Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
And, out comes the UVA troll…
Uva is really good at the easy subjects. Sucks at the rigorous stuff.
Odd. Berkeley has only 18 Rhodes Scholars. UVA has 56.
Odd. Berkeley has only 18 Rhodes Scholars. UVA has 56.
Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe anyone is trying to compare UCB to UVA in academics. UCB is easily a top ten university worldwide. UVA isn’t even top 100.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
And, out comes the UVA troll…
Uva is really good at the easy subjects. Sucks at the rigorous stuff.
Odd. Berkeley has only 18 Rhodes Scholars. UVA has 56.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
And, out comes the UVA troll…
Uva is really good at the easy subjects. Sucks at the rigorous stuff.
Odd. Berkeley has only 18 Rhodes Scholars. UVA has 56.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
And, out comes the UVA troll…
Uva is really good at the easy subjects. Sucks at the rigorous stuff.
Anonymous wrote:This is bs. No Georgia Tech, Berkeley, or Michigan? They have elite engineering schools. And some of those LACs and privates have rampant grade inflation. It's more a prestige ranking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Rankings are BS. No doubt about that. But why do DCUM people say UVA is weak in STEM? I’m not saying it is strong, I just don’t know. The same way I dint know about 99% of colleges.
Because they are ignorant. Or their kid didn't get in and it's sour grapes. Or they are old and haven't kept up. Or they are UVA's rivals, Virginia Tech students and love posting stuff like this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
Rankings are BS. No doubt about that. But why do DCUM people say UVA is weak in STEM? I’m not saying it is strong, I just don’t know. The same way I dint know about 99% of colleges.
Anonymous wrote:
The academic ratings are composed of ten factors: SAT /ACT of incoming students (a weakness at Berkeley), percentage of incoming students in top 10% of their high school class, student-to-faculty ratio (another weak area for Berkeley), class size (another weak area for Berkeley), full time faculty %, Faculty with terminal degrees, mean faculty salary, freshman retention rate, six year graduation rate, and "graduation performance"--includes several factors including Pell Grant recipient graduation rates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
And, out comes the UVA troll…
Uva is really good at the easy subjects. Sucks at the rigorous stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UC Berkeley
Is that a basketball stadium? Who are playing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA is weak in STEM. So much for academic ratings. Another BS ranking.
And, out comes the UVA troll…