What about Perez Hilton. He seems like a peach.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Martha’s daughter

Oh, I guess that explains the famous family, on the phone with her mom thing. But I wouldn't call HER famous considering I had no idea who she was!!

The article didn't call her famous either. It just referenced a famous family.

Alexis had a radio show, a tv show, and a book.

Plus she runs in the millionaire’s/billionaire’s circle.

All thanks to her mom.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Martha’s daughter

Oh, I guess that explains the famous family, on the phone with her mom thing. But I wouldn't call HER famous considering I had no idea who she was!!

The article didn't call her famous either. It just referenced a famous family.

Alexis had a radio show, a tv show, and a book.

Plus she runs in the millionaire’s/billionaire’s circle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Martha’s daughter

Oh, I guess that explains the famous family, on the phone with her mom thing. But I wouldn't call HER famous considering I had no idea who she was!!

The article didn't call her famous either. It just referenced a famous family.

Neither Hilaria nor Priyanka.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could the nice couple be SJP and Matthew Broderick?

Their surrogate had twins.

They could be Shanna's final surrogacy:

"Four years after her experience with Catherine, Shanna's former surrogacy agency asked her if she would be willing to be introduced to another couple. After meeting them, and loving them, she agreed to go through it one final time.

This time she gave birth to twins."

Anonymous wrote:Martha’s daughter

I thought it was Rod Stewart! LOL.

However, I do think this is the floodgates opening on other celebs who lie about carrying babies, for vanities sake. (to keep their acting careers going, etc. not Bc of health reasons).

after I had my child, I almost died. to carry another baby could've been fatal. if I had the $$, I absolutely would've done surrogacy. plus keep my milk going from actual pregnancy (like a faker I know).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reddit thinks it is Alexis Stewart.

There’s an article from 2010 that says she hired a surrogate in PA, references a number of failed attempts, and she discussed it on Oprah.

Was single.

Total narcissist.

Alexis Stewart definitely wins my vote
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1393216/Martha-Stewarts-daughter-Alexis-5-year-struggle-baby.html

The surrogate would have been pregnant in 2010 then, since the article said the baby was born in March 2011. So all of these pregnancies took place quite some time ago so probably not newer stuff like Hilaria, Tyra, Paris etc. Also the fact that she lives in PA means that she’s in all likelihood a surrogate for celebs based in NYC as opposed to LA. That’s a smaller pool.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Courtney Cox used a surrogate.

Cameron Diaz.

Khloe.

Courtney Cox was super pregnant the last few episodes of Friends. They didn’t even try to hide it.

+1. Courtney Cox carried and birthed Coco. I think they barely tried to hide it on the show, because everyone was so excited for her. She gave birth after the final episode of Friends.

Anonymous wrote:Reddit thinks it is Alexis Stewart.

There’s an article from 2010 that says she hired a surrogate in PA, references a number of failed attempts, and she discussed it on Oprah.

Was single.

Total narcissist.

Alexis Stewart definitely wins my vote
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1393216/Martha-Stewarts-daughter-Alexis-5-year-struggle-baby.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The power imbalances here are terrible.

Yup. I think we are way too far down the slippery slope to stop it, but I think in general surrogacy should be against public policy. It's a gross exploitation of another person, regardless of consent. If you are hard up enough that you'll rent your body out for the better part of a year to undertake an inherently risky medical venture you are in no place to give informed consent.

I personally think it should largely be banned.

It’s not more dangerous than donating a kidney. Should that be banned?

The article said she had three previous “easy” pregnancies — as someone who enjoyed being pregnant, I could see someone choosing to do this. What happened to “my body, my choice?”

Pregnancy and birth is absolutely more dangerous than donating a kidney. And it is in fact illegal to pay for a kidney, so your analogy doesn't make sense.

That would be wrong. The death rate for kidney donors is 0.07%, not to mention the guaranteed permanent reduction in kidney function. The US maternal death rate is 0.02%.

Plus, people here are just flatly saying “surrogacy should be illegal.”

It is interesting that you didn’t answer as to why choice and bodily autonomy shouldn’t apply here. Choice is good thing if you want to terminate a fetus, but not if you want to carry one to term?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Martha’s daughter

LOL! I thought it was one of Rod Stewart’s offspring.

+1

Me too! This woman has a famous mom. She is absolutely not famous herself.

For the last pregnancy, apete Buttigieg and his husband had w twins.

Anonymous wrote:Martha’s daughter

LOL! I thought it was one of Rod Stewart’s offspring.

Anonymous wrote:Martha’s daughter

Oh, I guess that explains the famous family, on the phone with her mom thing. But I wouldn't call HER famous considering I had no idea who she was!!