Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP we present like a cis hetero couple but we're not so I'm queer
What does that mean?
DP. A bi person (or two) in an opposite sex marriage will present that way. I know at least one family with a trans man married to a cis woman, where if you don't know he's trans (and I didn't the first time I met him), they look like a cis hetero couple but aren't.
I guess I’m struggling to understand how bisexuals in a hetero marriage means anything. I mean, if you’re in a monogamous marriage, who cares that you were bisexual before. Now you are in a hetero marriage.
The people I know who identify as queer never refer to themselves as gay or lesbian, but they have same-sex partners. They also tend to present themselves in terms of hair/fashion, etc. in a way that doesn’t align with stereotypes related to their gender. More directly: they proudly put forth their queer identity in various ways.
Wow; thank you.
NP here. I've been hetero married for 20 years but I'm bi, just don't act on it. I don't define as queer though b/c I'm all good girl monogamous ect. When I look, fantasize and have crushes, I have two types. one is female and the other is male. Those two types are completely unrelated. And my HD is the 3rd type. Yet
A person didn't cease to be bisexual because they're monogamous and in a relationship with a person of the opposite gender. That's not what the identity is about, it's about who you're attracted to, sexually/romantically. That doesn't change because you're married.
But it doesn’t matter once you’re married. So why would you need to broadcast it to anyone once you are married?
Why doesn’t it matter? It’s still who they are.
It’s who they are attracted to, not who they are…particularly if married/hetero.
Why would anyone else need to know that?
That’s the point of the thread, right? Pondering why anyone feels compelled to put that info out there when married. And why on earth anyone would include it on their resume/cover letter unless they think it gives them an advantage. It seems like unnecessary, intimate info.
Not the pp you replied to. I'm a queer person. I absolutely consider bisexuals in a heterosexual marriage as valid queer people. Just because they get heterosexual privilege doesn't mean they're not still queer. It also doesn't mean that they don't suffer when people discriminate against queer people. They either have to stand up with the rest of us or sit in silence in the closet. Being in the closet is being ashamed of your identity.
Wow; thank you.
NP here. I've been hetero married for 20 years but I'm bi, just don't act on it and was in a monogamous gay relationship for a long time. I don't define as queer though b/c I'm all good girl monogamous ect. When I look, fantasize and have crushes, I have two types. one is female and the other is male. Those two types are completely unrelated. And my HD is the 3rd type. Yet when I think about how I think, I never think I'm straight. It goes so much beyond my crushes too. All that said, I always check the straight box when they are offered.
Same. If I got harassed in high school for having a girlfriend, the fact that I married a man doesn't change that lived experience of being bi. Bi erasure is super common.
Anonymous wrote:S|O: I’ve noticed a few resumes/cover letters highlighting a person identifies as queer or bisexual. One person I know well enough to know they are in a hetero marriage and they come across as very traditional insofar as their appearance, clothing, etc. Another colleague noticed it as well, and we are wondering if this is a new way to promote yourself as diverse when you really aren’t.
Re: including bisexuality on your resume/cover letter: I just don’t understand this at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP we present like a cis hetero couple but we're not so I'm queer
What does that mean?
DP. A bi person (or two) in an opposite sex marriage will present that way. I know at least one family with a trans man married to a cis woman, where if you don't know he's trans (and I didn't the first time I met him), they look like a cis hetero couple but aren't.
I guess I’m struggling to understand how bisexuals in a hetero marriage means anything. I mean, if you’re in a monogamous marriage, who cares that you were bisexual before. Now you are in a hetero marriage.
The people I know who identify as queer never refer to themselves as gay or lesbian, but they have same-sex partners. They also tend to present themselves in terms of hair/fashion, etc. in a way that doesn’t align with stereotypes related to their gender. More directly: they proudly put forth their queer identity in various ways.
Wow; thank you.
NP here. I've been hetero married for 20 years but I'm bi, just don't act on it. I don't define as queer though b/c I'm all good girl monogamous ect. When I look, fantasize and have crushes, I have two types. one is female and the other is male. Those two types are completely unrelated. And my HD is the 3rd type. Yet
A person didn't cease to be bisexual because they're monogamous and in a relationship with a person of the opposite gender. That's not what the identity is about, it's about who you're attracted to, sexually/romantically. That doesn't change because you're married.
But it doesn’t matter once you’re married. So why would you need to broadcast it to anyone once you are married?
Why doesn’t it matter? It’s still who they are.
It’s who they are attracted to, not who they are…particularly if married/hetero.
Why would anyone else need to know that?
That’s the point of the thread, right? Pondering why anyone feels compelled to put that info out there when married. And why on earth anyone would include it on their resume/cover letter unless they think it gives them an advantage. It seems like unnecessary, intimate info.
Not the pp you replied to. I'm a queer person. I absolutely consider bisexuals in a heterosexual marriage as valid queer people. Just because they get heterosexual privilege doesn't mean they're not still queer. It also doesn't mean that they don't suffer when people discriminate against queer people. They either have to stand up with the rest of us or sit in silence in the closet. Being in the closet is being ashamed of your identity.
Wow; thank you.
NP here. I've been hetero married for 20 years but I'm bi, just don't act on it and was in a monogamous gay relationship for a long time. I don't define as queer though b/c I'm all good girl monogamous ect. When I look, fantasize and have crushes, I have two types. one is female and the other is male. Those two types are completely unrelated. And my HD is the 3rd type. Yet when I think about how I think, I never think I'm straight. It goes so much beyond my crushes too. All that said, I always check the straight box when they are offered.
Anonymous wrote:My friend and her husband both identify as queer. I still don’t totally understand what they mean by that but I accept and love them. They are poly and very into kink so my assumption is those elements are what they identify with as queer but they have never actually said that to me.
My sister identifies as queer also- and she sleeps exclusively with women. She doesn’t like the word “lesbian” and has never explained her reasoning on that. She has really strong feelings about heterosexual couples identifying as queer based on the fact that they are into kink.
Personally, I am going to accept any label you give yourself. Truly takes no effort on my part and doesn’t impact my life in anyway.
Anonymous wrote:My friend and her husband both identify as queer. I still don’t totally understand what they mean by that but I accept and love them. They are poly and very into kink so my assumption is those elements are what they identify with as queer but they have never actually said that to me.
My sister identifies as queer also- and she sleeps exclusively with women. She doesn’t like the word “lesbian” and has never explained her reasoning on that. She has really strong feelings about heterosexual couples identifying as queer based on the fact that they are into kink.
Personally, I am going to accept any label you give yourself. Truly takes no effort on my part and doesn’t impact my life in anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP we present like a cis hetero couple but we're not so I'm queer
What does that mean?
DP. A bi person (or two) in an opposite sex marriage will present that way. I know at least one family with a trans man married to a cis woman, where if you don't know he's trans (and I didn't the first time I met him), they look like a cis hetero couple but aren't.
I guess I’m struggling to understand how bisexuals in a hetero marriage means anything. I mean, if you’re in a monogamous marriage, who cares that you were bisexual before. Now you are in a hetero marriage.
The people I know who identify as queer never refer to themselves as gay or lesbian, but they have same-sex partners. They also tend to present themselves in terms of hair/fashion, etc. in a way that doesn’t align with stereotypes related to their gender. More directly: they proudly put forth their queer identity in various ways.
Wow; thank you.
NP here. I've been hetero married for 20 years but I'm bi, just don't act on it. I don't define as queer though b/c I'm all good girl monogamous ect. When I look, fantasize and have crushes, I have two types. one is female and the other is male. Those two types are completely unrelated. And my HD is the 3rd type. Yet
A person didn't cease to be bisexual because they're monogamous and in a relationship with a person of the opposite gender. That's not what the identity is about, it's about who you're attracted to, sexually/romantically. That doesn't change because you're married.
But it doesn’t matter once you’re married. So why would you need to broadcast it to anyone once you are married?
Why doesn’t it matter? It’s still who they are.
It’s who they are attracted to, not who they are…particularly if married/hetero.
Why would anyone else need to know that?
That’s the point of the thread, right? Pondering why anyone feels compelled to put that info out there when married. And why on earth anyone would include it on their resume/cover letter unless they think it gives them an advantage. It seems like unnecessary, intimate info.
Not the pp you replied to. I'm a queer person. I absolutely consider bisexuals in a heterosexual marriage as valid queer people. Just because they get heterosexual privilege doesn't mean they're not still queer. It also doesn't mean that they don't suffer when people discriminate against queer people. They either have to stand up with the rest of us or sit in silence in the closet. Being in the closet is being ashamed of your identity.

Anonymous wrote:I hope this is not offensive. Is this a thing? An acquaintance and her boyfriend, both of whom are cisgender, are telling people that they are queer. What does this mean? It feels like weird appropriation but maybe I’m missing something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You sometimes get straight cis people calling themselves queer because they're poly or into kink, which makes me roll my eyes but does happen. They also might be one or both bisexual. Some people like that might call themselves queer.
Personally, I'm cis and straight but I'm married to a trans man (I'm also a man, we don't have sex anymore). I'd never call myself queer, but my family is (even when he passes we look like two guys), so my language there shifts depending on context. Obviously that doesn't sound like what's happening here, but a reminder that things can be complicated.
Honest question - You're a man, and your spouse is a trans man. Trans men are men, so doesn't that make you homosexual?
He’s straight. He’s not attracted to his spouse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You sometimes get straight cis people calling themselves queer because they're poly or into kink, which makes me roll my eyes but does happen. They also might be one or both bisexual. Some people like that might call themselves queer.
Personally, I'm cis and straight but I'm married to a trans man (I'm also a man, we don't have sex anymore). I'd never call myself queer, but my family is (even when he passes we look like two guys), so my language there shifts depending on context. Obviously that doesn't sound like what's happening here, but a reminder that things can be complicated.
Honest question - You're a man, and your spouse is a trans man. Trans men are men, so doesn't that make you homosexual?
Anonymous wrote:You sometimes get straight cis people calling themselves queer because they're poly or into kink, which makes me roll my eyes but does happen. They also might be one or both bisexual. Some people like that might call themselves queer.
Personally, I'm cis and straight but I'm married to a trans man (I'm also a man, we don't have sex anymore). I'd never call myself queer, but my family is (even when he passes we look like two guys), so my language there shifts depending on context. Obviously that doesn't sound like what's happening here, but a reminder that things can be complicated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP we present like a cis hetero couple but we're not so I'm queer
What does that mean?
DP. A bi person (or two) in an opposite sex marriage will present that way. I know at least one family with a trans man married to a cis woman, where if you don't know he's trans (and I didn't the first time I met him), they look like a cis hetero couple but aren't.
I guess I’m struggling to understand how bisexuals in a hetero marriage means anything. I mean, if you’re in a monogamous marriage, who cares that you were bisexual before. Now you are in a hetero marriage.
The people I know who identify as queer never refer to themselves as gay or lesbian, but they have same-sex partners. They also tend to present themselves in terms of hair/fashion, etc. in a way that doesn’t align with stereotypes related to their gender. More directly: they proudly put forth their queer identity in various ways.
A person didn't cease to be bisexual because they're monogamous and in a relationship with a person of the opposite gender. That's not what the identity is about, it's about who you're attracted to, sexually/romantically. That doesn't change because you're married.
But it doesn’t matter once you’re married. So why would you need to broadcast it to anyone once you are married?
Why doesn’t it matter? It’s still who they are.
It’s who they are attracted to, not who they are…particularly if married/hetero.
Why would anyone else need to know that?
That’s the point of the thread, right? Pondering why anyone feels compelled to put that info out there when married. And why on earth anyone would include it on their resume/cover letter unless they think it gives them an advantage. It seems like unnecessary, intimate info.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP we present like a cis hetero couple but we're not so I'm queer
What does that mean?
DP. A bi person (or two) in an opposite sex marriage will present that way. I know at least one family with a trans man married to a cis woman, where if you don't know he's trans (and I didn't the first time I met him), they look like a cis hetero couple but aren't.
I guess I’m struggling to understand how bisexuals in a hetero marriage means anything. I mean, if you’re in a monogamous marriage, who cares that you were bisexual before. Now you are in a hetero marriage.
The people I know who identify as queer never refer to themselves as gay or lesbian, but they have same-sex partners. They also tend to present themselves in terms of hair/fashion, etc. in a way that doesn’t align with stereotypes related to their gender. More directly: they proudly put forth their queer identity in various ways.
A person didn't cease to be bisexual because they're monogamous and in a relationship with a person of the opposite gender. That's not what the identity is about, it's about who you're attracted to, sexually/romantically. That doesn't change because you're married.
But it doesn’t matter once you’re married. So why would you need to broadcast it to anyone once you are married?
Why doesn’t it matter? It’s still who they are.