Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CA poster here. My list is accurate, just may be incomplete. 1 Stanford REA legacy, Princeton athletic recruit.
I moved from the Bay Area and have heard things have been very good again this year at Castilleja (as usual).
Bullying is not warranted but listing non-DC area school results on a DC-specific board is more than a little odd (even if it is only 95% DC area). You could start another thread with CA or West Coast early results very easily. Plenty of "DCUM blame" all around!
+1000. None of us care about admittances at your CA school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m local. Kids at private. Senior this year. I’m interested in all of the results. Not sure why everyone is so crabby about others posting. Lighten up!!
The college process creates a lot of stress. Kids don't need to have it made worse by hearing that other kids got in schools and they did not. Plus, when results are made public it encourages some kids to fabricate favorable admission results. That makes other kids feel like they are the only ones who weren't accepted to schools. With mental health being such a concern, our senior child's school had an assembly at the beginning of the year and recommended that kids not share results.
Anonymous wrote:I’m local. Kids at private. Senior this year. I’m interested in all of the results. Not sure why everyone is so crabby about others posting. Lighten up!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do people know these things about hundreds of other students
Kids talk and many schools have an insta with decisions
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:f*ck me i am the only reader of this board whose children do not attend harvard-westlake
Maybe not the only, but a whole lot of Californians are here. This board is not a private conversation amongst locals.
"Regional: Over half of visits from DC, MD, and VA. California and New York are the next most common locations of users"
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/advertising/
Anonymous wrote:PP local with a Senior this year. This is my third admissions cycle. The results from each year from each of my other kids had absolutely no bearing on what happened another year. The kids are all different, the landscape changes. I think it’s interesting that people are so interested in what particular school it is. Because, in my limited, but current experience- it doesn’t matter the school. Kids have different grades, test scores, activities, hooks. Bottom line, any of this info from any poster will not help you or your kid get into the school of their dreams- these are merely data points. Thanks to everyone for posting!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Small private singe sex not in DC: 2 Princeton, Rice, 2 Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke, 2 Wesleyan, 2 Wash U, 2 Swarthmore, 2 Georgetown
Single sex private attended by opposite gender child: Harvard, Brown, Columbia, Amherst, Stanford, Hopkins, Chicago, Notre Dame, 2 Emory
Baltimore
Ok, i am nosey.
2 Princeton, Rice, 2 Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke, 2 Wesleyan, 2 Wash U, 2 Swarthmore, 2 Georgetown -- This is Bryn Mawr. Princeton x 2, Rice, Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke and Swarthmore are all athletic recruits.
Single sex private attended by opposite gender child: Harvard, Brown, Columbia, Amherst, Stanford, Hopkins, Chicago, Notre Dame, 2 Emory ---This is Gilman. Columbia, Amherst, Stanford and JHU are all athletic recruits.
Same story everywhere. The smartest kids who are non-athletes mostly go to WashU and Chicago.![]()
Wow I wouldn’t have thought these two schools were that sporty, especially BM. I had no idea their success rate with matriculations was based so much on sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Small private singe sex not in DC: 2 Princeton, Rice, 2 Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke, 2 Wesleyan, 2 Wash U, 2 Swarthmore, 2 Georgetown
Single sex private attended by opposite gender child: Harvard, Brown, Columbia, Amherst, Stanford, Hopkins, Chicago, Notre Dame, 2 Emory
Baltimore
Ok, i am nosey.
2 Princeton, Rice, 2 Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke, 2 Wesleyan, 2 Wash U, 2 Swarthmore, 2 Georgetown -- This is Bryn Mawr. Princeton x 2, Rice, Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke and Swarthmore are all athletic recruits.
Single sex private attended by opposite gender child: Harvard, Brown, Columbia, Amherst, Stanford, Hopkins, Chicago, Notre Dame, 2 Emory ---This is Gilman. Columbia, Amherst, Stanford and JHU are all athletic recruits.
Same story everywhere. The smartest kids who are non-athletes mostly go to WashU and Chicago.![]()
Wow I wouldn’t have thought these two schools were that sporty, especially BM. I had no idea their success rate with matriculations was based so much on sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Small private singe sex not in DC: 2 Princeton, Rice, 2 Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke, 2 Wesleyan, 2 Wash U, 2 Swarthmore, 2 Georgetown
Single sex private attended by opposite gender child: Harvard, Brown, Columbia, Amherst, Stanford, Hopkins, Chicago, Notre Dame, 2 Emory
Baltimore
Ok, i am nosey.
2 Princeton, Rice, 2 Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke, 2 Wesleyan, 2 Wash U, 2 Swarthmore, 2 Georgetown -- This is Bryn Mawr. Princeton x 2, Rice, Middlebury, Northwestern, Duke and Swarthmore are all athletic recruits.
Single sex private attended by opposite gender child: Harvard, Brown, Columbia, Amherst, Stanford, Hopkins, Chicago, Notre Dame, 2 Emory ---This is Gilman. Columbia, Amherst, Stanford and JHU are all athletic recruits.
Same story everywhere. The smartest kids who are non-athletes mostly go to WashU and Chicago.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W school
MIT 2
Yale 3
Harvard 1
Princeton 1
Stanford 4
I call bullshit on the 4 Stanford
Whitman had 3 acceptances from last year.
DP. All early, though?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CA poster here. My list is accurate, just may be incomplete. 1 Stanford REA legacy, Princeton athletic recruit.
I moved from the Bay Area and have heard things have been very good again this year at Castilleja (as usual).
Bullying is not warranted but listing non-DC area school results on a DC-specific board is more than a little odd (even if it is only 95% DC area). You could start another thread with CA or West Coast early results very easily. Plenty of "DCUM blame" all around!
I mean I think it’s a good data point. Are there differences between DC area admits and CA and if so why is an interesting question….
I have my kid in a Bay Area private and was unprepared for the faculty children admits to Stanford, including this set of twins my son called the “throw up twins.” They ruined so much upholstery at their friends’ parties that they started getting charged $75 to attend such parties. They were not very academic-minded but still got into Stanford because their parent was a faculty member.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W school
MIT 2
Yale 3
Harvard 1
Princeton 1
Stanford 4
I call bullshit on the 4 Stanford
Whitman had 3 acceptances from last year.