Anonymous wrote:Honestly, as a group, I think women are far more evil than men. Most men are very simple. They want food, sex, and the respect of their male peers, but as long as they have those things, most seem to have a live-and-let-live approach to others. Women are far more complex and devious, have far more nuanced needs, are more insecure on average, and are far more likely to sell out friends, family, and colleagues when it suits their goals.

I agree that the world has known some spectacularly evil men with enough power to do real damage, but if you randomly put 50 women and 50 men in a room, I bet you'd find more evil more consistently among the women. Evil in women is just expressed differently from evil in men.

Being complex and devious is not at all the same as being evil. Being evil is killing other people. Women will make each other cry, but they really almost never kill each other. Men are funny; they are live-and-let-live until something sends them into the war state. Then they kill and kill and kill and kill...

I don't think there would be wars that killed more than one person if there were only women.

Honestly, as a group, I think women are far more evil than men. Most men are very simple. They want food, sex, and the respect of their male peers, but as long as they have those things, most seem to have a live-and-let-live approach to others. Women are far more complex and devious, have far more nuanced needs, are more insecure on average, and are far more likely to sell out friends, family, and colleagues when it suits their goals.

I agree that the world has known some spectacularly evil men with enough power to do real damage, but if you randomly put 50 women and 50 men in a room, I bet you'd find more evil more consistently among the women. Evil in women is just expressed differently from evil in men.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because their sole purpose is to perpetuate the species with their own genes. So they are here to gather as many resources as possible to make procreating with as many of the healthiest specimens possible. Part of doing all this requires providing protection to their women and offspring from other men looking to do the same with their women and destroying their offspring in hopes of perpetuating their own gene pool.

That's an interesting theory and it sounds about right, except, how do the psycho-killer-rapist fit into that?

Mental illness. It could be due to an older man who probably should not have procreated was enabled by a society created by his male ancestors. The society helped him to gather more resources and continue breeding past his prime, healthy years.

Where does this theory come from? I've never heard that before.

I came across this very interesting theory a few weeks ago...


In the bible it says that Eve was tricked by the devil and ate from the tree "Of the knowledge of Good and Evil" I think it's called, then gave some of the apple to her husband Adam.

I read this passage of the bible over and over again trying to get some clues to validate or negate this theory, but if you are spiritual/religious this might explain why men are/seem more evil then women.

Because Eve ate the apple! She hate the apple "of the knowledge of Good and Evil". She gave some to her husband. He might have eaten the whole thing, he might have taken one bite then thrown the rest of away. He might have hated apples and just ate some to make her happy.

On the other hand, Eve ate all of her apple it was assumed. She might have ate more then one. Simply put, Eve has more knowledge and power over the concept of Good and Evil then Adam does. She ate more of the super fruit that grants knowledge of Good and Evil. Men perhaps are not able to discern or fight against certain evil impulses as well as women.

I believe testosterone is the double edged sword of the human race. It gives men their power and strength but if this energy is directed in the wrong way it can lead to great evils. Men, perhaps, are not as able to fight this darker nature off as well as women because simply "Eve ate the apple". Women, however, as the "help meets" of men have to help men stay on the proper course and not fall into their darker animal nature. This admittedly is very hard since the evil nature also causes men to think all women are stupid and they naturally know everything. They assume because the bible tells women we are submit to them that God is telling them that they are superior to us. I believe it's actually the opposite! Because men are weaker then women when it comes to this aspect, if men do not have a wife and children to make them feel important, loved and needed they fall into their darker natures and start to focus more on evil. The problem is the media has influenced men to not listen to their women. We can't help them because they think they don't need our help and we are just "nagging them" or trying to "change them". The media tells men they are not suppose to change, a woman should love you just as you are or be done with her. Everyone has to change at different points in their life! A man at 35 should not be the same as he was when he was 15 or even 25. Especially if that man has a wife/children/responsibilities.

But men punish their wives by "not listening to them" and by "not talking to them", instead being encouraged to listen to drunken college movies, violent video games, pornography and other forms of "entertainment" that has unfortunately rendered a lot of men useless to their families and society. t.

The more separated men are from women the more they exhibit behavior one could categorize as "sociopaths" or "psychopathic". The Nazi military trained soldiers to be killers by removing young boys from their mothers care.
Many men are violent these days not because there are no fathers in the home, but actually because there are no mothers in the home. The mothers are too busy working or searching for men to love them and replace the one that abandoned them and their children. Lack of men in the home causes laziness, worthlessness and sexual dysfunctions because men control the sphere's of "work" and "sex". No women in the home makes people more cold hearted, violent and detached from other living creatures because women control the sphere of "nurturing" and "love".

If you look at that attack in Springfield, multiple boys attack a single boy with kicks to the head, and guess who broke it up? The girls.

I read a couple of books about sociopathy. About 1 in 25 people is a sociopath. While sociopathy is not good for society, it does give advantages to the sociopath - in terms of resources.

Sociopathy is more frequently found in males.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because their sole purpose is to perpetuate the species with their own genes. So they are here to gather as many resources as possible to make procreating with as many of the healthiest specimens possible. Part of doing all this requires providing protection to their women and offspring from other men looking to do the same with their women and destroying their offspring in hopes of perpetuating their own gene pool.

That's an interesting theory and it sounds about right, except, how do the psycho-killer-rapist fit into that?

Mental illness. It could be due to an older man who probably should not have procreated was enabled by a society created by his male ancestors. The society helped him to gather more resources and continue breeding past his prime, healthy years.

First, OP, for you to have written this must mean that you have had something terrible happen to you and for that I am truly sorry. I hope you will find peace at some point.

Someone I admire said that both men and women are evil:

Men are evil by raping and killing.
Women are evil by doing everything else.

Sounds about right, except that I think there are just a few people who inflict lots of damage on many others. I personally think most men and women are not evil, just the few that are, are incredibly destructive.

Which also brings up that famous saying "All it takes for evil to triumph is for the good to do nothing."

Anonymous wrote:Because their sole purpose is to perpetuate the species with their own genes. So they are here to gather as many resources as possible to make procreating with as many of the healthiest specimens possible. Part of doing all this requires providing protection to their women and offspring from other men looking to do the same with their women and destroying their offspring in hopes of perpetuating their own gene pool.

That's an interesting theory and it sounds about right, except, how do the psycho-killer-rapist fit into that?

Because their sole purpose is to perpetuate the species with their own genes. So they are here to gather as many resources as possible to make procreating with as many of the healthiest specimens possible. Part of doing all this requires providing protection to their women and offspring from other men looking to do the same with their women and destroying their offspring in hopes of perpetuating their own gene pool.

Any woman who still calls upon "Girl" power deserves an evil man.

That article is pissing me off. Is there a reason to read the whole thing? More of the same?

-a feminist

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting article about how men will soon be obsolete:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/8135/

Still want them around to service me regularly, however!

What a disgusting article.

Why do I get the feeling that somewhere there are a group of male scientist behind this whole "the end of men" campaign. Smiling, laughing, ready to call some cheerleader or beauty queen on their "not if you were the last man on earth!" threat.

Anonymous wrote:As a woman, I would HATE to live in a place with only women. As this forum so blatantly demonstrates, get a bunch of women together and they are catty and tear each other apart.

I'm one of the dreaded 'guy's girls' on this forum. I love my sister and my mom. I have the same childhood (girl) best friend since I was 4 and some great college girlfriends, but I don't join any large groups of women, e.g., sororities, mom's groups, etc. I have always preferred to 'hang with the guys'. I found them refreshingly straightforward and honest---except for the latest group of men that are essentially turning into females.

My mom so eloquently put it "whenever a large group of women get together--they are bunch of bitches". So true.

My work group is made up of almost all women and it has the most strife in the entire agency. My 2 best bosses and most understanding to 'mom/maternity' issues were male---not the rabid, b*tches.

OK, we definitely need to get coffee. I am EXACTLY the same!

Anonymous wrote:Interesting article about how men will soon be obsolete:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/the-end-of-men/8135/

Still want them around to service me regularly, however!

What a disgusting article.