. This is a nice looking light brown color leather bag that I could actually wear to dinners w girlfriends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mulberry/Strathberry/Smythson/IB/Maje poster here.
I’d say the next level bags from this point up that are worth carrying would be Givenchy, Altazurra, Hermes & some others.
Would not go near Michael Kors, Kate Spade especially if over 26. Nor Tory Burch if over 30.
If you’re looking for some style on a budget look at Rebecca Minkoff.
I just pulled a Kate Spade tote bag out of the closet, and I’m enjoying carrying it again. I’m in my 40s.
I carry a Kate Spade bag as my every day bag too, late 30s. They are so played-out and untrendy now that I am confident no one thinks I’m trying to impress them. Just a good-value functional bag. I feel the same way about Coach. It’s so uncool as to be effortlessly cool (although I hate the logo print)
Anonymous wrote:The real mark of status is being able to buy whatever you want, regardless of the price point, because it matches your personal style. I live in NYC and husband works in high finance, so we have a lot of billionaires and near-billionaires in our immediate social and work orbit. They don't all wear Chanel and Hermes because it's Chanel and Hermes. They wear it because Chanel and Hermes stores are in the general area where they tend to shop, and they saw a bag they thought was cute and they bought it. On the other hand, I just as often see them wearing unremarkable and even relatively reasonably-priced bags that they picked up on a whim at Saks. Unfortunately, status is a whole picture kind of thing. If you're wearing a $5k Chanel bag with a polyester top, brassy hair, and uneven skin tone, you will look like a middle class person who decided to spend their whole bonus check on a fun splurge (and there's nothing wrong with that!). If you're wearing a $500 Staud bag with impeccably tailored clothes made from high end textiles, hair that is maintained every six weeks at the salon and flawless skin from prescription skincare and regular dermatological treatments, you will look high end. This is all to say, cultivate your own style and buy what you love, regardless of the price point. That will cultivate a much better image than buying a "status" handbag.
Anonymous wrote:My SIL is constantly getting new designer bags and she always talks about how they are an investment. Is that true even if you use them? She wears hers all the time but then talks about how she could sell them for more than she paid.
Is that really true? (I’m not looking to become a purse reseller or anything, just curious).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mulberry/Strathberry/Smythson/IB/Maje poster here.
I’d say the next level bags from this point up that are worth carrying would be Givenchy, Altazurra, Hermes & some others.
Would not go near Michael Kors, Kate Spade especially if over 26. Nor Tory Burch if over 30.
If you’re looking for some style on a budget look at Rebecca Minkoff.
I just pulled a Kate Spade tote bag out of the closet, and I’m enjoying carrying it again. I’m in my 40s.
Anonymous wrote:Are Birkins and Kellys really “better” bags as far as material, craftsmanship and function, are concerned. I am not getting the appeal to go through a “process” just to spend 10k+ on a handbag.
I would love to hear honest feedback from ppl who have gone down the Hermes path..
Anonymous wrote:Once you’ve enjoyed owning an Hermes bag, there’s no going back… everything else feels like slumming TBH.