Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A number of years ago, when my 8th grader went to the local HS for Alg 2 there were seven 8th graders in the class. Only 2 got into Blair. 2 got into RMIB. So clearly non of these programs only take the TOP kids, because these kids were the top math kids in the cluster and most didn't get it in.
I would say four out of seven students being admitted to highly-competitive magnet programs is quite impressive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are also kids who are very good at math (but perhaps not the top) but maybe they are better at Science. Same goes for Computer Science. And Blair’s English is still
higher than every other program too, so they do look at the whole picture. Of course they try to take most of the TOP math kids, but there are at least 2 levels of 9th grade magnet math. And a few will be in math with 10th graders probably, because Those are truly the top math kids.
Ok, so my kids best subject is computer science. How does the selection committee get to taste his abilities on this when they only have MAP-M and grades in math and science to go on?
DP. Now you understand why MCPS is broken.
Cogat (the race-neutral, nationally-administered) exam is gone.
MAP-M primarily indicates what grade level of math the child is doing (and the test score most likely influenced by after-hours tutoring).
Is an A at TPMS the same as an A at Forest Oak?
The only other selection factor is what is written in the application. I would list whatever computer science the child does and have your kid write what they like about CS.
The PP is mostly uninformed. Most of the kids who were getting in had prepped for the CogAT. Yes, that's a thing and it made the scores unreliable since non-gifted who had spent months practicing presented as gifted. There are a lot of bitter people who are pushing bad information. The real problem isn't selection but the scarcity of these programs. THe one thing the MS lottery demonstrated is that far more kids are capable of doing the work than had been previously believed.
Anonymous wrote:A number of years ago, when my 8th grader went to the local HS for Alg 2 there were seven 8th graders in the class. Only 2 got into Blair. 2 got into RMIB. So clearly non of these programs only take the TOP kids, because these kids were the top math kids in the cluster and most didn't get it in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are also kids who are very good at math (but perhaps not the top) but maybe they are better at Science. Same goes for Computer Science. And Blair’s English is still
higher than every other program too, so they do look at the whole picture. Of course they try to take most of the TOP math kids, but there are at least 2 levels of 9th grade magnet math. And a few will be in math with 10th graders probably, because Those are truly the top math kids.
Ok, so my kids best subject is computer science. How does the selection committee get to taste his abilities on this when they only have MAP-M and grades in math and science to go on?
DP. Now you understand why MCPS is broken.
Cogat (the race-neutral, nationally-administered) exam is gone.
MAP-M primarily indicates what grade level of math the child is doing (and the test score most likely influenced by after-hours tutoring).
Is an A at TPMS the same as an A at Forest Oak?
The only other selection factor is what is written in the application. I would list whatever computer science the child does and have your kid write what they like about CS.
The PP is mostly uninformed. Most of the kids who were getting in had prepped for the CogAT. Yes, that's a thing and it made the scores unreliable since non-gifted who had spent months practicing presented as gifted. There are a lot of bitter people who are pushing bad information. The real problem isn't selection but the scarcity of these programs. THe one thing the MS lottery demonstrated is that far more kids are capable of doing the work than had been previously believed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are also kids who are very good at math (but perhaps not the top) but maybe they are better at Science. Same goes for Computer Science. And Blair’s English is still
higher than every other program too, so they do look at the whole picture. Of course they try to take most of the TOP math kids, but there are at least 2 levels of 9th grade magnet math. And a few will be in math with 10th graders probably, because Those are truly the top math kids.
Ok, so my kids best subject is computer science. How does the selection committee get to taste his abilities on this when they only have MAP-M and grades in math and science to go on?
DP. Now you understand why MCPS is broken.
Cogat (the race-neutral, nationally-administered) exam is gone.
MAP-M primarily indicates what grade level of math the child is doing (and the test score most likely influenced by after-hours tutoring).
Is an A at TPMS the same as an A at Forest Oak?
The only other selection factor is what is written in the application. I would list whatever computer science the child does and have your kid write what they like about CS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are also kids who are very good at math (but perhaps not the top) but maybe they are better at Science. Same goes for Computer Science. And Blair’s English is still
higher than every other program too, so they do look at the whole picture. Of course they try to take most of the TOP math kids, but there are at least 2 levels of 9th grade magnet math. And a few will be in math with 10th graders probably, because Those are truly the top math kids.
Ok, so my kids best subject is computer science. How does the selection committee get to taste his abilities on this when they only have MAP-M and grades in math and science to go on?
Anonymous wrote:Rate!!! Rate his abilities, not taste them!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does your comp sci kid enter competitions, write programs, that kind of thing. Does your science kid enter the MoCo sci Fair? Enter competitions.
What about introverted kid who aren’t in to that type of competition? Seriously, that’s not a gauge of ability it’ss gauge of pushy parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Does your comp sci kid enter competitions, write programs, that kind of thing. Does your science kid enter the MoCo sci Fair? Enter competitions.
Anonymous wrote:There are also kids who are very good at math (but perhaps not the top) but maybe they are better at Science. Same goes for Computer Science. And Blair’s English is still
higher than every other program too, so they do look at the whole picture. Of course they try to take most of the TOP math kids, but there are at least 2 levels of 9th grade magnet math. And a few will be in math with 10th graders probably, because Those are truly the top math kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are also kids who are very good at math (but perhaps not the top) but maybe they are better at Science. Same goes for Computer Science. And Blair’s English is still
higher than every other program too, so they do look at the whole picture. Of course they try to take most of the TOP math kids, but there are at least 2 levels of 9th grade magnet math. And a few will be in math with 10th graders probably, because Those are truly the top math kids.
Ok, so my kids best subject is computer science. How does the selection committee get to taste his abilities on this when they only have MAP-M and grades in math and science to go on?