Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I ride a bike and drive a car. I have no problem with holding bikers and motorists to the same obligations to obey all traffic signs regardless if on a bike or a car. That makes both safer. How can anyone argue that it is safer for bikers to be able to run stop signs? Again, love cycling but this is just common sense to me.

Generally, if you can just proceed through the intersection as soon as you verify that it is clear, that is better for bikes, instead of stopping fully. Bikes and cars are totally different vehicles.

Ok then why do we share a road? Why do I have to creep behind the Little Engine that Could if we are different vehicles with different capabilities.

And I see how its better to slow down than make a full stop....but tell that to all the bikers that I almost hit when I have the right of way, use my turn signal and safely proceed and they run through a stop sign. Share the road, share the rules.

The same reason a Prius and a turbocharged F-350 share a road?

Nice try, but a Prius and F-350 can both keep traffic moving at 25mph.

You don't have a right to go 25mph. You want to and don't care about other people. You probably also sit in traffic complaining about too many cars on the road.

So say its a one lane road with a 30mph limit, you think its ok to bike at.....15mph?....and slow down everyone behind you...and then roll through that stop sign. Talk about entitlement.....

Do you know what a speed limit is? Because the 30 MPH you are referring to is a limit, not a floor. Are you aware of any minimum speeds on any roads that aren't interstate highways? Please do let me know when you find one.

You guys can high five each other all you want in pointing out the obvious difference between a limit and a floor or the lack of minimum speed limits....the point is that bikes slow down traffic on streets that were built for cars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bike lobby is awful in Alexandria: rude, aggressive, bullying, and they lie (they bring in people who live and work somewhere else to meetings, sign petitions etc to get things changed in Alexandria). The head of BPAC had his blind cyclist friends contact the city to request the crosswalk on Seminary that goes in front of the BPAC member’s house, claiming they needed the crosswalk to cross safely.

Talk about the ultimate special interest.

Oh, how terrible, a crosswalk.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Question: does anyone know how many cars drive in DC and how many bikes ride in DC on an average daily basis?

Looking for an objective answer here not "well if we had bike lanes there would be more bikes " or "if we forced bikers to register, we would know the answer"

“I want to ask a question, but don’t care about any of the context surrounding the answer”

Anonymous wrote:Question: does anyone know how many cars drive in DC and how many bikes ride in DC on an average daily basis?

Looking for an objective answer here not "well if we had bike lanes there would be more bikes " or "if we forced bikers to register, we would know the answer"

Anonymous wrote:Question: does anyone know how many cars drive in DC and how many bikes ride in DC on an average daily basis?

Looking for an objective answer here not "well if we had bike lanes there would be more bikes " or "if we forced bikers to register, we would know the answer"

Anonymous wrote:Question: does anyone know how many cars drive in DC and how many bikes ride in DC on an average daily basis?

Looking for an objective answer here not "well if we had bike lanes there would be more bikes " or "if we forced bikers to register, we would know the answer"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You guys can high five each other all you want in pointing out the obvious difference between a limit and a floor or the lack of minimum speed limits....the point is that bikes slow down traffic on streets that were built for cars.

Thank you for demonstrating your actual position here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I ride a bike and drive a car. I have no problem with holding bikers and motorists to the same obligations to obey all traffic signs regardless if on a bike or a car. That makes both safer. How can anyone argue that it is safer for bikers to be able to run stop signs? Again, love cycling but this is just common sense to me.

Generally, if you can just proceed through the intersection as soon as you verify that it is clear, that is better for bikes, instead of stopping fully. Bikes and cars are totally different vehicles.

Ok then why do we share a road? Why do I have to creep behind the Little Engine that Could if we are different vehicles with different capabilities.

And I see how its better to slow down than make a full stop....but tell that to all the bikers that I almost hit when I have the right of way, use my turn signal and safely proceed and they run through a stop sign. Share the road, share the rules.

The same reason a Prius and a turbocharged F-350 share a road?

Nice try, but a Prius and F-350 can both keep traffic moving at 25mph.

You don't have a right to go 25mph. You want to and don't care about other people. You probably also sit in traffic complaining about too many cars on the road.

So say its a one lane road with a 30mph limit, you think its ok to bike at.....15mph?....and slow down everyone behind you...and then roll through that stop sign. Talk about entitlement.....

Do you know what a speed limit is? Because the 30 MPH you are referring to is a limit, not a floor. Are you aware of any minimum speeds on any roads that aren't interstate highways? Please do let me know when you find one.

You guys can high five each other all you want in pointing out the obvious difference between a limit and a floor or the lack of minimum speed limits....the point is that bikes slow down traffic on streets that were built for cars.

Anonymous wrote:The only way I would ride a bike is in protected lanes. A colleague was doored and paralyzed for life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I ride a bike and drive a car. I have no problem with holding bikers and motorists to the same obligations to obey all traffic signs regardless if on a bike or a car. That makes both safer. How can anyone argue that it is safer for bikers to be able to run stop signs? Again, love cycling but this is just common sense to me.

Generally, if you can just proceed through the intersection as soon as you verify that it is clear, that is better for bikes, instead of stopping fully. Bikes and cars are totally different vehicles.

Ok then why do we share a road? Why do I have to creep behind the Little Engine that Could if we are different vehicles with different capabilities.

And I see how its better to slow down than make a full stop....but tell that to all the bikers that I almost hit when I have the right of way, use my turn signal and safely proceed and they run through a stop sign. Share the road, share the rules.

The same reason a Prius and a turbocharged F-350 share a road?

Nice try, but a Prius and F-350 can both keep traffic moving at 25mph.

You don't have a right to go 25mph. You want to and don't care about other people. You probably also sit in traffic complaining about too many cars on the road.

So say its a one lane road with a 30mph limit, you think its ok to bike at.....15mph?....and slow down everyone behind you...and then roll through that stop sign. Talk about entitlement.....

Do you know what a speed limit is? Because the 30 MPH you are referring to is a limit, not a floor. Are you aware of any minimum speeds on any roads that aren't interstate highways? Please do let me know when you find one.

You guys can high five each other all you want in pointing out the obvious difference between a limit and a floor or the lack of minimum speed limits....the point is that bikes slow down traffic on streets that were built for cars.

Thank you for demonstrating your actual position here.

You're welcome hon! Now let me know when you want to talk about both biker and driver safety, liability, use of roads with availability of bike lanes and the enormous cost to taxpayers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I ride a bike and drive a car. I have no problem with holding bikers and motorists to the same obligations to obey all traffic signs regardless if on a bike or a car. That makes both safer. How can anyone argue that it is safer for bikers to be able to run stop signs? Again, love cycling but this is just common sense to me.

Generally, if you can just proceed through the intersection as soon as you verify that it is clear, that is better for bikes, instead of stopping fully. Bikes and cars are totally different vehicles.

Ok then why do we share a road? Why do I have to creep behind the Little Engine that Could if we are different vehicles with different capabilities.

And I see how its better to slow down than make a full stop....but tell that to all the bikers that I almost hit when I have the right of way, use my turn signal and safely proceed and they run through a stop sign. Share the road, share the rules.

The same reason a Prius and a turbocharged F-350 share a road?

Nice try, but a Prius and F-350 can both keep traffic moving at 25mph.

You don't have a right to go 25mph. You want to and don't care about other people. You probably also sit in traffic complaining about too many cars on the road.

So say its a one lane road with a 30mph limit, you think its ok to bike at.....15mph?....and slow down everyone behind you...and then roll through that stop sign. Talk about entitlement.....

Do you know what a speed limit is? Because the 30 MPH you are referring to is a limit, not a floor. Are you aware of any minimum speeds on any roads that aren't interstate highways? Please do let me know when you find one.

You guys can high five each other all you want in pointing out the obvious difference between a limit and a floor or the lack of minimum speed limits....the point is that bikes slow down traffic on streets that were built for cars.

Thank you for demonstrating your actual position here.