Anonymous wrote:Several neighbors have inflatable Christmas decor in their front yard, and it is so tacky blowing around in the wind. Does anyone else find this method of decorating tacky and cheap looking?
Anonymous wrote:A few years ago, my dog suddenly stopped wanting to go for walks. Or, he’d start the walk, but when we got to a certain place around the block, he would sit down and refuse to go any further.
We figured out it was a neighbor’s inflatables that were freaking him out and he didn’t want to walk past them.
I don’t like them. I much prefer lights.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are the opposite of beautiful or elegant, but perfect for entertaining kids.
Don't we have other ways to entertain kids? It is unclear to me why we have to every aspect of a holiday about kids. What about lonely older people without kids -- does no one care about making them happy at the holidays?
Anonymous wrote:It’s tacky, but in a joyful way. There’s a difference between that and, like, a wealthy person giving a kid a used broken toy, which is also tacky but grim.
Anonymous wrote:Not everything has to be for kids. I think the inflatables are ugly and cartoony and my kid likes regular light displays, too, so it seems like the obvious choice is to do the thing that's more broadly appealing. Plus there are lots of tacky, kid-centric holiday activities and displays in commercial places. You don't have to turn your house into one.
Personally, I like beauty around the holidays. It's so dark out and the weather is cold and dreary, and seeing a really beautifully decorated home warms my soul. The giant inflatables just don't do anything for me and sometimes they are weird or disturbing looking.