Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always figure 100 pounds for 5' and then 5 pounds for each additional inch, or at least that's a good average for a medium frame.

I am 5’6” and that would be 130 for me. I am currently 145 and my lean mass is about 113 pounds of that (22% bodyfat). If I managed to keep all of it dieting down to 130, I would be only 13% bodyfat which is extremely low and unhealthy for a female. People call me skinny when I am at 140. So it all depends on your frame size and how much muscle you carry. 130 could be fine for some but definitely not for me.
My advice for OP would be to focus on bodyfat percentage rather than weight. 20-25% is a good target for a female.

Sounds good in theory, but there isn’t a way to accurately know your body fat percentage that is simple, easy, free. Or is there?

DEXA is the preferred method, it is not free though. I would also not waste time and money on the bodyfat measuring scales. They are extremely inaccurate. You can also estimate bodyfat through measurements of waist vs. other body parts. It wont be as accurate as DEXA though which is quite accessible in the DMV. The cheapest I found was at the Bodymass gym in Arlington.

I don’t think a DEXA scan is a realistic for most people to be getting on a semi-regular basis to track body fat. Be real

Dp. Seriously. Just take an objective look at yourself, naked, in front of a mirror. I'm 5'7, currently 145, fighting weight (where I look and feel my best) is 135. When I look at my body, I see my stomach is doughy, I have love handles/muffin top and my arms, legs and butt are jiggly. I've been doing as others at dcum have preached: living with extra weight so that I can enjoy the pleasure of eating crap and a lot of it. Problem is, I don't like what I see in the mirror, especially because I know how great I look and feel 10 pounds lighter. Team bmi, team goal weight, team you don't need dexa to tell you to clean up your diet and exercise more.

I was not claiming you NEED DEXA. I was just answering what is the most accurate way to obtain your bodyfat percentage if you care enough to know. Looking in the mirror is fine but many skinny looking people would be surprised that their BF percentage is actually fairly high as they carry close to no muscle. Target body weight, which I actually also have, is easier to determine when you know what your starting body composition actually is.

But you (or someone) said ideal body weight should be based on body fat percentage. Given this is only accurately resulted through a DEXA scan, I don’t think this is very helpful. Im not in DC, but I’m in a decent size city, and as far as I know, the only DEXA scans being done are ordered by Drs for bone density. Probably bigger cities have them like you said, but still, it is something you have to make an appointment for, pay for, and drive to. Maybe OP can do this. But if not, just look in the mirror. Do you have good
muscle tone, definition, mass? How soft are you? BMI? That is just as good for the general purpose of average people

In DC, you can get a DEXA scan at CompositionID for $125.

https://www.compositionid.com/locations/washington-dc/book-now/

One reason that getting a DEXA scan is useful is that most people — including famous athletes — are terrible at objectively assessing their body fat. Also, most people wildly overestimate the amount of visible fat that goes with any given body fat percentage. On the weightlifting forum I frequent, guys who look like they have 25% or higher body fat will post pictures of themselves saying things like “currently at 14% BF, should I cut or bulk?”

This reference is useful:

At Bodymass you can get a package of four for 200. And I agree with the self assessments. People usually grossly underestimate their bodyfat. I am also quite amused by many of the booty transformations posted all over TikTok and weightlifting groups. In majority of cases it is mostly just lucky fat distribution while the muscle added through lifting is minimal.

Frequent DEXA scanning is a symptom of disordered eating.

I do about 4 scans a year on average. Not sure if that is more disordered than standing on the scale every day which many would consider normal. And my average calories never drop below 2100 and that is when I am cutting.. If that means being disordered, I am cool with it.

Ok. Yes this is bizarre behavior and somewhere in the spectrum of OCD/disordered

Aren't we all somewhere on the spectrum?

No, you weirdo. Get 4 DEXA scans per year is entirely abnormal behavior. Maybe super self absorbed/narcissistic or maybe disordered, I don’t know. But no where in the realm of normal fitness maintenance

Your ableist language is really gross. Someone making different health choices than you has nothing to do with the diagnoses that you’re throwing around as insults. You should really work on not getting so upset and not using bigoted language in responding to people that you disagree with. I get that this topic is really upsetting to you for some reason, but you should read your responses and realize that you come across as an unhinged troll, which does nothing to convince anyone of anything other than that you’re an unpleasant person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always figure 100 pounds for 5' and then 5 pounds for each additional inch, or at least that's a good average for a medium frame.

I am 5’6” and that would be 130 for me. I am currently 145 and my lean mass is about 113 pounds of that (22% bodyfat). If I managed to keep all of it dieting down to 130, I would be only 13% bodyfat which is extremely low and unhealthy for a female. People call me skinny when I am at 140. So it all depends on your frame size and how much muscle you carry. 130 could be fine for some but definitely not for me.
My advice for OP would be to focus on bodyfat percentage rather than weight. 20-25% is a good target for a female.

Sounds good in theory, but there isn’t a way to accurately know your body fat percentage that is simple, easy, free. Or is there?

DEXA is the preferred method, it is not free though. I would also not waste time and money on the bodyfat measuring scales. They are extremely inaccurate. You can also estimate bodyfat through measurements of waist vs. other body parts. It wont be as accurate as DEXA though which is quite accessible in the DMV. The cheapest I found was at the Bodymass gym in Arlington.

I don’t think a DEXA scan is a realistic for most people to be getting on a semi-regular basis to track body fat. Be real

Dp. Seriously. Just take an objective look at yourself, naked, in front of a mirror. I'm 5'7, currently 145, fighting weight (where I look and feel my best) is 135. When I look at my body, I see my stomach is doughy, I have love handles/muffin top and my arms, legs and butt are jiggly. I've been doing as others at dcum have preached: living with extra weight so that I can enjoy the pleasure of eating crap and a lot of it. Problem is, I don't like what I see in the mirror, especially because I know how great I look and feel 10 pounds lighter. Team bmi, team goal weight, team you don't need dexa to tell you to clean up your diet and exercise more.

I was not claiming you NEED DEXA. I was just answering what is the most accurate way to obtain your bodyfat percentage if you care enough to know. Looking in the mirror is fine but many skinny looking people would be surprised that their BF percentage is actually fairly high as they carry close to no muscle. Target body weight, which I actually also have, is easier to determine when you know what your starting body composition actually is.

But you (or someone) said ideal body weight should be based on body fat percentage. Given this is only accurately resulted through a DEXA scan, I don’t think this is very helpful. Im not in DC, but I’m in a decent size city, and as far as I know, the only DEXA scans being done are ordered by Drs for bone density. Probably bigger cities have them like you said, but still, it is something you have to make an appointment for, pay for, and drive to. Maybe OP can do this. But if not, just look in the mirror. Do you have good
muscle tone, definition, mass? How soft are you? BMI? That is just as good for the general purpose of average people

I agree with the visual assessment but that by itself won’t help you determine what a good goal weight is. Which is why I would not focus on it. You can just continue with visual assessments and measurements once you have determined what it is that you need to do, I.e. gain muscle, lose fat or both. I would still claim though that DEXA is an excellent tool if you have access to it to assess true progress because sometimes you just need a reality check. For example I was trying to gain muscle for 6 months last year. I did a DEXA at the beginning and at the end. I was busting my behind in the gym, all my lifts went up, I thought I was seeing new muscle. And you know what my DEXA told me? That my entire almost 10lbs increase in weight was fat. I am just quite lucky that my fat distributes fairly evenly and I was still able to wear the same clothes. Sometimes we just refuse to see the reality in the mirror. That is why I prefer hard reliable data. But of course I understand that it is not feasible for everyone, and in that case measurements, scale weight and visual assessment can work as a second best.

Why would this happen when you were working so hard in the gym?

He was eating too much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always figure 100 pounds for 5' and then 5 pounds for each additional inch, or at least that's a good average for a medium frame.

I am 5’6” and that would be 130 for me. I am currently 145 and my lean mass is about 113 pounds of that (22% bodyfat). If I managed to keep all of it dieting down to 130, I would be only 13% bodyfat which is extremely low and unhealthy for a female. People call me skinny when I am at 140. So it all depends on your frame size and how much muscle you carry. 130 could be fine for some but definitely not for me.
My advice for OP would be to focus on bodyfat percentage rather than weight. 20-25% is a good target for a female.

Sounds good in theory, but there isn’t a way to accurately know your body fat percentage that is simple, easy, free. Or is there?

DEXA is the preferred method, it is not free though. I would also not waste time and money on the bodyfat measuring scales. They are extremely inaccurate. You can also estimate bodyfat through measurements of waist vs. other body parts. It wont be as accurate as DEXA though which is quite accessible in the DMV. The cheapest I found was at the Bodymass gym in Arlington.

I don’t think a DEXA scan is a realistic for most people to be getting on a semi-regular basis to track body fat. Be real

Dp. Seriously. Just take an objective look at yourself, naked, in front of a mirror. I'm 5'7, currently 145, fighting weight (where I look and feel my best) is 135. When I look at my body, I see my stomach is doughy, I have love handles/muffin top and my arms, legs and butt are jiggly. I've been doing as others at dcum have preached: living with extra weight so that I can enjoy the pleasure of eating crap and a lot of it. Problem is, I don't like what I see in the mirror, especially because I know how great I look and feel 10 pounds lighter. Team bmi, team goal weight, team you don't need dexa to tell you to clean up your diet and exercise more.

I was not claiming you NEED DEXA. I was just answering what is the most accurate way to obtain your bodyfat percentage if you care enough to know. Looking in the mirror is fine but many skinny looking people would be surprised that their BF percentage is actually fairly high as they carry close to no muscle. Target body weight, which I actually also have, is easier to determine when you know what your starting body composition actually is.

But you (or someone) said ideal body weight should be based on body fat percentage. Given this is only accurately resulted through a DEXA scan, I don’t think this is very helpful. Im not in DC, but I’m in a decent size city, and as far as I know, the only DEXA scans being done are ordered by Drs for bone density. Probably bigger cities have them like you said, but still, it is something you have to make an appointment for, pay for, and drive to. Maybe OP can do this. But if not, just look in the mirror. Do you have good
muscle tone, definition, mass? How soft are you? BMI? That is just as good for the general purpose of average people

I agree with the visual assessment but that by itself won’t help you determine what a good goal weight is. Which is why I would not focus on it. You can just continue with visual assessments and measurements once you have determined what it is that you need to do, I.e. gain muscle, lose fat or both. I would still claim though that DEXA is an excellent tool if you have access to it to assess true progress because sometimes you just need a reality check. For example I was trying to gain muscle for 6 months last year. I did a DEXA at the beginning and at the end. I was busting my behind in the gym, all my lifts went up, I thought I was seeing new muscle. And you know what my DEXA told me? That my entire almost 10lbs increase in weight was fat. I am just quite lucky that my fat distributes fairly evenly and I was still able to wear the same clothes. Sometimes we just refuse to see the reality in the mirror. That is why I prefer hard reliable data. But of course I understand that it is not feasible for everyone, and in that case measurements, scale weight and visual assessment can work as a second best.

Why would this happen when you were working so hard in the gym?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always figure 100 pounds for 5' and then 5 pounds for each additional inch, or at least that's a good average for a medium frame.

I am 5’6” and that would be 130 for me. I am currently 145 and my lean mass is about 113 pounds of that (22% bodyfat). If I managed to keep all of it dieting down to 130, I would be only 13% bodyfat which is extremely low and unhealthy for a female. People call me skinny when I am at 140. So it all depends on your frame size and how much muscle you carry. 130 could be fine for some but definitely not for me.
My advice for OP would be to focus on bodyfat percentage rather than weight. 20-25% is a good target for a female.

Sounds good in theory, but there isn’t a way to accurately know your body fat percentage that is simple, easy, free. Or is there?

DEXA is the preferred method, it is not free though. I would also not waste time and money on the bodyfat measuring scales. They are extremely inaccurate. You can also estimate bodyfat through measurements of waist vs. other body parts. It wont be as accurate as DEXA though which is quite accessible in the DMV. The cheapest I found was at the Bodymass gym in Arlington.

I don’t think a DEXA scan is a realistic for most people to be getting on a semi-regular basis to track body fat. Be real

Dp. Seriously. Just take an objective look at yourself, naked, in front of a mirror. I'm 5'7, currently 145, fighting weight (where I look and feel my best) is 135. When I look at my body, I see my stomach is doughy, I have love handles/muffin top and my arms, legs and butt are jiggly. I've been doing as others at dcum have preached: living with extra weight so that I can enjoy the pleasure of eating crap and a lot of it. Problem is, I don't like what I see in the mirror, especially because I know how great I look and feel 10 pounds lighter. Team bmi, team goal weight, team you don't need dexa to tell you to clean up your diet and exercise more.

I was not claiming you NEED DEXA. I was just answering what is the most accurate way to obtain your bodyfat percentage if you care enough to know. Looking in the mirror is fine but many skinny looking people would be surprised that their BF percentage is actually fairly high as they carry close to no muscle. Target body weight, which I actually also have, is easier to determine when you know what your starting body composition actually is.

But you (or someone) said ideal body weight should be based on body fat percentage. Given this is only accurately resulted through a DEXA scan, I don’t think this is very helpful. Im not in DC, but I’m in a decent size city, and as far as I know, the only DEXA scans being done are ordered by Drs for bone density. Probably bigger cities have them like you said, but still, it is something you have to make an appointment for, pay for, and drive to. Maybe OP can do this. But if not, just look in the mirror. Do you have good
muscle tone, definition, mass? How soft are you? BMI? That is just as good for the general purpose of average people

I agree with the visual assessment but that by itself won’t help you determine what a good goal weight is. Which is why I would not focus on it. You can just continue with visual assessments and measurements once you have determined what it is that you need to do, I.e. gain muscle, lose fat or both. I would still claim though that DEXA is an excellent tool if you have access to it to assess true progress because sometimes you just need a reality check. For example I was trying to gain muscle for 6 months last year. I did a DEXA at the beginning and at the end. I was busting my behind in the gym, all my lifts went up, I thought I was seeing new muscle. And you know what my DEXA told me? That my entire almost 10lbs increase in weight was fat. I am just quite lucky that my fat distributes fairly evenly and I was still able to wear the same clothes. Sometimes we just refuse to see the reality in the mirror. That is why I prefer hard reliable data. But of course I understand that it is not feasible for everyone, and in that case measurements, scale weight and visual assessment can work as a second best.

Why would this happen when you were working so hard in the gym?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always figure 100 pounds for 5' and then 5 pounds for each additional inch, or at least that's a good average for a medium frame.

I am 5’6” and that would be 130 for me. I am currently 145 and my lean mass is about 113 pounds of that (22% bodyfat). If I managed to keep all of it dieting down to 130, I would be only 13% bodyfat which is extremely low and unhealthy for a female. People call me skinny when I am at 140. So it all depends on your frame size and how much muscle you carry. 130 could be fine for some but definitely not for me.
My advice for OP would be to focus on bodyfat percentage rather than weight. 20-25% is a good target for a female.

Sounds good in theory, but there isn’t a way to accurately know your body fat percentage that is simple, easy, free. Or is there?

DEXA is the preferred method, it is not free though. I would also not waste time and money on the bodyfat measuring scales. They are extremely inaccurate. You can also estimate bodyfat through measurements of waist vs. other body parts. It wont be as accurate as DEXA though which is quite accessible in the DMV. The cheapest I found was at the Bodymass gym in Arlington.

I don’t think a DEXA scan is a realistic for most people to be getting on a semi-regular basis to track body fat. Be real

Dp. Seriously. Just take an objective look at yourself, naked, in front of a mirror. I'm 5'7, currently 145, fighting weight (where I look and feel my best) is 135. When I look at my body, I see my stomach is doughy, I have love handles/muffin top and my arms, legs and butt are jiggly. I've been doing as others at dcum have preached: living with extra weight so that I can enjoy the pleasure of eating crap and a lot of it. Problem is, I don't like what I see in the mirror, especially because I know how great I look and feel 10 pounds lighter. Team bmi, team goal weight, team you don't need dexa to tell you to clean up your diet and exercise more.

I was not claiming you NEED DEXA. I was just answering what is the most accurate way to obtain your bodyfat percentage if you care enough to know. Looking in the mirror is fine but many skinny looking people would be surprised that their BF percentage is actually fairly high as they carry close to no muscle. Target body weight, which I actually also have, is easier to determine when you know what your starting body composition actually is.

But you (or someone) said ideal body weight should be based on body fat percentage. Given this is only accurately resulted through a DEXA scan, I don’t think this is very helpful. Im not in DC, but I’m in a decent size city, and as far as I know, the only DEXA scans being done are ordered by Drs for bone density. Probably bigger cities have them like you said, but still, it is something you have to make an appointment for, pay for, and drive to. Maybe OP can do this. But if not, just look in the mirror. Do you have good
muscle tone, definition, mass? How soft are you? BMI? That is just as good for the general purpose of average people

I agree with the visual assessment but that by itself won’t help you determine what a good goal weight is. Which is why I would not focus on it. You can just continue with visual assessments and measurements once you have determined what it is that you need to do, I.e. gain muscle, lose fat or both. I would still claim though that DEXA is an excellent tool if you have access to it to assess true progress because sometimes you just need a reality check. For example I was trying to gain muscle for 6 months last year. I did a DEXA at the beginning and at the end. I was busting my behind in the gym, all my lifts went up, I thought I was seeing new muscle. And you know what my DEXA told me? That my entire almost 10lbs increase in weight was fat. I am just quite lucky that my fat distributes fairly evenly and I was still able to wear the same clothes. Sometimes we just refuse to see the reality in the mirror. That is why I prefer hard reliable data. But of course I understand that it is not feasible for everyone, and in that case measurements, scale weight and visual assessment can work as a second best.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always figure 100 pounds for 5' and then 5 pounds for each additional inch, or at least that's a good average for a medium frame.

I am 5’6” and that would be 130 for me. I am currently 145 and my lean mass is about 113 pounds of that (22% bodyfat). If I managed to keep all of it dieting down to 130, I would be only 13% bodyfat which is extremely low and unhealthy for a female. People call me skinny when I am at 140. So it all depends on your frame size and how much muscle you carry. 130 could be fine for some but definitely not for me.
My advice for OP would be to focus on bodyfat percentage rather than weight. 20-25% is a good target for a female.

Sounds good in theory, but there isn’t a way to accurately know your body fat percentage that is simple, easy, free. Or is there?

DEXA is the preferred method, it is not free though. I would also not waste time and money on the bodyfat measuring scales. They are extremely inaccurate. You can also estimate bodyfat through measurements of waist vs. other body parts. It wont be as accurate as DEXA though which is quite accessible in the DMV. The cheapest I found was at the Bodymass gym in Arlington.

I don’t think a DEXA scan is a realistic for most people to be getting on a semi-regular basis to track body fat. Be real

Dp. Seriously. Just take an objective look at yourself, naked, in front of a mirror. I'm 5'7, currently 145, fighting weight (where I look and feel my best) is 135. When I look at my body, I see my stomach is doughy, I have love handles/muffin top and my arms, legs and butt are jiggly. I've been doing as others at dcum have preached: living with extra weight so that I can enjoy the pleasure of eating crap and a lot of it. Problem is, I don't like what I see in the mirror, especially because I know how great I look and feel 10 pounds lighter. Team bmi, team goal weight, team you don't need dexa to tell you to clean up your diet and exercise more.

I was not claiming you NEED DEXA. I was just answering what is the most accurate way to obtain your bodyfat percentage if you care enough to know. Looking in the mirror is fine but many skinny looking people would be surprised that their BF percentage is actually fairly high as they carry close to no muscle. Target body weight, which I actually also have, is easier to determine when you know what your starting body composition actually is.

But you (or someone) said ideal body weight should be based on body fat percentage. Given this is only accurately resulted through a DEXA scan, I don’t think this is very helpful. Im not in DC, but I’m in a decent size city, and as far as I know, the only DEXA scans being done are ordered by Drs for bone density. Probably bigger cities have them like you said, but still, it is something you have to make an appointment for, pay for, and drive to. Maybe OP can do this. But if not, just look in the mirror. Do you have good
muscle tone, definition, mass? How soft are you? BMI? That is just as good for the general purpose of average people

In DC, you can get a DEXA scan at CompositionID for $125.

https://www.compositionid.com/locations/washington-dc/book-now/

One reason that getting a DEXA scan is useful is that most people — including famous athletes — are terrible at objectively assessing their body fat. Also, most people wildly overestimate the amount of visible fat that goes with any given body fat percentage. On the weightlifting forum I frequent, guys who look like they have 25% or higher body fat will post pictures of themselves saying things like “currently at 14% BF, should I cut or bulk?”

This reference is useful:

At Bodymass you can get a package of four for 200. And I agree with the self assessments. People usually grossly underestimate their bodyfat. I am also quite amused by many of the booty transformations posted all over TikTok and weightlifting groups. In majority of cases it is mostly just lucky fat distribution while the muscle added through lifting is minimal.

Frequent DEXA scanning is a symptom of disordered eating.

I do about 4 scans a year on average. Not sure if that is more disordered than standing on the scale every day which many would consider normal. And my average calories never drop below 2100 and that is when I am cutting.. If that means being disordered, I am cool with it.

Ok. Yes this is bizarre behavior and somewhere in the spectrum of OCD/disordered

Aren't we all somewhere on the spectrum?

No, you weirdo. Get 4 DEXA scans per year is entirely abnormal behavior. Maybe super self absorbed/narcissistic or maybe disordered, I don’t know. But no where in the realm of normal fitness maintenance

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always figure 100 pounds for 5' and then 5 pounds for each additional inch, or at least that's a good average for a medium frame.

I am 5’6” and that would be 130 for me. I am currently 145 and my lean mass is about 113 pounds of that (22% bodyfat). If I managed to keep all of it dieting down to 130, I would be only 13% bodyfat which is extremely low and unhealthy for a female. People call me skinny when I am at 140. So it all depends on your frame size and how much muscle you carry. 130 could be fine for some but definitely not for me.
My advice for OP would be to focus on bodyfat percentage rather than weight. 20-25% is a good target for a female.

Sounds good in theory, but there isn’t a way to accurately know your body fat percentage that is simple, easy, free. Or is there?

DEXA is the preferred method, it is not free though. I would also not waste time and money on the bodyfat measuring scales. They are extremely inaccurate. You can also estimate bodyfat through measurements of waist vs. other body parts. It wont be as accurate as DEXA though which is quite accessible in the DMV. The cheapest I found was at the Bodymass gym in Arlington.

I don’t think a DEXA scan is a realistic for most people to be getting on a semi-regular basis to track body fat. Be real

Dp. Seriously. Just take an objective look at yourself, naked, in front of a mirror. I'm 5'7, currently 145, fighting weight (where I look and feel my best) is 135. When I look at my body, I see my stomach is doughy, I have love handles/muffin top and my arms, legs and butt are jiggly. I've been doing as others at dcum have preached: living with extra weight so that I can enjoy the pleasure of eating crap and a lot of it. Problem is, I don't like what I see in the mirror, especially because I know how great I look and feel 10 pounds lighter. Team bmi, team goal weight, team you don't need dexa to tell you to clean up your diet and exercise more.

I was not claiming you NEED DEXA. I was just answering what is the most accurate way to obtain your bodyfat percentage if you care enough to know. Looking in the mirror is fine but many skinny looking people would be surprised that their BF percentage is actually fairly high as they carry close to no muscle. Target body weight, which I actually also have, is easier to determine when you know what your starting body composition actually is.

But you (or someone) said ideal body weight should be based on body fat percentage. Given this is only accurately resulted through a DEXA scan, I don’t think this is very helpful. Im not in DC, but I’m in a decent size city, and as far as I know, the only DEXA scans being done are ordered by Drs for bone density. Probably bigger cities have them like you said, but still, it is something you have to make an appointment for, pay for, and drive to. Maybe OP can do this. But if not, just look in the mirror. Do you have good
muscle tone, definition, mass? How soft are you? BMI? That is just as good for the general purpose of average people

I agree with the visual assessment but that by itself won’t help you determine what a good goal weight is. Which is why I would not focus on it. You can just continue with visual assessments and measurements once you have determined what it is that you need to do, I.e. gain muscle, lose fat or both. I would still claim though that DEXA is an excellent tool if you have access to it to assess true progress because sometimes you just need a reality check. For example I was trying to gain muscle for 6 months last year. I did a DEXA at the beginning and at the end. I was busting my behind in the gym, all my lifts went up, I thought I was seeing new muscle. And you know what my DEXA told me? That my entire almost 10lbs increase in weight was fat. I am just quite lucky that my fat distributes fairly evenly and I was still able to wear the same clothes. Sometimes we just refuse to see the reality in the mirror. That is why I prefer hard reliable data. But of course I understand that it is not feasible for everyone, and in that case measurements, scale weight and visual assessment can work as a second best.

Funny that this is your conclusion as opposed to, say, maybe the DEXA was inaccurate or poorly calibrated. Monitoring your body like that is not normal behavior and is certainly not necessary for health.

DP. I’m sorry if you’ve suffered from eating disorders - they seem to be really tough.

However, you should consider that not everyone does. Lots of people don’t have particularly strong feelings about their weight and don’t strongly identify their self worth or value with their weight. For us, it’s fun to see what our bodies can do, since the human body is such an amazing machine. In my case, I wanted to see if in my late 40s I could get my 5K under what it was when I ran JV track in high school, and so I got it down to the high 18:00s. That was fun to do, and it involved a fair amount of weight loss as a side effect of running a lot - 200 down to 175 as a 6’2” man. When my knees started acting up, I decided to see if I could get stronger than I was in college. So, I’ve been doing that for a few years. My weight has fluctuated between 190 and 220 depending on whether I’m bulking or cutting or busy and not working out, and my lifts are much, much higher than they were in college (although not impressive at all by powerlifting standards). I get DEXA scans to help me decide how to periodize my training and nutrition. For me this is fun and motivates me to stay active.

You should avoid projecting your own struggles with weight and body image onto other people.

if you don’t have strong feelings about your weight, why tf are you exposing yourself to radiation to measure your body fat percentage?

Because I want to know how my body composition is affected by the combination of my nutrition and lifting? I thought that was reasonably clear by what I wrote already. Are you just looking for an argument? As mentioned in the tread already the radiation doses are extremely low.

Elective body composition DEXAS ought to be grounds for professional discipline. Totally bad idea.

DXA scans expose people to about 3 days worth of general background radiation —- less for people who live at altitude or in poorly ventilated houses with higher radon exposure.

Repeated scans result in a cumulative increased dose, which is only justified if there is medical necessity (there is not, in this case).

https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/other-specialities-and-imaging-modalities/dxa-bone-mineral-densitometry/patients#7