Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:University of Student Carens. Private universities have the luxury of tweaking the variables that can boost their US News ranking much more quickly than public universities. No private university is more adept than gaming the US News ranking system than the University of Spoiled Children. Their 12% acceptance rate is laughable. In reality, it is 38%. I analyzed the scattergrams for acceptances and rejections for My child's high school. USC rejected a ton of applicants whose SAT scores were over 1460. Why would USC reject applicants with SAT scores that are so much higher than the USC mean? The answer is that USC analytics predicted that kids with very high SATs were using USC as a safety school and would go to Stanford, UC Berkeley, an Ivy, or Ivy equivalent. That is how USC artificially and unethically inflates its yield rate, while shrinking its acceptance rate. I don't know for sure, but wouldn't be surprised if two of the variables that US News uses to rank universities are acceptance and yield rates.
My kid is going through a love affair with USC, and hasn't even seen the campus and what a total shithole LA is. By available objective measures, USC is on the same level as University of Wisconsin, University of Maryland, University of Florida, University of Washington, or University of Illinois. However, USC ranking is much higher.
![]()
Truly. Kind of makes you wonder when someone revives a year-plus-old thread to spew bile. I guess they don’t live in sunny, happy Southern California. Maybe it would lower their BP if they did.![]()
USC is ranked highly in film and music, and cuts tuition in half for NMFs to draw some spectacularly talented students. Good for them, I say.
Nope and nope. Good guesses, though, and thanks for playing.Anonymous wrote:University of Student Carens. Private universities have the luxury of tweaking the variables that can boost their US News ranking much more quickly than public universities. No private university is more adept than gaming the US News ranking system than the University of Spoiled Children. Their 12% acceptance rate is laughable. In reality, it is 38%. I analyzed the scattergrams for acceptances and rejections for My child's high school. USC rejected a ton of applicants whose SAT scores were over 1460. Why would USC reject applicants with SAT scores that are so much higher than the USC mean? The answer is that USC analytics predicted that kids with very high SATs were using USC as a safety school and would go to Stanford, UC Berkeley, an Ivy, or Ivy equivalent. That is how USC artificially and unethically inflates its yield rate, while shrinking its acceptance rate. I don't know for sure, but wouldn't be surprised if two of the variables that US News uses to rank universities are acceptance and yield rates.
My kid is going through a love affair with USC, and hasn't even seen the campus and what a total shithole LA is. By available objective measures, USC is on the same level as University of Wisconsin, University of Maryland, University of Florida, University of Washington, or University of Illinois. However, USC ranking is much higher.
Anonymous wrote:University of Student Carens. Private universities have the luxury of tweaking the variables that can boost their US News ranking much more quickly than public universities. No private university is more adept than gaming the US News ranking system than the University of Spoiled Children. Their 12% acceptance rate is laughable. In reality, it is 38%. I analyzed the scattergrams for acceptances and rejections for My child's high school. USC rejected a ton of applicants whose SAT scores were over 1460. Why would USC reject applicants with SAT scores that are so much higher than the USC mean? The answer is that USC analytics predicted that kids with very high SATs were using USC as a safety school and would go to Stanford, UC Berkeley, an Ivy, or Ivy equivalent. That is how USC artificially and unethically inflates its yield rate, while shrinking its acceptance rate. I don't know for sure, but wouldn't be surprised if two of the variables that US News uses to rank universities are acceptance and yield rates.
My kid is going through a love affair with USC, and hasn't even seen the campus and what a total shithole LA is. By available objective measures, USC is on the same level as University of Wisconsin, University of Maryland, University of Florida, University of Washington, or University of Illinois. However, USC ranking is much higher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:University of Student Carens. Private universities have the luxury of tweaking the variables that can boost their US News ranking much more quickly than public universities. No private university is more adept than gaming the US News ranking system than the University of Spoiled Children. Their 12% acceptance rate is laughable. In reality, it is 38%. I analyzed the scattergrams for acceptances and rejections for My child's high school. USC rejected a ton of applicants whose SAT scores were over 1460. Why would USC reject applicants with SAT scores that are so much higher than the USC mean? The answer is that USC analytics predicted that kids with very high SATs were using USC as a safety school and would go to Stanford, UC Berkeley, an Ivy, or Ivy equivalent. That is how USC artificially and unethically inflates its yield rate, while shrinking its acceptance rate. I don't know for sure, but wouldn't be surprised if two of the variables that US News uses to rank universities are acceptance and yield rates.
My kid is going through a love affair with USC, and hasn't even seen the campus and what a total shithole LA is. By available objective measures, USC is on the same level as University of Wisconsin, University of Maryland, University of Florida, University of Washington, or University of Illinois. However, USC ranking is much higher.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:University of Student Carens. Private universities have the luxury of tweaking the variables that can boost their US News ranking much more quickly than public universities. No private university is more adept than gaming the US News ranking system than the University of Spoiled Children. Their 12% acceptance rate is laughable. In reality, it is 38%. I analyzed the scattergrams for acceptances and rejections for My child's high school. USC rejected a ton of applicants whose SAT scores were over 1460. Why would USC reject applicants with SAT scores that are so much higher than the USC mean? The answer is that USC analytics predicted that kids with very high SATs were using USC as a safety school and would go to Stanford, UC Berkeley, an Ivy, or Ivy equivalent. That is how USC artificially and unethically inflates its yield rate, while shrinking its acceptance rate. I don't know for sure, but wouldn't be surprised if two of the variables that US News uses to rank universities are acceptance and yield rates.
My kid is going through a love affair with USC, and hasn't even seen the campus and what a total shithole LA is. By available objective measures, USC is on the same level as University of Wisconsin, University of Maryland, University of Florida, University of Washington, or University of Illinois. However, USC ranking is much higher.
[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC = University of Spoiled Children, they'll accept those who can pay
Old view. Not accurate.
Anonymous wrote:I knew USC people had an inferiority complex but didn't know it was this bad.
Just because your school is popular on social media doesn't make it more academically prestigious.
Anonymous wrote:Ha! I guess there's not much of a chance that dc who applied RD is getting in. This is my last dc going through college process and it seems like it's just getting crazier. I CANNOT WAIT to be done with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC takes a ton of transfer students every year. Just another way to game the system to make it look more elite. Of course, it’s working.
30% of Berkeley's new admission is transfer
Many from community colleges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So single digit acceptance rate?
Whoohoo!
Go USC!
It's still USC - the University of Spoiled Children that couldn't get into UCLA.
Maybe for CA residents who can pay instate.
People prefer USC outside of CA
This is not true of all people outside of CA.... Our DC applied to UCLA but not USC.
Of course not for every single non-CA person, however, here's a data
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1112632.page
USC is pretty popular, but UCLA or Berkeley NOT
Why would OOS go to a CA public college.
There are much better options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So single digit acceptance rate?
Whoohoo!
Go USC!
It's still USC - the University of Spoiled Children that couldn't get into UCLA.
Maybe for CA residents who can pay instate.
People prefer USC outside of CA
This is not true of all people outside of CA.... Our DC applied to UCLA but not USC.