Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was definitely a lot more salacious than it needed to be. Honestly, she didn’t need to share the gritty details about searching his house and the prescriptions to be broadcast to tens of thousands of people. Those poor kids constantly having to relive things and suffering because neither of their parents can/could keep their mouths shut on public mediums. It didn’t even seem pertinent in relation to “survival”. What did she survive? The only reason she’s where she’s at now is because he died. Where’s the lesson in that? And she completely glossed over her addiction and the cause of her second divorce in favor of trashing her kids’ father under the guise of divorce/relationship advice. So unnecessary and disappointing. And Sarah really sucks as an interviewer.
That is 100% false. She went to rehab. She got clean. She's stayed clean. All of that takes personal strength. She got to this point in her life by working a program and staying clean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Natasha, if you’re reading this - good for you. I think sharing your story was the right move. You were part of a very public marriage/divorce/death. If people don’t hear details directly from the source, they speculate. I enjoyed listening to the podcast. I think the girls will be okay with lots of therapy and surrounded by consistent, warm, loving people (Natasha, grandparents? Nanny? Private school communities?)
She didn’t share “her story”. In addition to talking about Kane, her story would have involved also sharing the laundry list of pills that could have been found in her house, the dangerous or erratic behavior she exposed her kids to, the underhanded things she did in the custody fight. All she shared was her version of kanes story. Which cool cash in on that if that’s worth the trauma to your daughters to you, but this in one way Natasha’s life story or the details of her struggles and overcoming things
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what happened with her second husband. Wish they had discussed that.
Anonymous wrote:It was definitely a lot more salacious than it needed to be. Honestly, she didn’t need to share the gritty details about searching his house and the prescriptions to be broadcast to tens of thousands of people. Those poor kids constantly having to relive things and suffering because neither of their parents can/could keep their mouths shut on public mediums. It didn’t even seem pertinent in relation to “survival”. What did she survive? The only reason she’s where she’s at now is because he died. Where’s the lesson in that? And she completely glossed over her addiction and the cause of her second divorce in favor of trashing her kids’ father under the guise of divorce/relationship advice. So unnecessary and disappointing. And Sarah really sucks as an interviewer.
Anonymous wrote:She really brushes over her own stuff. The story could as easily be an addict mom runs away with the kids. She’s talking so much about his instability (and I believe a lot of that) but doesn’t own why he may also have had valid reasons to be furious with her / paranoid about her ability to care for the kids etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do you get a ketamine prescription. I thought it had to be administered by a doctor.
This is exactly what she was saying. It's only supposed to be administered in an inpatient setting. Peter's psychologist prescribed it for at home use. Along with a lot of other meds.
Anonymous wrote:It was definitely a lot more salacious than it needed to be. Honestly, she didn’t need to share the gritty details about searching his house and the prescriptions to be broadcast to tens of thousands of people. Those poor kids constantly having to relive things and suffering because neither of their parents can/could keep their mouths shut on public mediums. It didn’t even seem pertinent in relation to “survival”. What did she survive? The only reason she’s where she’s at now is because he died. Where’s the lesson in that? And she completely glossed over her addiction and the cause of her second divorce in favor of trashing her kids’ father under the guise of divorce/relationship advice. So unnecessary and disappointing. And Sarah really sucks as an interviewer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what happened with her second husband. Wish they had discussed that.
Their divorce might still be ongoing. She just said that what she had to deal with related to Kane impacted the relationship with the second husband. Could br something like, he didn’t sign on to be a FT step parent to two very traumatized girls.
Anonymous wrote:I'm curious what happened with her second husband. Wish they had discussed that.
Anonymous wrote:Natasha, if you’re reading this - good for you. I think sharing your story was the right move. You were part of a very public marriage/divorce/death. If people don’t hear details directly from the source, they speculate. I enjoyed listening to the podcast. I think the girls will be okay with lots of therapy and surrounded by consistent, warm, loving people (Natasha, grandparents? Nanny? Private school communities?)
Anonymous wrote:She was more than fair to him. Kane and his sleazy lawyers lied about his condition and whereabouts, and lied about him having custody of the kids, even after he was dead and gone. They more or less insinuated that he passed of natural causes or a freak accident, and was the loving, perfect parent of the two of them until his untimely death.