The opposite...Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Textbooks are an outdated practice that are expensive, inflexible, and disliked by students. Schools across the country have stopped using them.
Is there any research that shows that kids learn better without books than with books?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Textbooks are an outdated practice that are expensive, inflexible, and disliked by students. Schools across the country have stopped using them.
Public schools across the country have stopped using them and justify this by talking about the "expense" of purchasing them. Instead they are spending that money on Chromebooks which have full internet access because everyone knows children have the self-control to focus on the math problems they are supposed to be doing on the screen instead of Youtube videos.
In the meantime Catholic schools are still using textbooks and we can all see the terrible results they are getting in educating children of all socioeconomic backgrounds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Other elementary schools have textbooks. FCPS having none seems cheap and short sighted.
As others have said on this thread, Montgomery and Howard (two other wealthy/educated counties in the area) do not. Not sure about Loudoun or Arlington.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a teacher, I would love to have textbooks to use with my students. Textbooks are costly and curriculum changes. I get that. It would be to the benefit it the students, families, and teachers to have access to them. I’d rather money go towards textbooks than the countless PD days we have in our calendar.
+100
Not to mention, some of the (very expensive) online programs are absolute crap, and many teachers agree with this. What a waste of money.
Online learning can be done well. Kahn Academy, CTY, Beast Academy, etc are very good programs.
Beast academy does have a textbook/workbook, but its not required.
https://beastacademy.com/books#curriculum
our 4th graders have to share a book in VA studies bc there are not enoughAnonymous wrote:My 4th grader reports that they have a book for the civil war but nothing else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Textbooks are an outdated practice that are expensive, inflexible, and disliked by students. Schools across the country have stopped using them.
Public schools across the country have stopped using them and justify this by talking about the "expense" of purchasing them. Instead they are spending that money on Chromebooks which have full internet access because everyone knows children have the self-control to focus on the math problems they are supposed to be doing on the screen instead of Youtube videos.
In the meantime Catholic schools are still using textbooks and we can all see the terrible results they are getting in educating children of all socioeconomic backgrounds.
Are catholic schools doing any better than FCPS? Do you have any data to back up your assertion?
Why can’t you look things up on your own? Here’s the data:
https://www.educationnext.org/catholic-schools-are-a-rare-bright-spot-in-nations-report-card-2022-data/
Why can’t you post things that aren’t propaganda? Education Next wants to siphon public education dollars to further enrich corporate America. Because everyone knows businesses are great at educating our children
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Textbooks are an outdated practice that are expensive, inflexible, and disliked by students. Schools across the country have stopped using them.
Public schools across the country have stopped using them and justify this by talking about the "expense" of purchasing them. Instead they are spending that money on Chromebooks which have full internet access because everyone knows children have the self-control to focus on the math problems they are supposed to be doing on the screen instead of Youtube videos.
In the meantime Catholic schools are still using textbooks and we can all see the terrible results they are getting in educating children of all socioeconomic backgrounds.
Are catholic schools doing any better than FCPS? Do you have any data to back up your assertion?
Why can’t you look things up on your own? Here’s the data:
https://www.educationnext.org/catholic-schools-are-a-rare-bright-spot-in-nations-report-card-2022-data/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Textbooks are an outdated practice that are expensive, inflexible, and disliked by students. Schools across the country have stopped using them.
Public schools across the country have stopped using them and justify this by talking about the "expense" of purchasing them. Instead they are spending that money on Chromebooks which have full internet access because everyone knows children have the self-control to focus on the math problems they are supposed to be doing on the screen instead of Youtube videos.
In the meantime Catholic schools are still using textbooks and we can all see the terrible results they are getting in educating children of all socioeconomic backgrounds.
Are catholic schools doing any better than FCPS? Do you have any data to back up your assertion?
Why can’t you look things up on your own? Here’s the data:
https://www.educationnext.org/catholic-schools-are-a-rare-bright-spot-in-nations-report-card-2022-data/
I don't see any mention of FCPS there
Ugh, the PO asked about Catholic schools’ data
PP asked for data that catholics are doing better than FCPS. Logically, that would require FCPS data to answer
Anonymous wrote:Other elementary schools have textbooks. FCPS having none seems cheap and short sighted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a teacher, I would love to have textbooks to use with my students. Textbooks are costly and curriculum changes. I get that. It would be to the benefit it the students, families, and teachers to have access to them. I’d rather money go towards textbooks than the countless PD days we have in our calendar.
+100
Not to mention, some of the (very expensive) online programs are absolute crap, and many teachers agree with this. What a waste of money.
Online learning can be done well. Kahn Academy, CTY, Beast Academy, etc are very good programs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Textbooks are an outdated practice that are expensive, inflexible, and disliked by students. Schools across the country have stopped using them.
Public schools across the country have stopped using them and justify this by talking about the "expense" of purchasing them. Instead they are spending that money on Chromebooks which have full internet access because everyone knows children have the self-control to focus on the math problems they are supposed to be doing on the screen instead of Youtube videos.
In the meantime Catholic schools are still using textbooks and we can all see the terrible results they are getting in educating children of all socioeconomic backgrounds.
Are catholic schools doing any better than FCPS? Do you have any data to back up your assertion?
Why can’t you look things up on your own? Here’s the data:
https://www.educationnext.org/catholic-schools-are-a-rare-bright-spot-in-nations-report-card-2022-data/
I don't see any mention of FCPS there
Ugh, the PO asked about Catholic schools’ data
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a teacher, I would love to have textbooks to use with my students. Textbooks are costly and curriculum changes. I get that. It would be to the benefit it the students, families, and teachers to have access to them. I’d rather money go towards textbooks than the countless PD days we have in our calendar.
+100
Not to mention, some of the (very expensive) online programs are absolute crap, and many teachers agree with this. What a waste of money.