Anonymous wrote:The scenery and nightlife are probably closer to what people think of as San Bernardino than what people think of as LA (beaches, downtown, Hollywood, etc).
I don't understand the point of these sweeping generalizations. Most people in LA County don't live near the beaches, Hollywood, or Downtown. The county overall is extremely complex and diverse in landscape. San Bernardino County is similarly difficult to characterize as it hosts some of the wealthiest communities in SoCal as well as some of the poorest and underserved.
Claremont is simply its own place as a town dominated by colleges. I can't think of any other place nearby with that same emphasis.
The scenery and nightlife are probably closer to what people think of as San Bernardino than what people think of as LA (beaches, downtown, Hollywood, etc).
Anonymous wrote:Don't quite understand the point the person arguing against Claremont being in metro LA is trying to make.
Obviously it's not IN LA proper, but Claremont is literally in Los Angeles county. As such, it is NOT considered part of the Inland Empire (if you want to get technical).
The Los Angeles Times, FWIW, considers the Inland Empire to encompass Riverside and San Bernandino counties....
However, more important than the LA Times, the federal agency that defines national "MSAs" (metropolitan statistical areas) does NOT include Claremont in the Riverside-San Bernandino-Ontario MSA (which most people use to define the Inland Empire), but instead in the Los Angeles MSA.
(as an aside, Amherst is NOT in the Boston MSA)
Anonymous wrote:Don't quite understand the point the person arguing against Claremont being in metro LA is trying to make.
Obviously it's not IN LA proper, but Claremont is literally in Los Angeles county. As such, it is NOT considered part of the Inland Empire (if you want to get technical).
The Los Angeles Times, FWIW, considers the Inland Empire to encompass Riverside and San Bernandino counties....
However, more important than the LA Times, the federal agency that defines national "MSAs" (metropolitan statistical areas) does NOT include Claremont in the Riverside-San Bernandino-Ontario MSA (which most people use to define the Inland Empire), but instead in the Los Angeles MSA.
(as an aside, Amherst is NOT in the Boston MSA)
)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would choose based on where I think I’d be after graduation. Pomona is very well known in the west coast, while Amherst is better known on the east coast. Other than that, I’d choose by climate. For me, it would be Pomona, hands down.
As someone who is LA, keep in mind that the inland empire (where Pomona is) is not Santa Monica. It is very, very hot especially from Aug-Oct and air quality is very poor due to smog, fires, etc. So that is not a better climate for all people. My kid would take Amherst climate (we live on east coast now) over Pomona any day of the week.
But your kid is looking to try something new just like a northeast kid wants to do the same. This goes back to the those of us saying that if this geographic detail is a key factor in school choice - kids won’t be applying to both .
Note - there are plenty of us that understand exactly where Pomona is… there are reasons for a student to still like the school and location despite the fact that doesn’t register on ‘it’ locations among the wealthy in CA.
As my post said, we live on the east coast now (I just grew up in LA). So, no, he isn't looking for something new. And I was using Santa Monica as a point of comparison not because it's an "it" part of LA, but to talk about the climate. The weather on the west side of LA--Santa Monica, Westwood (UCLA), etc. -- is basically beautiful all year. But the inland empire does not have "perfect weather"; it's VERY hot at certain times of the year and the air quality is poor. I think the Pomona schools are lovely and would be fully supportive if my kid was interested. But it's not an LA school, nor is it a suburb of LA (LA doesn't really have "suburbs" the way other cities do). It's the inland empire -- about an hour from LA with no traffic so, in reality, much further. I mean, would you say Athens, GA is a "suburb" of Atlanta?
1) You are replying to someone who also grew up in LA
2) I don't understand why you (and others) feel the need to educate others about Claremont or why you assume the draw to Claremont has anything to do with LA or being on the coast. (And I'm sorry - but Claremont absolutely IS part of Greater LA metro area.) Don't you think that students that are seriously considering this school will visit and see for themselves? Even if they are coming from far away and visit a variety of California schools, applicants will decide for themselves what they like about each school. Nobody visiting schools is going to mistake the differences between Claremont and Westwood. Nor will they mistake differences between a Pepperdine or UCSB to a Pomona or Pitzer.
I just find it odd that there are always so many people who want to weigh in on Pomona's location.
I also spent time living in Massachusetts and personally, I wouldn't ever want to live somewhere as remote as Amherst and with the length of winter compared to the length of school year (the BEST weather is when you are NOT in school). But I don't spend an ounce of energy weighing in on that when people post about schools in the northeast. Because they will find out for themselves and make choices based on their preferences. I don't need to impose mine on something so personal and something people will find out about before attending a school.
I think you miss the point of both this forum and op’s question,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would choose based on where I think I’d be after graduation. Pomona is very well known in the west coast, while Amherst is better known on the east coast. Other than that, I’d choose by climate. For me, it would be Pomona, hands down.
As someone who is LA, keep in mind that the inland empire (where Pomona is) is not Santa Monica. It is very, very hot especially from Aug-Oct and air quality is very poor due to smog, fires, etc. So that is not a better climate for all people. My kid would take Amherst climate (we live on east coast now) over Pomona any day of the week.
But your kid is looking to try something new just like a northeast kid wants to do the same. This goes back to the those of us saying that if this geographic detail is a key factor in school choice - kids won’t be applying to both .
Note - there are plenty of us that understand exactly where Pomona is… there are reasons for a student to still like the school and location despite the fact that doesn’t register on ‘it’ locations among the wealthy in CA.
As my post said, we live on the east coast now (I just grew up in LA). So, no, he isn't looking for something new. And I was using Santa Monica as a point of comparison not because it's an "it" part of LA, but to talk about the climate. The weather on the west side of LA--Santa Monica, Westwood (UCLA), etc. -- is basically beautiful all year. But the inland empire does not have "perfect weather"; it's VERY hot at certain times of the year and the air quality is poor. I think the Pomona schools are lovely and would be fully supportive if my kid was interested. But it's not an LA school, nor is it a suburb of LA (LA doesn't really have "suburbs" the way other cities do). It's the inland empire -- about an hour from LA with no traffic so, in reality, much further. I mean, would you say Athens, GA is a "suburb" of Atlanta?
Claremont is 35 miles from downtown LA and is considered part of greater LA economically and geographically
Athens is over 70 miles from Atlanta is is not considered part of greater Atlanta on either dimension.
Again - I don't see anyone here "educating" people who want to ask about UGA and how it is not part of Atlanta or how rural it is compared to Atlanta etc.
It's an odd obsession that some LA people have about Claremont and all kinds of weird assumptions on why a student would go there. When we went on tours, we knew people who went to a slew of schools in greater LA. I remember one who loved USC and couldn't fathom the Claremont schools, while another felt the exact opposite. Then there is the USC - UCLA divide....and the lovers of Pepperdine vs UCSB. California is just part of the equation and there are kids who genuinely love each of these schools and some who strongly prefer by location too. Again - such a very strange obsession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would choose based on where I think I’d be after graduation. Pomona is very well known in the west coast, while Amherst is better known on the east coast. Other than that, I’d choose by climate. For me, it would be Pomona, hands down.
As someone who is LA, keep in mind that the inland empire (where Pomona is) is not Santa Monica. It is very, very hot especially from Aug-Oct and air quality is very poor due to smog, fires, etc. So that is not a better climate for all people. My kid would take Amherst climate (we live on east coast now) over Pomona any day of the week.
But your kid is looking to try something new just like a northeast kid wants to do the same. This goes back to the those of us saying that if this geographic detail is a key factor in school choice - kids won’t be applying to both .
Note - there are plenty of us that understand exactly where Pomona is… there are reasons for a student to still like the school and location despite the fact that doesn’t register on ‘it’ locations among the wealthy in CA.
As my post said, we live on the east coast now (I just grew up in LA). So, no, he isn't looking for something new. And I was using Santa Monica as a point of comparison not because it's an "it" part of LA, but to talk about the climate. The weather on the west side of LA--Santa Monica, Westwood (UCLA), etc. -- is basically beautiful all year. But the inland empire does not have "perfect weather"; it's VERY hot at certain times of the year and the air quality is poor. I think the Pomona schools are lovely and would be fully supportive if my kid was interested. But it's not an LA school, nor is it a suburb of LA (LA doesn't really have "suburbs" the way other cities do). It's the inland empire -- about an hour from LA with no traffic so, in reality, much further. I mean, would you say Athens, GA is a "suburb" of Atlanta?
1) You are replying to someone who also grew up in LA
2) I don't understand why you (and others) feel the need to educate others about Claremont or why you assume the draw to Claremont has anything to do with LA or being on the coast. (And I'm sorry - but Claremont absolutely IS part of Greater LA metro area.) Don't you think that students that are seriously considering this school will visit and see for themselves? Even if they are coming from far away and visit a variety of California schools, applicants will decide for themselves what they like about each school. Nobody visiting schools is going to mistake the differences between Claremont and Westwood. Nor will they mistake differences between a Pepperdine or UCSB to a Pomona or Pitzer.
I just find it odd that there are always so many people who want to weigh in on Pomona's location.
I also spent time living in Massachusetts and personally, I wouldn't ever want to live somewhere as remote as Amherst and with the length of winter compared to the length of school year (the BEST weather is when you are NOT in school). But I don't spend an ounce of energy weighing in on that when people post about schools in the northeast. Because they will find out for themselves and make choices based on their preferences. I don't need to impose mine on something so personal and something people will find out about before attending a school.
I think you miss the point of both this forum and op’s question,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would choose based on where I think I’d be after graduation. Pomona is very well known in the west coast, while Amherst is better known on the east coast. Other than that, I’d choose by climate. For me, it would be Pomona, hands down.
As someone who is LA, keep in mind that the inland empire (where Pomona is) is not Santa Monica. It is very, very hot especially from Aug-Oct and air quality is very poor due to smog, fires, etc. So that is not a better climate for all people. My kid would take Amherst climate (we live on east coast now) over Pomona any day of the week.
But your kid is looking to try something new just like a northeast kid wants to do the same. This goes back to the those of us saying that if this geographic detail is a key factor in school choice - kids won’t be applying to both .
Note - there are plenty of us that understand exactly where Pomona is… there are reasons for a student to still like the school and location despite the fact that doesn’t register on ‘it’ locations among the wealthy in CA.
As my post said, we live on the east coast now (I just grew up in LA). So, no, he isn't looking for something new. And I was using Santa Monica as a point of comparison not because it's an "it" part of LA, but to talk about the climate. The weather on the west side of LA--Santa Monica, Westwood (UCLA), etc. -- is basically beautiful all year. But the inland empire does not have "perfect weather"; it's VERY hot at certain times of the year and the air quality is poor. I think the Pomona schools are lovely and would be fully supportive if my kid was interested. But it's not an LA school, nor is it a suburb of LA (LA doesn't really have "suburbs" the way other cities do). It's the inland empire -- about an hour from LA with no traffic so, in reality, much further. I mean, would you say Athens, GA is a "suburb" of Atlanta?
Claremont is 35 miles from downtown LA and is considered part of greater LA economically and geographically
Athens is over 70 miles from Atlanta is is not considered part of greater Atlanta on either dimension.
Again - I don't see anyone here "educating" people who want to ask about UGA and how it is not part of Atlanta or how rural it is compared to Atlanta etc.
It's an odd obsession that some LA people have about Claremont and all kinds of weird assumptions on why a student would go there. When we went on tours, we knew people who went to a slew of schools in greater LA. I remember one who loved USC and couldn't fathom the Claremont schools, while another felt the exact opposite. Then there is the USC - UCLA divide....and the lovers of Pepperdine vs UCSB. California is just part of the equation and there are kids who genuinely love each of these schools and some who strongly prefer by location too. Again - such a very strange obsession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would choose based on where I think I’d be after graduation. Pomona is very well known in the west coast, while Amherst is better known on the east coast. Other than that, I’d choose by climate. For me, it would be Pomona, hands down.
As someone who is LA, keep in mind that the inland empire (where Pomona is) is not Santa Monica. It is very, very hot especially from Aug-Oct and air quality is very poor due to smog, fires, etc. So that is not a better climate for all people. My kid would take Amherst climate (we live on east coast now) over Pomona any day of the week.
But your kid is looking to try something new just like a northeast kid wants to do the same. This goes back to the those of us saying that if this geographic detail is a key factor in school choice - kids won’t be applying to both .
Note - there are plenty of us that understand exactly where Pomona is… there are reasons for a student to still like the school and location despite the fact that doesn’t register on ‘it’ locations among the wealthy in CA.
As my post said, we live on the east coast now (I just grew up in LA). So, no, he isn't looking for something new. And I was using Santa Monica as a point of comparison not because it's an "it" part of LA, but to talk about the climate. The weather on the west side of LA--Santa Monica, Westwood (UCLA), etc. -- is basically beautiful all year. But the inland empire does not have "perfect weather"; it's VERY hot at certain times of the year and the air quality is poor. I think the Pomona schools are lovely and would be fully supportive if my kid was interested. But it's not an LA school, nor is it a suburb of LA (LA doesn't really have "suburbs" the way other cities do). It's the inland empire -- about an hour from LA with no traffic so, in reality, much further. I mean, would you say Athens, GA is a "suburb" of Atlanta?
1) You are replying to someone who also grew up in LA
2) I don't understand why you (and others) feel the need to educate others about Claremont or why you assume the draw to Claremont has anything to do with LA or being on the coast. (And I'm sorry - but Claremont absolutely IS part of Greater LA metro area.) Don't you think that students that are seriously considering this school will visit and see for themselves? Even if they are coming from far away and visit a variety of California schools, applicants will decide for themselves what they like about each school. Nobody visiting schools is going to mistake the differences between Claremont and Westwood. Nor will they mistake differences between a Pepperdine or UCSB to a Pomona or Pitzer.
I just find it odd that there are always so many people who want to weigh in on Pomona's location.
I also spent time living in Massachusetts and personally, I wouldn't ever want to live somewhere as remote as Amherst and with the length of winter compared to the length of school year (the BEST weather is when you are NOT in school). But I don't spend an ounce of energy weighing in on that when people post about schools in the northeast. Because they will find out for themselves and make choices based on their preferences. I don't need to impose mine on something so personal and something people will find out about before attending a school.