Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of you have a short memory, but opposition to the Nats Stadium giveaway is the issue that propelled Fenty to the Mayor's office.
Someone will step up to make hay of this and perhaps rid us of Bowser once and for all.
And then Fenty, who also opposed the school takeover before becoming mayor, also embraced the stadium.
The fact is, the stadium as been a huge financial success and the bonds will be paid off years in advance.
Properly accounted for, stadiums are a huge waste of public resources. This has been demonstrated time and time again. Stop shilling for billionaires.
Only the lowest of low information voters aren’t aware of the facts on this by now, but there are so many of them.
It’s even worse here when the teams can play three jurisdictions off one another. I’ve reached the point where im almost excited to see how badly DC gets swindled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of you have a short memory, but opposition to the Nats Stadium giveaway is the issue that propelled Fenty to the Mayor's office.
Someone will step up to make hay of this and perhaps rid us of Bowser once and for all.
And then Fenty, who also opposed the school takeover before becoming mayor, also embraced the stadium.
The fact is, the stadium as been a huge financial success and the bonds will be paid off years in advance.
Properly accounted for, stadiums are a huge waste of public resources. This has been demonstrated time and time again. Stop shilling for billionaires.
Anonymous wrote:City will have to pay for infrastructure either way. If the owners commit to funding the stadium and it is a compact, urban stadium, then I would be ok with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of you have a short memory, but opposition to the Nats Stadium giveaway is the issue that propelled Fenty to the Mayor's office.
Someone will step up to make hay of this and perhaps rid us of Bowser once and for all.
And then Fenty, who also opposed the school takeover before becoming mayor, also embraced the stadium.
The fact is, the stadium as been a huge financial success and the bonds will be paid off years in advance.
Anonymous wrote:Many of you have a short memory, but opposition to the Nats Stadium giveaway is the issue that propelled Fenty to the Mayor's office.
Someone will step up to make hay of this and perhaps rid us of Bowser once and for all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the PP’s rumor about the team moving to Richmond were to come to fruition, would that bring Balmer and DC closer together like when the Os had the sole local area team market for MLB?
It’s a shame the RFK stadium is not maximized to its fullest potential. It could be a Part-time youth sports plex.
The DC TV market has 2.5 million households. The Richmond, VA TV market has 600k households. You do the math. They are not moving to Richmond. They were however on course for a move to NOVA until Dan Snyder screwed it up being a greedy liar. I would expect that a NOVA move will still happen but it will take a little more time to negotiate. I suspect the choice is basically Fairfax or Loudon with subsidy or Dumfries with no subsidy.
I don’t want them anywhere near Fairfax. I hope that groups are forming to fight this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the PP’s rumor about the team moving to Richmond were to come to fruition, would that bring Balmer and DC closer together like when the Os had the sole local area team market for MLB?
It’s a shame the RFK stadium is not maximized to its fullest potential. It could be a Part-time youth sports plex.
The DC TV market has 2.5 million households. The Richmond, VA TV market has 600k households. You do the math. They are not moving to Richmond. They were however on course for a move to NOVA until Dan Snyder screwed it up being a greedy liar. I would expect that a NOVA move will still happen but it will take a little more time to negotiate. I suspect the choice is basically Fairfax or Loudon with subsidy or Dumfries with no subsidy.
Anonymous wrote:Many of you have a short memory, but opposition to the Nats Stadium giveaway is the issue that propelled Fenty to the Mayor's office.
Someone will step up to make hay of this and perhaps rid us of Bowser once and for all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Colossal waste of a urban space that will sit empty 330 days a year or more. I know our idiot leaders will fall for the grift just like so many cities have before, but it doesn't mean I have to like it.
They’re going to have to fall for it because RTO has fizzled and the District needs the income.
The stadium will cost the city money, not provide income. They will be on the hook for infrastructure bonds and improvements even if the team nominally funds the stadium and most teams get a very large cut of the tax revenue generated by the stadium as part of their deal
It’s a done deal. There’s bipartisan support. Move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No way is it a done deal considering everything that would have to come together
It is a done deal.
Anonymous wrote:I live in the neighborhood and I'd LOVE the Commanders back in RFK. Would jazz up that part of Capitol Hill a lot.
I do hope that they encourage metro and leave space to keep the RFK playing fields and bike/ped access to the trails. Anonymous wrote:No way is it a done deal considering everything that would have to come together