Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:19
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
Oh that’s the issue… don’t know the difference between an informant and an undercover agent. Poor guy is so confused and frightened. Have mercy.
There are legalities involving embedding FBI agents. Entrapment becomes a real concern
They weren’t agents.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:19
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
DP joining in here. Who is we? And what exactly are you talking about? Do you know what an informant is? Not an FBI agent. A witness.
The people. And yes, I do.
By whom? Because I was laughing on J6 about how stupid those people were to think their little fight clubs weren’t completely compromised by informants. And informant is a person who finds themselves involved in a criminal conspiracy, and decides to cooperate with law enforcement. There are a lot of them around.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:18
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
Typical. Grown a$$ men storm the Capitol…and claim it’s not their fault? Try to shift the blame to some informant with some conspiracy?
Grow a pair and own your actions.
I’d like to see more video and get more information first.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:17
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
Oh that’s the issue… don’t know the difference between an informant and an undercover agent. Poor guy is so confused and frightened. Have mercy.
There are legalities involving embedding FBI agents. Entrapment becomes a real concern
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:17
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
Typical. Grown a$$ men storm the Capitol…and claim it’s not their fault? Try to shift the blame to some informant with some conspiracy?
Grow a pair and own your actions.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:17
Subject: Re:Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.
Link?
WaPo and other papers.
Please link to where “WaPo and other papers” reported that “the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/investigators-see-ego-not-money-as-trump-s-motive-on-classified-papers/ar-AA146LqQ
That doesn’t say what you say it claims. That is an anonymously sourced opinion from someone (likely in the trump camp) who claims to know what prosecutors believe about his motivation for stealing classified documents. Do we have to spell everything out for you? The FBI didn’t make any public announcements.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:16
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
DP joining in here. Who is we? And what exactly are you talking about? Do you know what an informant is? Not an FBI agent. A witness.
The people. And yes, I do.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:13
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
Oh that’s the issue… don’t know the difference between an informant and an undercover agent. Poor guy is so confused and frightened. Have mercy.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:13
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
DP joining in here. Who is we? And what exactly are you talking about? Do you know what an informant is? Not an FBI agent. A witness.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:12
Subject: Re:Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.
Link?
WaPo and other papers.
Please link to where “WaPo and other papers” reported that “the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/investigators-see-ego-not-money-as-trump-s-motive-on-classified-papers/ar-AA146LqQ
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:08
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
I’m stating that the FBI set people up, like they did in Michigan. We were told they were not embedded on 1/6. Turns out they were
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:05
Subject: Re:Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.
Link?
WaPo and other papers.
Please link to where “WaPo and other papers” reported that “the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.”
Anonymous
11/19/2022 08:02
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html
You think that guy was…an FBI agent?
Why do you think that exactly?
Anonymous
Anonymous
11/19/2022 07:57
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
No, the NYT is: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/oath-keepers-trial-january-6.html