It is great but not up there with Oxbridge either.
Global means just that, not just India or China.
Harvard may be known globally but, IMO, Harvard doesn't have a strong CS program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is a CS major. MIT would've been the only school we'd consider huge loans for, or impacting our retirement savings.
DC didn't get into MIT, so instead, they are going to UMD with honors and some merit.
But now DC has funds for a masters, if they so choose, or we can rollover to their retirement account. Not a bad way to start out of college for parents who came from very humble beginnings.
Only MIT just doesn't make any sense, especially for CS. Great that DC has $$ for an MS but
It does for us. MIT has a global reputation. Schools like CMU, U of Michigan and GA Tech, while really great, don't have the same global reputation. Stanford, IMO, isn't *that* worth it, IMO. COL out in CA is insane. And I used to live around there.
It depends on what you mean by global. CMU is very well known in China and India for example. It probably isn't going to wow anyone in Australia or South Africa though.
Remember that MIT isn't Harvard, Stanford, or Yale in terms of global name recognition and reputation. It is great but not up there with Oxbridge either.
Anonymous wrote:Only Northeastern, UVA, and Tufts worth the money. Every other school, including all Ivies, are not worth it.
I see what you did there.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to pursue a lucrative career in finance or tech, then paying up for prestige often makes sense. If not, then financially, it is hard to justify. Anyone pinching their own financial security (for example borrowing money you really don’t have) should think twice or three times about paying more than they have to for anything but elite degrees. Screwing up your retirement for Colby doesn’t make sense. That said, if you do have money, think of it as a luxury good, not just an investment. Like a vacation to Paris instead of Florida. In the scheme of luxury goods, I think a wonderful college experience is more valuable than a fancy car, for example. There are intangible benefits to the experience which could translate into financial benefits. For example, your English major daughter is more likely to find a future investment banker to marry at some schools versus others (for better or worse). But people who cannot afford luxury goods shouldn’t buy them.
I felt like so many of the posters in this thread live in such a bubble and are just so narrow minded about the reasons parents might choose to invest more than others to send their kids to college. I like this post, though. Makes perfect sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know OP - I have 2 kids and I have a lot of 529 money saved, but in general, I think you are thinking about it the wrong way. I'm likely to spend more money for my DS class of 2023 than for my DS class of 2020. DS 2020, at a highly ranked school, is a strong motivated student. He did well in admissions but definitely had some rejections, picked a good school that gave him merit money so his overall cost is below the sticker price by a lot. But he is a motivated person - he will be fine at this school or at MIT or at a third tier state school - he will make the most of his opportunities. I'm glad he picked the school that gave him money because for a kid that will succeed no matter what, why over spend?
DS 23 is not as strong of a student - he needs a smaller environment and will likely attend a smaller private school, which may cost more. He is unlikely to get the same type of merit money (most decisions are in already but none of his admissions have come with the same offer as my older one). But it's worth it because he will need the help.
I can't imagine telling him he can't attend a good private school because he didn't try hard enough or it's not worth it since he can't get into MIT.
This is how we are looking at it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:T25 + Tufts
Tufts has really shitty outcome
Worth one of the least.
- Boston College: Average Annual Cost $37k, Median Earnings $93k
- Northeastern: Average Annual Cost $30k, Median Earnings $80k
- Boston University: Average Annual Cost $30k, Median Earnings $76k
- Brandeis: Average Annual Cost $34k, Median Earnings $70k
- Tufts: Average Annual Cost $37k, Median Earnings $67k
I’m a Tufts grad have made 10x that number. Of the four mentioned tufts is the only one that does not have an undergrad business degree. So the folks who go to tufts probably have different motivations and goals as an overall student body ie they aren’t in it for the money. But if you want to make bank you can and the degree is no slouch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to pursue a lucrative career in finance or tech, then paying up for prestige often makes sense. If not, then financially, it is hard to justify. Anyone pinching their own financial security (for example borrowing money you really don’t have) should think twice or three times about paying more than they have to for anything but elite degrees. Screwing up your retirement for Colby doesn’t make sense. That said, if you do have money, think of it as a luxury good, not just an investment. Like a vacation to Paris instead of Florida. In the scheme of luxury goods, I think a wonderful college experience is more valuable than a fancy car, for example. There are intangible benefits to the experience which could translate into financial benefits. For example, your English major daughter is more likely to find a future investment banker to marry at some schools versus others (for better or worse). But people who cannot afford luxury goods shouldn’t buy them.
I felt like so many of the posters in this thread live in such a bubble and are just so narrow minded about the reasons parents might choose to invest more than others to send their kids to college. I like this post, though. Makes perfect sense.
Anonymous wrote:I think increasingly schools full pay at schools like Brandeis, BU, Pepperdine, Syracuse, etc. are not worth it for $200k income households. Just too expensive for the return.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:T25 + Tufts
Tufts has really shitty outcome
Worth one of the least.
- Boston College: Average Annual Cost $37k, Median Earnings $93k
- Northeastern: Average Annual Cost $30k, Median Earnings $80k
- Boston University: Average Annual Cost $30k, Median Earnings $76k
- Brandeis: Average Annual Cost $34k, Median Earnings $70k
- Tufts: Average Annual Cost $37k, Median Earnings $67k
Anonymous wrote:If your kid is going to pursue a lucrative career in finance or tech, then paying up for prestige often makes sense. If not, then financially, it is hard to justify. Anyone pinching their own financial security (for example borrowing money you really don’t have) should think twice or three times about paying more than they have to for anything but elite degrees. Screwing up your retirement for Colby doesn’t make sense. That said, if you do have money, think of it as a luxury good, not just an investment. Like a vacation to Paris instead of Florida. In the scheme of luxury goods, I think a wonderful college experience is more valuable than a fancy car, for example. There are intangible benefits to the experience which could translate into financial benefits. For example, your English major daughter is more likely to find a future investment banker to marry at some schools versus others (for better or worse). But people who cannot afford luxury goods shouldn’t buy them.