Anonymous wrote:There is just something about the GSUSA business model that makes its program more impacted by these factors. Other programs are challenged by similar things, but I don’t see the same level of operating difficulty and volunteer membership churn. I know we are especially busy people in the DMV, but we are probably not as unique as we think we are. Organization program and business approaches need to adapt in order to thrive, and with the exception of the cookie finance strategy, GSUSA volunteers just appear to be trudging an uphill path — and being told everything is okay. Well, enough from me, as I am not informed enough to say much more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has been an interesting read. What I come away with is that there is something fundamental about the membership and program business model that does not work quire right. I am not informed enough to venture a guess, but I suspect it has something to do with not recognizing or enforcing the need for adult involvement. Or, maybe there is something off-putting about the adult volunteer experience that discourages participation or retention. Is this a rational observation?
It works fine as a model, but people are so overworked at their office jobs now that many don't want their kids to participate in things that require additional effort from them as parents. Which is a perfectly reasonable way to organize your kids' schedule - throw some money at it and get them off your hands for a few hours a week - but it gets ridiculous when those parents start demanding that GSUSA cease to exist so their kid won't know there's an extracurricular they're not signed up for.
I'm a PP and see this happening more broadly, not just in Girl Scouts. See many of the summer swim threads with parents complaining about volunteering and asking why the team can't just pay for people to run concessions or serve as timers. Our neighborhood for years has had events that were organized by parents, and they aren't happening as much because newer families with young kids want to attend but not plan them. Our church has tons of families sign their kids up for Sunday school but it's already September and they still can't find enough parent volunteers to teach all the grade levels.
It's a model that has worked and does work for many families. However, it culturally appears that at least in this area of the country families have the resources that they'd rather give of their money than their time for children's extracurriculars. This becomes a personal decision for each family whether they prioritize a particular activity enough to make it happen.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, there are exceptions and men are “allowed”. But GSUSA is openly unwelcoming to men.
Anonymous wrote:This is how I became a leader. Our school had a big troop for all levels but expected someone to lead each grade separately. My older daughter was already in a troop and I was asked to lead when my younger daughter came of age.
I did insist on having our own troop number, which was a life saver because the book keeping was a nightmare for what were essentially independent troops sharing one number/account. During COVID most of the other grades stopped meeting . . . I think we might be the only troop that didn't fold.
I knew I could handle being a leader; I'm a former teacher and SAHM. I recruited a co-leader whom I'd met a couple of times; it was important to me that the troop not be filled with all my friends' kids like my older daughter's troop was. The next year we wanted to open our troop to all the girls in the grade, so I asked all my parents and two more moms signed on. So now we have four leaders. In some ways it's maybe too many cooks in the kitchen, but I still do most of the planning and only one mom is consistently helpful. It's still nice to have the others because they'll step up from time to time.
Our Council seems to be struggling (I think they barely avoided bankruptcy during the pandemic) and oversight and support is minimal. You have to be pretty self-sufficient to run a troop, and as a result you'll get a wide variety of interpretations of what Girl Scouts means to the leader(s). I'm not really gung ho about the philosophy or anything; I just want to provide a fun and safe environment for the girls.
In our council we do not have to list our troop on the online search function (when we were listed on there they kept adding girls who lived far away, when we're a school-specific troop, so I made them remove us). It may be that there are troops nearby that you can't see; you'll have to ask your council.
Leading a troop is a big ask and I try to make it as stress free as possible. Like I said, my council has basically stopped organizing events and offering programming. So for example I'm taking my troop to Colonial Williamsburg. We're staying at a rustic Air BNB nearby. I wanted to do this because our schools have stopped doing field trips thanks to the pandemic, and because I'm not really a camping person. Planning a camping weekend would nearly do me in. This is something I can handle. Likewise, we only meet once a month after school (and then plan about one weekend event per month). I don't have the bandwidth for more. If you do end up leading, you can make it what you want it to be.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, there are exceptions and men are “allowed”. But GSUSA is openly unwelcoming to men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is just something about the GSUSA business model that makes its program more impacted by these factors. Other programs are challenged by similar things, but I don’t see the same level of operating difficulty and volunteer membership churn. I know we are especially busy people in the DMV, but we are probably not as unique as we think we are. Organization program and business approaches need to adapt in order to thrive, and with the exception of the cookie finance strategy, GSUSA volunteers just appear to be trudging an uphill path — and being told everything is okay. Well, enough from me, as I am not informed enough to say much more.
Girl Scouts only allows female adult leaders, right? All other programs/activities that I can think of (including boy scouts) allows for both male and female adult leaders. By limiting themselves to female only, it cuts the number of potential volunteers in half.
I don't think that's the case. Our assistant troop leader is the father of one of the girls in the troop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is just something about the GSUSA business model that makes its program more impacted by these factors. Other programs are challenged by similar things, but I don’t see the same level of operating difficulty and volunteer membership churn. I know we are especially busy people in the DMV, but we are probably not as unique as we think we are. Organization program and business approaches need to adapt in order to thrive, and with the exception of the cookie finance strategy, GSUSA volunteers just appear to be trudging an uphill path — and being told everything is okay. Well, enough from me, as I am not informed enough to say much more.
Girl Scouts only allows female adult leaders, right? All other programs/activities that I can think of (including boy scouts) allows for both male and female adult leaders. By limiting themselves to female only, it cuts the number of potential volunteers in half.
Anonymous wrote:There is just something about the GSUSA business model that makes its program more impacted by these factors. Other programs are challenged by similar things, but I don’t see the same level of operating difficulty and volunteer membership churn. I know we are especially busy people in the DMV, but we are probably not as unique as we think we are. Organization program and business approaches need to adapt in order to thrive, and with the exception of the cookie finance strategy, GSUSA volunteers just appear to be trudging an uphill path — and being told everything is okay. Well, enough from me, as I am not informed enough to say much more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has been an interesting read. What I come away with is that there is something fundamental about the membership and program business model that does not work quire right. I am not informed enough to venture a guess, but I suspect it has something to do with not recognizing or enforcing the need for adult involvement. Or, maybe there is something off-putting about the adult volunteer experience that discourages participation or retention. Is this a rational observation?
It works fine as a model, but people are so overworked at their office jobs now that many don't want their kids to participate in things that require additional effort from them as parents. Which is a perfectly reasonable way to organize your kids' schedule - throw some money at it and get them off your hands for a few hours a week - but it gets ridiculous when those parents start demanding that GSUSA cease to exist so their kid won't know there's an extracurricular they're not signed up for.
I'm a PP and see this happening more broadly, not just in Girl Scouts. See many of the summer swim threads with parents complaining about volunteering and asking why the team can't just pay for people to run concessions or serve as timers. Our neighborhood for years has had events that were organized by parents, and they aren't happening as much because newer families with young kids want to attend but not plan them. Our church has tons of families sign their kids up for Sunday school but it's already September and they still can't find enough parent volunteers to teach all the grade levels.
It's a model that has worked and does work for many families. However, it culturally appears that at least in this area of the country families have the resources that they'd rather give of their money than their time for children's extracurriculars. This becomes a personal decision for each family whether they prioritize a particular activity enough to make it happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has been an interesting read. What I come away with is that there is something fundamental about the membership and program business model that does not work quire right. I am not informed enough to venture a guess, but I suspect it has something to do with not recognizing or enforcing the need for adult involvement. Or, maybe there is something off-putting about the adult volunteer experience that discourages participation or retention. Is this a rational observation?
It works fine as a model, but people are so overworked at their office jobs now that many don't want their kids to participate in things that require additional effort from them as parents. Which is a perfectly reasonable way to organize your kids' schedule - throw some money at it and get them off your hands for a few hours a week - but it gets ridiculous when those parents start demanding that GSUSA cease to exist so their kid won't know there's an extracurricular they're not signed up for.