Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My son wants an all-boys birthday party but he has a friend whose mom drags the little sister to all the parties.
She’s a sweetheart but we have a limited headcount and she would be the only girl at the party.
Should I just let her tag along anyway or should I tell the mom we only want boys?
The party involves an activity similar to laser tag.
I don't see what her gender has to do with it.
Surely, if your kid is old enough to play laser tag, then it's a drop off party right? Just say "Just a heads up that we can't accommodate siblings due to the headcount, but feel free to drop off!"
I agree. He is being a misygonistic jerk about this.
He's a little boy who wants a boys only party just like girls want only "girls" party! He has lots of time before he can be accused of misygonistic jerk!
Misogyny starts early. He probably gets it from his father.
Our next door neighbors five year old daughter demanded an all girls party. My son, who she sometimes plays with, wasn’t invited while our other neighbors daughters were. Is that also misogyny?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just not appropriate to bring an uninvited sibling to a party. Period.
I had this happen to me at my DD’s party in kinder. The site allowed 20 and I invited all 24 from her class knowing someone wouldn’t be able to come. I explained this to a mom who asked if her younger DD could come, and she still pressured me endlessly.
Wow, rude. I am having a party for my kindergarten DD and inviting the class. I wonder if people will ask to bring siblings. I’m already at capacity with the class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What most of you are missing is to view this through the lens of gender equity.
The sister is being excluded solely on the basis of her gender!
What? It’s mostly the age and the fact that she’s not friends with the birthday kid. I have 2 boys 3 years apart and I don’t allow them to tag along at parties for the other one’s friends, unless the host lets me know it’s okay.
Stop making excuses for misogyny and sexism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What most of you are missing is to view this through the lens of gender equity.
The sister is being excluded solely on the basis of her gender!
What? It’s mostly the age and the fact that she’s not friends with the birthday kid. I have 2 boys 3 years apart and I don’t allow them to tag along at parties for the other one’s friends, unless the host lets me know it’s okay.
Stop making excuses for misogyny and sexism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What most of you are missing is to view this through the lens of gender equity.
The sister is being excluded solely on the basis of her gender!
What? It’s mostly the age and the fact that she’s not friends with the birthday kid. I have 2 boys 3 years apart and I don’t allow them to tag along at parties for the other one’s friends, unless the host lets me know it’s okay.
Stop making excuses for misogyny and sexism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What most of you are missing is to view this through the lens of gender equity.
The sister is being excluded solely on the basis of her gender!
What? It’s mostly the age and the fact that she’s not friends with the birthday kid. I have 2 boys 3 years apart and I don’t allow them to tag along at parties for the other one’s friends, unless the host lets me know it’s okay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What most of you are missing is to view this through the lens of gender equity.
The sister is being excluded solely on the basis of her gender!
What? It’s mostly the age and the fact that she’s not friends with the birthday kid. I have 2 boys 3 years apart and I don’t allow them to tag along at parties for the other one’s friends, unless the host lets me know it’s okay.
Anonymous wrote:What most of you are missing is to view this through the lens of gender equity.
The sister is being excluded solely on the basis of her gender!