Anonymous wrote:I went to Whitman, but on this board and in real life, I have seen/heard of a lot of B-CC bashing. People saying it’s not as good as Whitman/Churchill/Wootton/Walter Johnson, Whitman parents scoffing at the idea of their kids being redistricted to B-CC, people on DCUM saying that B-CC is mediocre for its demographics, etc.
I just don’t get it. To me, B-CC seems like a great schools. It’s high-performing, it’s diverse (I know a lot of you will argue otherwise, but the demographics of the school are reflective of the country as a whole, and it is by far more diverse than the surrounding schools).
Anonymous wrote:PP here - I hope to hear from actual Westland and BCC parents who can share their honest feedback of these schools. Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to Whitman, but on this board and in real life, I have seen/heard of a lot of B-CC bashing. People saying it’s not as good as Whitman/Churchill/Wootton/Walter Johnson, Whitman parents scoffing at the idea of their kids being redistricted to B-CC, people on DCUM saying that B-CC is mediocre for its demographics, etc.
I just don’t get it. To me, B-CC seems like a great schools. It’s high-performing, it’s diverse (I know a lot of you will argue otherwise, but the demographics of the school are reflective of the country as a whole, and it is by far more diverse than the surrounding schools).
BCC was on par with Whitman and Churchill back in the 1960s even early 70s within something changed. The school, for some reason went downhill.
Can you take me to the farm that you derived that statement from? Because it’s a load of bs.
BCC doesn't keep the poors out like Whitman and Churchill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to Whitman, but on this board and in real life, I have seen/heard of a lot of B-CC bashing. People saying it’s not as good as Whitman/Churchill/Wootton/Walter Johnson, Whitman parents scoffing at the idea of their kids being redistricted to B-CC, people on DCUM saying that B-CC is mediocre for its demographics, etc.
I just don’t get it. To me, B-CC seems like a great schools. It’s high-performing, it’s diverse (I know a lot of you will argue otherwise, but the demographics of the school are reflective of the country as a whole, and it is by far more diverse than the surrounding schools).
BCC was on par with Whitman and Churchill back in the 1960s even early 70s within something changed. The school, for some reason went downhill.
Can you take me to the farm that you derived that statement from? Because it’s a load of bs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went to Whitman, but on this board and in real life, I have seen/heard of a lot of B-CC bashing. People saying it’s not as good as Whitman/Churchill/Wootton/Walter Johnson, Whitman parents scoffing at the idea of their kids being redistricted to B-CC, people on DCUM saying that B-CC is mediocre for its demographics, etc.
I just don’t get it. To me, B-CC seems like a great schools. It’s high-performing, it’s diverse (I know a lot of you will argue otherwise, but the demographics of the school are reflective of the country as a whole, and it is by far more diverse than the surrounding schools).
BCC was on par with Whitman and Churchill back in the 1960s even early 70s within something changed. The school, for some reason went downhill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it should be noted that I have seen from BCC many examples of kids from poor, immigrant families who have been elevated by going to school with motivated white kids. All of such kids in my DD’s elementary school class who graduated from BCC last year are now at UMD. All are first in their families to go to college. It’s really really nice to see.
I know people like these stories but don’t want it at the cost of their child’s education. That didn’t happen. My DD is at a great college and I think going to a school with such a big socio-economic mix was good for her.
So, if we are an international, educated family here, but not wealthy in DC-terms, my kid should do just fine, right? We were contemplating between Pyle/Whitman and Westland/BCC, but wanted a more economically diverse school population and hoping the IB program will be a good option.
Pick Pyle/Whitman. If you are international and educated, your child has the cultural capital and behaviors that will make that cluster work for them. BCC is not a bad school, but there is so much to deal with that you can save yourself the trouble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it should be noted that I have seen from BCC many examples of kids from poor, immigrant families who have been elevated by going to school with motivated white kids. All of such kids in my DD’s elementary school class who graduated from BCC last year are now at UMD. All are first in their families to go to college. It’s really really nice to see.
I know people like these stories but don’t want it at the cost of their child’s education. That didn’t happen. My DD is at a great college and I think going to a school with such a big socio-economic mix was good for her.
So, if we are an international, educated family here, but not wealthy in DC-terms, my kid should do just fine, right? We were contemplating between Pyle/Whitman and Westland/BCC, but wanted a more economically diverse school population and hoping the IB program will be a good option.
Pick Pyle/Whitman. If you are international and educated, your child has the cultural capital and behaviors that will make that cluster work for them. BCC is not a bad school, but there is so much to deal with that you can save yourself the trouble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it should be noted that I have seen from BCC many examples of kids from poor, immigrant families who have been elevated by going to school with motivated white kids. All of such kids in my DD’s elementary school class who graduated from BCC last year are now at UMD. All are first in their families to go to college. It’s really really nice to see.
I know people like these stories but don’t want it at the cost of their child’s education. That didn’t happen. My DD is at a great college and I think going to a school with such a big socio-economic mix was good for her.
So, if we are an international, educated family here, but not wealthy in DC-terms, my kid should do just fine, right? We were contemplating between Pyle/Whitman and Westland/BCC, but wanted a more economically diverse school population and hoping the IB program will be a good option.
Anonymous wrote:I went to Whitman, but on this board and in real life, I have seen/heard of a lot of B-CC bashing. People saying it’s not as good as Whitman/Churchill/Wootton/Walter Johnson, Whitman parents scoffing at the idea of their kids being redistricted to B-CC, people on DCUM saying that B-CC is mediocre for its demographics, etc.
I just don’t get it. To me, B-CC seems like a great schools. It’s high-performing, it’s diverse (I know a lot of you will argue otherwise, but the demographics of the school are reflective of the country as a whole, and it is by far more diverse than the surrounding schools).
Anonymous wrote:I think it should be noted that I have seen from BCC many examples of kids from poor, immigrant families who have been elevated by going to school with motivated white kids. All of such kids in my DD’s elementary school class who graduated from BCC last year are now at UMD. All are first in their families to go to college. It’s really really nice to see.
I know people like these stories but don’t want it at the cost of their child’s education. That didn’t happen. My DD is at a great college and I think going to a school with such a big socio-economic mix was good for her.