Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which approach works better?

Wes Moore: My water bill? My bad. It was an oversight and I am correcting it.

Natali Fani-Gonzalez: My property taxes? You have no right to attack me and even though I seek public office, I owe no disclosure obligations to anyone. These are ableist attacks on how my family received benefits that public records indicate I should not be entitled are are disgusting and shameful.

Wow. This story is not going away.

Eh. I haven’t really seen much about it anywhere other than here.

She’s a Democrat. In Montgomery County. Running against an unknown.


I’m not voting for her. She was in the planning board and supports Thrive 2050. No thanks!
She is going to crush Doan.

Anonymous wrote:Obviously any financial issues/liens/debts are fair game if it affects the couple. He is her campaign treasurer too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The twitter replies on this are as you would expect.

If you are a hardcore partisan to the left- this is a gross attack on a veteran family, and nothing more than a conservative hit piece.

If you are on the right- clearly the family has illegally tried to benefit from an exemption that is unearned.

The truth almost certainly lies somewhere in the middle. Her husband was wounded/injured in combat. They have filed the VA claims because of that. Maybe they were turned down. Maybe they are still in process. Maybe they appealed the initial ruling.

Unless I missed something, none of us really know.

She should make a statement and tell us what the status of the claim is.

The truth is, even if they *did* falsely claim the benefit- she will win easily anyway.

Her husband has a history of financial mismanagement. He’s been sued in Maryland courts over 10 times for failure to pay debts. Add that context to this situation and it’s hard not to see it as willful shenanigans.

Awesome! Just what the County Council needs more of. Members who are bad at money management.

Her husband is not on the council.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

30 + 30 + 20 + 30 = 110%. Case closed.

The way VA combines multiple disabilities is more complicated than just adding them up. 30+30+30+20 is a 70% combined rating.

https://www.va.gov/disability/about-disability-ratings/

Which still doesn’t get her husband to a 100% rating. There’s no “close enough” here.

It’s self evident that if he had a 100% rating he would not have bothered to appeal.

He had 100%, they changed it to 30% then he appealed

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

30 + 30 + 20 + 30 = 110%. Case closed.

The way VA combines multiple disabilities is more complicated than just adding them up. 30+30+30+20 is a 70% combined rating.

https://www.va.gov/disability/about-disability-ratings/

Which still doesn’t get her husband to a 100% rating. There’s no “close enough” here.

It’s self evident that if he had a 100% rating he would not have bothered to appeal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The twitter replies on this are as you would expect.

If you are a hardcore partisan to the left- this is a gross attack on a veteran family, and nothing more than a conservative hit piece.

If you are on the right- clearly the family has illegally tried to benefit from an exemption that is unearned.

The truth almost certainly lies somewhere in the middle. Her husband was wounded/injured in combat. They have filed the VA claims because of that. Maybe they were turned down. Maybe they are still in process. Maybe they appealed the initial ruling.

Unless I missed something, none of us really know.

She should make a statement and tell us what the status of the claim is.

The truth is, even if they *did* falsely claim the benefit- she will win easily anyway.

Her husband has a history of financial mismanagement. He’s been sued in Maryland courts over 10 times for failure to pay debts. Add that context to this situation and it’s hard not to see it as willful shenanigans.

Awesome! Just what the County Council needs more of. Members who are bad at money management.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which approach works better?

Wes Moore: My water bill? My bad. It was an oversight and I am correcting it.

Natali Fani-Gonzalez: My property taxes? You have no right to attack me and even though I seek public office, I owe no disclosure obligations to anyone. These are ableist attacks on how my family received benefits that public records indicate I should not be entitled are are disgusting and shameful.

Wow. This story is not going away.

Eh. I haven’t really seen much about it anywhere other than here.

She’s a Democrat. In Montgomery County. Running against an unknown.

She is going to crush Doan.

Talk about missing the point. The issue is that we’re stuck with someone who has questionable decision making, at best and is thin skinned about transparency. These are bad things for an elected official. Montgomery County is screwed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

30 + 30 + 20 + 30 = 110%. Case closed.

The way VA combines multiple disabilities is more complicated than just adding them up. 30+30+30+20 is a 70% combined rating.

https://www.va.gov/disability/about-disability-ratings/

Which still doesn’t get her husband to a 100% rating. There’s no “close enough” here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which approach works better?

Wes Moore: My water bill? My bad. It was an oversight and I am correcting it.

Natali Fani-Gonzalez: My property taxes? You have no right to attack me and even though I seek public office, I owe no disclosure obligations to anyone. These are ableist attacks on how my family received benefits that public records indicate I should not be entitled are are disgusting and shameful.

Wow. This story is not going away.

Eh. I haven’t really seen much about it anywhere other than here.

She’s a Democrat. In Montgomery County. Running against an unknown.

She is going to crush Doan.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The twitter replies on this are as you would expect.

If you are a hardcore partisan to the left- this is a gross attack on a veteran family, and nothing more than a conservative hit piece.

If you are on the right- clearly the family has illegally tried to benefit from an exemption that is unearned.

The truth almost certainly lies somewhere in the middle. Her husband was wounded/injured in combat. They have filed the VA claims because of that. Maybe they were turned down. Maybe they are still in process. Maybe they appealed the initial ruling.

Unless I missed something, none of us really know.

She should make a statement and tell us what the status of the claim is.

The truth is, even if they *did* falsely claim the benefit- she will win easily anyway.

Her husband has a history of financial mismanagement. He’s been sued in Maryland courts over 10 times for failure to pay debts. Add that context to this situation and it’s hard not to see it as willful shenanigans.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which approach works better?

Wes Moore: My water bill? My bad. It was an oversight and I am correcting it.

Natali Fani-Gonzalez: My property taxes? You have no right to attack me and even though I seek public office, I owe no disclosure obligations to anyone. These are ableist attacks on how my family received benefits that public records indicate I should not be entitled are are disgusting and shameful.

Wow. This story is not going away.

Anonymous wrote:

30 + 30 + 20 + 30 = 110%. Case closed.

The way VA combines multiple disabilities is more complicated than just adding them up. 30+30+30+20 is a 70% combined rating.

https://www.va.gov/disability/about-disability-ratings/

Anonymous wrote:This is not self-reporting. You are wrong on this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This court doc talks about one part of the body, the shoulder. You don't have the full picture of his medical history to see what else is happening. The State/County would have immediately removed his property tax exemption if the Vet did not longer qualified. This vet still shows that he has the exemption as he is 100% disabled. My son is disabled and I pray for him every day that he won't deal with people like you all, always judging without knowing facts. Stop and think what's happening here. I can't imagine how her husband must be feeling; attacking his wife due to his disability and the fact that he used his EARNED benefit to protect his family.


What a gross group of people. I'm done here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She did already. She tweeted: "It is appalling to be attacking Veteran families, especially after the corresponding agency has verified the legitimacy of the earned benefits bestowed by the State."

Anonymous wrote:If its a false accusation, than just say that right?

A tweet, a press release, whatever.

"Our home is in 100% good standing on taxes and we have not received any benefits that are not earned and in good standing"

Than its pure egg in the face of the accuser, and the whole thing is put to bed.

Then it seems the ball is in the court of the accuser to put up or shut up. Or indeed this is much adieu about nothing.

Just like the Homestead Exemption, the rules for the Veterans Disability Exemption are clear. The VA has determined that her husband does not have a 100% disability and this was confirmed on appeal. At minimum she should not receive the exemption from the date of the appellate opinion and because the appeal confirms the judgement of the 30% disability in 2020, between 2020-2022 there should have been no award of benefits either due to eligibility.

Saying the “corresponding agency has confirmed…” is total nonsense and deflection from the facts at issue.

None of the things you have posted are accurate. First, the appeals court opinion does not only talk about the shoulder (hint: you need to read the footnotes in legal documents). Second, there is not automatic mechanism by which the VA transmits this information to the state and the county. Like the Homestead Exemption and in fact all other taxes, it requires self-reporting.

Anonymous wrote:My boyfriend is a producer for a local outlet. The county has an office that deals with property taxes and he was able to confirm that there is no investigation going on and that the property tax exception is accurate. End of story.