Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem with the anti-intellectual mob that crows against dead white men authors is that often the proposed alternatives rarely even qualify as literature.
Case in point, my child’s assigned reading, Esperanza Rising, by some no name author, but checks a bunch of boxes for what counts as the correct ‘lived experiences’. I’m sorry, but what a complete waste of time! Simplistic plot line, poor character development, vocabulary and sentence structure at the comic book level. And that’s the only book they read so far this year!
To the question of what constitutes classics, how shallow and simplistic is to judge and reject literature by the genitals of the author? Classics are works that have an outsized influence on the culture, on later authors, and how society perceives the world. Why can’t they read Aesop’s fables instead? Yeah, I know, dead (certainly), white (possibly), male.
My son has suffered through Esperanza Rising as well, and he said as much but in simpler terms. What a bunch of crock they have to read!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the classics question, there is more to being educated that just reading books a bunch of old dead white men wrote.
The classics are such a narrow range of human experience. They are best addresses in a history class as a way to study the values of the time periods in which they are written.
This is just not true. They are classics because their themes are eternal and still relevant in our day and age
While the books du jour they are replaced with - who knows if they will last?
Anonymous wrote:The problem with the anti-intellectual mob that crows against dead white men authors is that often the proposed alternatives rarely even qualify as literature.
Case in point, my child’s assigned reading, Esperanza Rising, by some no name author, but checks a bunch of boxes for what counts as the correct ‘lived experiences’. I’m sorry, but what a complete waste of time! Simplistic plot line, poor character development, vocabulary and sentence structure at the comic book level. And that’s the only book they read so far this year!
To the question of what constitutes classics, how shallow and simplistic is to judge and reject literature by the genitals of the author? Classics are works that have an outsized influence on the culture, on later authors, and how society perceives the world. Why can’t they read Aesop’s fables instead? Yeah, I know, dead (certainly), white (possibly), male.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your child is almost an adult and should be able to handle books of this sort. This is why you don’t shelter kids; it makes them unprepared for life.
These kids are living in a pandemic. They aren’t shielded. They don’t need extra trauma in their lives.
Anonymous wrote:The problem with the anti-intellectual mob that crows against dead white men authors is that often the proposed alternatives rarely even qualify as literature.
Case in point, my child’s assigned reading, Esperanza Rising, by some no name author, but checks a bunch of boxes for what counts as the correct ‘lived experiences’. I’m sorry, but what a complete waste of time! Simplistic plot line, poor character development, vocabulary and sentence structure at the comic book level. And that’s the only book they read so far this year!
To the question of what constitutes classics, how shallow and simplistic is to judge and reject literature by the genitals of the author? Classics are works that have an outsized influence on the culture, on later authors, and how society perceives the world. Why can’t they read Aesop’s fables instead? Yeah, I know, dead (certainly), white (possibly), male.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your child is almost an adult and should be able to handle books of this sort. This is why you don’t shelter kids; it makes them unprepared for life.
These kids are living in a pandemic. They aren’t shielded. They don’t need extra trauma in their lives.
Anonymous wrote:I am starting to think that people who try to defy classics are just not well trained in reading and not deep thinkers. They only take in the book if it’s relevant to their everyday existence. Basically lack of imagination and knowledge
Anonymous wrote:Your child is almost an adult and should be able to handle books of this sort. This is why you don’t shelter kids; it makes them unprepared for life.
Anonymous wrote:Your child is almost an adult and should be able to handle books of this sort. This is why you don’t shelter kids; it makes them unprepared for life.
Anonymous wrote:My DD is a Senior and is currently reading an assigned book that takes place in Afghanistan and is very violent. She told me she is having nightmares but is only half way through. I have read the book and the treatment and brutality towards women is horrifying but I don’t know what to advise my DD to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the classics question, there is more to being educated that just reading books a bunch of old dead white men wrote.
The problem is, they did write some pretty good books. And reading books that may not be that great, but written by non white non dead non men, doesn’t mean better education
They will grow up having never read the classics
Which in my book means not really educated
- DP
What are "the classics" though? Who decides? When and why do books stop being "classics"? When and why do they start?
My theory is that they withstand the test of time. The test of educated people with good, developed literary taste. Even if these people are- the horror!- white men
Leo Tolstoy wrote Anna Karenina which is not about the white men problems at all
It is still relevant despite how much has changed, including the fact it didn’t even happen in America
It’s written really well, withstands the test of time and place, you have your classics
Yeah it is.
I have read a lot of "classics". I tried to read Anna Karenina. You can keep it. In fact, you can keep all of Tolstoy.