Anonymous wrote:I grew up in CT, basically a burb of NYC. We had many Italian neighborhoods around us. At the Italian weddings I went to, the bride and groom would circulate among the guests, going from table to table, with a special "bag" the bride carried, made out of white satin, embroidered with pearls, etc. She would place envelopes from the guests in the bag. Envelopes full of money. Everyone knew that bringing such an envelope was expected.
It wasn't on the invitation. But yes it seemed to me, even as a kid, as a fancy way to shake down your guests. And it did seem cultural to me - never seen it at a non-Italian wedding. So make of that what you will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people are missing the obvioius here: what you are all really reacting to is the unstated : that only people who need money given to them at a wedding or for an expected baby are poor or lower down on the socio-economic scale, that is why they need money more than gifts. People call these "traditions" tacky or low-class because it orginates when a cultural group is lower class economically speaking. We all know that many ethnic groups who were once identified as mostly poor immigrants, like Italian-Americans (mostly peasants) or Korean-Americans (often refugees), are often now quite well off financially and certainly now longer part of the lower economic rung but, the old traditions stand. To groups of American who were here "before" these various ethnic groups arrived with their different traditions, such behavior was very much out of the norm and regarded with distaste. Each new large group of immigrants deals with their own form of this bias: bringing a tradition or way of behavior that Americans who are second, third, etc.. generation find gross or distatseful or appalling. We are all just suppossed to be less ignorant of our own biases than the WASPs of the 1900s. So, while it may be tacky for a Mayflower WASP descendant to have a money tree or money dance, it is not for an Italian-American.
Wrong. Koreans in Korea, even those that are well-off, still give money at major events and as gifts. It has little to do with being a poor immigrant.
Anonymous wrote:I think people are missing the obvioius here: what you are all really reacting to is the unstated : that only people who need money given to them at a wedding or for an expected baby are poor or lower down on the socio-economic scale, that is why they need money more than gifts. People call these "traditions" tacky or low-class because it orginates when a cultural group is lower class economically speaking. We all know that many ethnic groups who were once identified as mostly poor immigrants, like Italian-Americans (mostly peasants) or Korean-Americans (often refugees), are often now quite well off financially and certainly now longer part of the lower economic rung but, the old traditions stand. To groups of American who were here "before" these various ethnic groups arrived with their different traditions, such behavior was very much out of the norm and regarded with distaste. Each new large group of immigrants deals with their own form of this bias: bringing a tradition or way of behavior that Americans who are second, third, etc.. generation find gross or distatseful or appalling. We are all just suppossed to be less ignorant of our own biases than the WASPs of the 1900s. So, while it may be tacky for a Mayflower WASP descendant to have a money tree or money dance, it is not for an Italian-American.
Anonymous wrote:Giving money is acceptable and expected for a lot of events in my Italian family. Money and food seem to be the answer for anything from a birth to a death.
It is just the way we do things. American culture is way too uptight about money.
It's might nice of you to knock other culture's traditions, isn't it? Feel good about yourself?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wanted to chime in and say I don't find the dollar dance thing offensive-especially given it's a tradition and we're talking about a dollar. The cash tree I think it put out hoping you can rake in big bucks and I have yet to find any evidence it is some tradition going back many years in a culture.
Cash gifts are totally fine as long as they are not expected. We have heard from on these posts about the Korean and Jewish tradition and that did not offend me in the least becomes nobody is told to give money, it's just a tradition among those close to the family.
I attended a wedding where the bride had some kind of lace apron and danced around in a circle for guests to toss in money and, believe me, bulging envelopes and $100 bills were what was being "tossed" into her lace apron. Frankly, I would have been humiliated to have done this but it as an ethnic wedding. Only men were allowed to contribute as the bride gave each of them a kiss. It was obvious that a goodly sum was expected--nothing less than $100.00.
Sounds more like a veiled lap dance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wanted to chime in and say I don't find the dollar dance thing offensive-especially given it's a tradition and we're talking about a dollar. The cash tree I think it put out hoping you can rake in big bucks and I have yet to find any evidence it is some tradition going back many years in a culture.
Cash gifts are totally fine as long as they are not expected. We have heard from on these posts about the Korean and Jewish tradition and that did not offend me in the least becomes nobody is told to give money, it's just a tradition among those close to the family.
I attended a wedding where the bride had some kind of lace apron and danced around in a circle for guests to toss in money and, believe me, bulging envelopes and $100 bills were what was being "tossed" into her lace apron. Frankly, I would have been humiliated to have done this but it as an ethnic wedding. Only men were allowed to contribute as the bride gave each of them a kiss. It was obvious that a goodly sum was expected--nothing less than $100.00.