Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only natives to this country are the indigenous peoples. Which makes white supremacy in this country all the more laughable.
Nah. The indigenous people all came from somewhere else, mostly from Asia. And those people originally came from somewhere else too.
By your definition, no one is native once you get away from the people living in southern Africa.
+1. Native Americans didn't spontaneously spring from the ground in America.
But when does being Native American include those not indigenous to America or the first to arrive?
Anonymous wrote:It was created as a national holiday to piss off the anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic conservatives. Basically, it was a middle finger to the Protestant KKK and WASPs.
Anonymous wrote:Are English native to "England"?
History says Anglo- Saxons were invaders.
Are Turks native to Turkiye? They did drive the Greeks out of Anatolia?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren’t people native to the place where they were born?
Not necessarily.
Most in the U.S. are occupiers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren’t people native to the place where they were born?
Not necessarily.
Most in the U.S. are occupiers.
+1
It depends on how you define native, of course. But since there are "Native Americans," it's weird to call yourself "native to America." I think people usually say "first generation immigrant" or "born the USA" or something like that if they want to say they were born in the US.
There are American Indians or more properly, the specific tribe. Of course most Americans are native to the U.S. Where else would we be native to?
Most “Americans” are occupiers, living on stolen land.
Which is a good not bad thing. If you can't defend your land, you lose it. Natives took land from each other all the time. No utopia before Europeans. And indeed their ancestors came from Asia and stole the land first.
Spoken like a true ultra-MAGA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren’t people native to the place where they were born?
Not necessarily.
Most in the U.S. are occupiers.
+1
It depends on how you define native, of course. But since there are "Native Americans," it's weird to call yourself "native to America." I think people usually say "first generation immigrant" or "born the USA" or something like that if they want to say they were born in the US.
There are American Indians or more properly, the specific tribe. Of course most Americans are native to the U.S. Where else would we be native to?
Most “Americans” are occupiers, living on stolen land.
Which is a good not bad thing. If you can't defend your land, you lose it. Natives took land from each other all the time. No utopia before Europeans. And indeed their ancestors came from Asia and stole the land first.
So we should spend all our time defending our little plot of land? That would spell progress to you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is something only a white person would think of...
#LandBack
LANDBACK is a movement that has existed for generations with a long legacy of organizing and sacrifice to get Indigenous Lands back into Indigenous hands. Currently, there are LANDBACK battles being fought all across Turtle Island, to the north and the South.
As NDN Collective, we are stepping into this legacy with the launch of a LANDBACK Campaign as a mechanism to connect, coordinate, resource and amplify this movement and the communities that are fighting for LANDBACK. The closure of Mount Rushmore, return of that land and all public lands in the Black Hills, South Dakota is our cornerstone battle, from which we will build out this campaign. Not only does Mount Rushmore sit in the heart of the sacred Black Hills, but it is an international symbol of white supremacy and colonization. To truly dismantle white supremacy and systems of oppression, we have to go back to the roots. Which, for us, is putting Indigneous Lands back in Indigenous hands.
In addition, LANDBACK is more than just a campaign. It is a political framework that allows us to deepen our relationships across the field of organizing movements working towards true collective liberation. It allows us to envision a world where Black, Indigenous & POC liberation co-exists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it so embarrassing that Columbus Day is still celebrated. It should banned entirely.
Every time this comes up, it's a slippery slope to then erasing any and all traces of western European exploration and settlement.
America is named after a European explorer. Whether does it end?
I can’t tell if this is sarcasm.
Any and all traces of European exploration are visible by looking at all of us white people living here.
Right? Also, Columbus was a terrible person, even by the standards of his own time. He was so brutal that some of his contemporaries complained to the Crown. Not really someone we should emulate. We don't need to celebrate him personally to acknowledge the very obvious fact that Europeans colonized the Americas.
If you think Columbus Day is about emulating Columbus, no wonder you want to cancel it...
If Columbus Day is not about celebrating Columbus, what IS it about? And if it's not about celebrating Columbus, maybe we could call it something else, so that it gets out from under his unpleasant legacy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it so embarrassing that Columbus Day is still celebrated. It should banned entirely.
Every time this comes up, it's a slippery slope to then erasing any and all traces of western European exploration and settlement.
America is named after a European explorer. Whether does it end?
I can’t tell if this is sarcasm.
Any and all traces of European exploration are visible by looking at all of us white people living here.
Right? Also, Columbus was a terrible person, even by the standards of his own time. He was so brutal that some of his contemporaries complained to the Crown. Not really someone we should emulate. We don't need to celebrate him personally to acknowledge the very obvious fact that Europeans colonized the Americas.
If you think Columbus Day is about emulating Columbus, no wonder you want to cancel it...
If Columbus Day is not about celebrating Columbus, what IS it about? And if it's not about celebrating Columbus, maybe we could call it something else, so that it gets out from under his unpleasant legacy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only natives to this country are the indigenous peoples. Which makes white supremacy in this country all the more laughable.
Nah. The indigenous people all came from somewhere else, mostly from Asia. And those people originally came from somewhere else too.
By your definition, no one is native once you get away from the people living in southern Africa.
+1. Native Americans didn't spontaneously spring from the ground in America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it so embarrassing that Columbus Day is still celebrated. It should banned entirely.
Every time this comes up, it's a slippery slope to then erasing any and all traces of western European exploration and settlement.
America is named after a European explorer. Whether does it end?
I can’t tell if this is sarcasm.
Any and all traces of European exploration are visible by looking at all of us white people living here.
Right? Also, Columbus was a terrible person, even by the standards of his own time. He was so brutal that some of his contemporaries complained to the Crown. Not really someone we should emulate. We don't need to celebrate him personally to acknowledge the very obvious fact that Europeans colonized the Americas.
If you think Columbus Day is about emulating Columbus, no wonder you want to cancel it...