Anonymous wrote:There's no way she's 47, not because of how she looks, because I'm 45 and in the early 2000's she was five to eight years my elder.

I seriously think that celebrities pay people to silently edit their ages across media platforms in a very slow and strategic way. It's not all at once, but she was definitely more than two years older than me twelve years ago.

Anonymous wrote:My point is that the other women actresses received far more attention for their looks in their heyday than Eva. That’s a fact.

Anonymous wrote:Yes, those stars were likely very beautiful…but look at them now.

Eva was never considered in their league but now she looks better than all of them and she’s their age or older. Kate Beckinsale in particular, what on earth? Eva is playing the long game. Love that for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

And genetics

Yes, one thing that becomes very clear if you ever spend any time dealing with celebrities like this up close is that many of them were simply born MUCH better looking than the rest of us. This is hard to understand if you only see them in photos or on screens, where they are generally surrounded by people who are either also genetically blessed or who have spent a lot to look genetically blessed. But if you interact with the beautiful people up close you realize that even without the plastic surgery and other enhancements (which they all 100% get, especially after 35, but often even before that), these are beautiful people. Most of them got their "big break" before the age of 25, usually before they've had a chance to do a lot of work. They are better looking than 99% of people.

A good example is Jennifer Garner. She got her first real roles in her late 20s and if you look at photos from then, it's clear she had work done once she hit stardom with Alias (the biggest tell is her mouth -- she had a gummy smile in her 20s and had it fixed). But I met her at auditions back then and she was absolutely gorgeous and definitely had "it" factor even though she'd never done anything. Some people really are kind of born to be stars. They cannot pass as normal people. Never met Longoria but my guess is that she falls in this camp.

+1. I met Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel, Giselle and Ben Affleck back in the day, and they all stood out in a crowd of some very beautiful and successful but regular (non star) people. Just drop dead gorgeous in person at their peak.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

And genetics

Yes, one thing that becomes very clear if you ever spend any time dealing with celebrities like this up close is that many of them were simply born MUCH better looking than the rest of us. This is hard to understand if you only see them in photos or on screens, where they are generally surrounded by people who are either also genetically blessed or who have spent a lot to look genetically blessed. But if you interact with the beautiful people up close you realize that even without the plastic surgery and other enhancements (which they all 100% get, especially after 35, but often even before that), these are beautiful people. Most of them got their "big break" before the age of 25, usually before they've had a chance to do a lot of work. They are better looking than 99% of people.

A good example is Jennifer Garner. She got her first real roles in her late 20s and if you look at photos from then, it's clear she had work done once she hit stardom with Alias (the biggest tell is her mouth -- she had a gummy smile in her 20s and had it fixed). But I met her at auditions back then and she was absolutely gorgeous and definitely had "it" factor even though she'd never done anything. Some people really are kind of born to be stars. They cannot pass as normal people. Never met Longoria but my guess is that she falls in this camp.

+1. I met Kate Beckinsale, Jessica Biel, Giselle and Ben Affleck back in the day, and they all stood out in a crowd of some very beautiful and successful but regular (non star) people. Just drop dead gorgeous in person at their peak.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree she looks good.

But please be aware that all celebs have plastic surgery in addition to $ for help with diet, exercise, and kids. Don’t compare yourself to surgically enhanced celebrities.

And genetics

Yes, one thing that becomes very clear if you ever spend any time dealing with celebrities like this up close is that many of them were simply born MUCH better looking than the rest of us. This is hard to understand if you only see them in photos or on screens, where they are generally surrounded by people who are either also genetically blessed or who have spent a lot to look genetically blessed. But if you interact with the beautiful people up close you realize that even without the plastic surgery and other enhancements (which they all 100% get, especially after 35, but often even before that), these are beautiful people. Most of them got their "big break" before the age of 25, usually before they've had a chance to do a lot of work. They are better looking than 99% of people.

A good example is Jennifer Garner. She got her first real roles in her late 20s and if you look at photos from then, it's clear she had work done once she hit stardom with Alias (the biggest tell is her mouth -- she had a gummy smile in her 20s and had it fixed). But I met her at auditions back then and she was absolutely gorgeous and definitely had "it" factor even though she'd never done anything. Some people really are kind of born to be stars. They cannot pass as normal people. Never met Longoria but my guess is that she falls in this camp.