Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There was a thread last week about male babysitters. I can’t find it and don’t know where moved or zapped.

I have two boys about to become teenagers. They have shown an interest in babysitting to earn some money. I hope there truly isn’t a bias against boys. That’s what I and my spouse had growing up! Had the best times too!

Out of all the options out there, it’s highly unusual that pre-teen boys want to babysit more than anything else. What other interests do they have?

Of course there’s a bias against male babysitters for obvious reasons. You already know that. Just check out all the teachers who recently assaulted children. What percentage were female?? And there we are. Parents aren’t that stupid. Sorry.

Anonymous wrote:There was a thread last week about male babysitters. I can’t find it and don’t know where moved or zapped.

I have two boys about to become teenagers. They have shown an interest in babysitting to earn some money. I hope there truly isn’t a bias against boys. That’s what I and my spouse had growing up! Had the best times too!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a bias because boys are much much much more likely to abuse kids. Not that your boys would but seriously why would someone take the chance?

Girls are much much more likely to be mean bullies and abuse kids. I only hire teen babysitters whose families we personally know.

This is your opinion, not fact. The second part makes sense. Why would you hire someone to take care of your children you didn't know?

It’s a fact that a users are far more likely to be male (though of course most men and boys are not abusers!) in my opinion the risk isn’t worth it.

+1

It's the same reason you probably wouldn't open your door for a young black male but wouldn't hesitate for a little old lady.

No need for your racism here.

Not racist. This thread is stating that statistically men are more likely to abuse than women. In the same vein, young black men are more likely to commit a crime than a little old lady.

Young men are more likely to commit crimes. And if you’re white you are much more likely to be murdered or assaulted by a white person than you are a black person. Most crime is intraracial. So if you’re white (which I assume you are) you should be more cautious of young white men than young black men.

This is BS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been a nanny for 25 years and think mannies are amazing - especially for boys!! I really don’t want to play soccer for 2 hours a day, but typically mannies love that! On the flip side, maybe male nannies don’t want to do pretend play with calico critters or do crafts for hours on end, but that’s perfect for me. I work in Beverly Hills, and it’s super common for families to have male caregivers for their pre and teen boys.

Why would a teen need a babysitter at all? I would say that is extremely uncommon

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe just castrate all males? they are out of control, apparently.

I'm not sure castration is the best answer but I would support a ban on any males entering the country until we get our own out of control males under control, somehow. Maybe we could build a wall. When there is indisputable evidence that most crime of all kinds is perpetrated by a particular group it makes sense to institute a ban.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe just castrate all males? they are out of control, apparently.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a bias because boys are much much much more likely to abuse kids. Not that your boys would but seriously why would someone take the chance?

Girls are much much more likely to be mean bullies and abuse kids. I only hire teen babysitters whose families we personally know.

This is your opinion, not fact. The second part makes sense. Why would you hire someone to take care of your children you didn't know?

It’s a fact that a users are far more likely to be male (though of course most men and boys are not abusers!) in my opinion the risk isn’t worth it.

+1

It's the same reason you probably wouldn't open your door for a young black male but wouldn't hesitate for a little old lady.

No need for your racism here.

Not racist. This thread is stating that statistically men are more likely to abuse than women. In the same vein, young black men are more likely to commit a crime than a little old lady.

Young men are more likely to commit crimes. And if you’re white you are much more likely to be murdered or assaulted by a white person than you are a black person. Most crime is intraracial. So if you’re white (which I assume you are) you should be more cautious of young white men than young black men.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe just castrate all males? they are out of control, apparently.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a bias because boys are much much much more likely to abuse kids. Not that your boys would but seriously why would someone take the chance?

Girls are much much more likely to be mean bullies and abuse kids. I only hire teen babysitters whose families we personally know.

This is your opinion, not fact. The second part makes sense. Why would you hire someone to take care of your children you didn't know?

It’s a fact that a users are far more likely to be male (though of course most men and boys are not abusers!) in my opinion the risk isn’t worth it.

+1

It's the same reason you probably wouldn't open your door for a young black male but wouldn't hesitate for a little old lady.

No need for your racism here.

Not racist. This thread is stating that statistically men are more likely to abuse than women. In the same vein, young black men are more likely to commit a crime than a little old lady.

What is your statistical evidence for this assertion

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bc it’s odd that a teenage boy would genuinely want to take care of little kids.

I will never have a male babysitter.

Then you are missing out on phenomenal sitters. I have two boys and used a make babysitter primarily for them. He was athletic and sksi on the honor roll. He wasn't primping, mooning over a girlfriend, talking on phone all the time.

He was babysitting and lawn work to buy his first car.

Both my boys tried to model him and so many of his good qualities trickled down to them. He was in such demand that I paid him well over prevailing wage.

Not hiring teen age boys to babysit is as prejudiced as not hiring an AA or Hispanic teen age girl.

Eh, I'm okay with missing out on some phenomenal babysitters if it also means missing out on the majority of child sex abusers. YMMV.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bc it’s odd that a teenage boy would genuinely want to take care of little kids.

I will never have a male babysitter.

Then you are missing out on phenomenal sitters. I have two boys and used a make babysitter primarily for them. He was athletic and sksi on the honor roll. He wasn't primping, mooning over a girlfriend, talking on phone all the time.

He was babysitting and lawn work to buy his first car.

Both my boys tried to model him and so many of his good qualities trickled down to them. He was in such demand that I paid him well over prevailing wage.

Not hiring teen age boys to babysit is as prejudiced as not hiring an AA or Hispanic teen age girl.

So...did you hire a minority teen girl to babysit? No. You hired a male, and paid him more than you would have paid a girl. It sounds like you are extremely prejudiced, and sexist too.

You should listen to that dull roar in the empty space between your ears.

I paid him more because other parents were trying to poach him from me. If he wasn't available I used other sitters irrespective of gender and/or race.

No, he wasn't in demand. He told you he was so you would pay him more. He played you.